Mr Skeptic Posted June 29, 2008 Posted June 29, 2008 There is a large number of animals that sing: crickets, birds, whales. You might consider visual rhythms to be related as well (luminescence, dance, etc) to be related as well. I was wondering, which branches of the animal kingdom do this, especially those in our line? And how does it relate to our communication? We can communicate in song as well as in speech, and singing and speaking use different parts of the brain. Since most song is related to communication (or mating), I was wondering if song could have been what we built our language from.
iNow Posted June 29, 2008 Posted June 29, 2008 I often wonder if all of the vibrations at the atomic level could be interepreted by microscopic organisms as "song," but I'm not sure if that relates to discussion you are attempting to have.
Psycho Posted June 29, 2008 Posted June 29, 2008 What you class as birds singing would be the equivalent of our talking, they are one and the same thing, they have just been classified differently by humans.
CDarwin Posted June 30, 2008 Posted June 30, 2008 There was a good article in the New Scientist about this. I'd have to find it. Unfortunately I don't remember enough to really communicate anything I 'learned' from it. I do remember that dolphins and whales actually have 'signature' songs that they use to identify themselves. I found that interesting. Oh, and generally primates don't like music, and the quieter and slower the better. Primates make very few noises that don't encode something specifically in their social setting. They are warnings or designed to elicit comfort, play, some other specific idea. That might be an important context to understand human singing. Where birds may sing simply to impress a mate or rival, primate sounds seem much more geared toward illiciting emotion in conspecifics, and that would seem to apply our songs as well.
Mr Skeptic Posted June 30, 2008 Author Posted June 30, 2008 I often wonder if all of the vibrations at the atomic level could be interepreted by microscopic organisms as "song," but I'm not sure if that relates to discussion you are attempting to have. I'm aiming wide, but I think the signal would have to originate from a living thing to count as song, and having neurons might also be a prerequisite. Rhythmic chemical secretions might count and are probably the only way microbes could be involved. (This seems very unlikely.)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now