Chandrakanth Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 Today, everybody knows that natural satellites, planets, stars etc. are moving elliptically in space. But even in the 21st century science has failed to answer “Why it is moving elliptically?” Why? Science knows very well that the movements of the air pressure in the atmosphere are connected with the energy movements of the Polar Regions. But why it is connected with the Polar Regions? Which energetic force from the Polar Region is controlling the movements of the air pressure in the atmosphere? Why the science cannot answer all these questions even in the 21st century? The question is: if gravity pulls the atmosphere towards the earth's surface then how do the movements of the air molecules are connected with the energy movements of the Polar Regions? Science must answer these fundamental questions. It is the duty of the scientists to answer without resorting to assumptions. Science knows that during winter there will be vortex in the northern and southern hemispheres. They witnessed it and named it as the “Polar Vortex”, but why the vortex emerges during winter? What is the energy secret connected with these two vortexes? If there is no permanent vortex in the northern and southern hemispheres; how it can emerge and disappear only in winter? Present science does not have answer! Why? What is the true secret connected with the high and low tides of the ocean? Is it not connected with the energy movements of the Polar Vortexes? Why we are using ‘moon’s gravity’ to shield our inability to answer the energy secret connected with the high and low tides of the ocean? Science knows about the ‘Aurora’ occurrence in the Polar Region, but what is the root cause of the Aurora? Why it occurs? Which energy gives birth to Aurora? Why can’t we answer all these simple questions of nature? Present science knows that every planet has magnetosphere, but why the science does not have answer about the energy secret connected with the very birth of the magnetosphere even after several so called deep scientific observations? How many of us know that gravity, big-bang and black-holes are not proven theory? Why the science is not mentioning it in the school books and providing scientific foundation for children to invent the answer? The text book of Physics, page 338-339, The National Science Foundation of America says, “Centrifugal force was imagined by Newton to adjust planetary dynamics within gravitational law. There is no existence of any such real force in Astrodynamics.” and The Scientific American, monthly Science Magazine (March 1981), says, in page 127, "Centrifugal force is fictitious force having no real existence. Newton compelled to create this force to frame planetary dynamic within his law of universal gravitation." But how many of us know it? Astronomers have discovered that all galaxies are rushing away from one another, but cannot explain why galaxies are rushing away from one another without any force attached to it. Present science knows that the Sun’s outer atmosphere (the corona) is hotter than 10,00,000° C while the visible surface of the sun has a temperature of only 6,000° C, but why all the existing cosmological equations are not capable to answer these questions? It is evident that the temperature of the ‘Corona’ is connected with some other energy source, not with the temperature of the sun. But why the science has failed to identify that energy source? Science must do a soul searching! It should answer the fundamentals. It is the duty of the science to answer ‘Whys’ first! Otherwise, we are giving birth to another dogmatic philosophy, not to science. According to the declaration of NASA, after 26 years of its launch, 'Voyager -1' spacecraft is very near the outer limit of the solar system. When it was launched in 1977, NASA had declared that 'Voyager -1' was only meant to survive five years in space. But what is the energy secret of the immensely extended life span of the spacecraft 'Voyager -1'? NASA does not have a scientific explanation. Why? Science knows that everything in this universe is made up of sub-atomic particles, so there must be one simple underlying principle that governs everything from the minute sub-atomic particle to vast cosmos. We are happy to forward that scientific secret in our forthcoming book, NUCLEUS OF THE ABSOLUTE. It introduces the reader deep into the unknown depths of the nucleus and explore the inner root of the underlying energy source that governs the universe. Soon, we intend to make a multimedia presentation with the 3D graphics to the international media about this fascinating Truth. We will give a preview presentation that explores the scientific root of the ‘Grand Unified Forces of Nature’ and its eternal relativity with the ‘Super Spinning Motion of the Universe’. This multimedia presentation will come in the form of DVD with the 3D graphics as a soul searching lamp for the further scientific inventions and discoveries. After the presentation, we will officially forward a new hypothesis to the scientific centres across the world. As we know, the science has proved several equations related with the terrestrial and celestial dynamics, and Quantum Mechanics, but there is no single proven equation related to Newton's law of gravity. NASA and European Space Agency have spent trillions of dollars to search for the gravitational waves. Nineteenth century science says that if there is a force, waves must exist. Scientists have theorized about graviton, the gravitational particle, for years, but have been frustrated in their attempts to find a consistent quantum theory for it. Ironically, the geo-centric paradigm of Ptolemy itself is the invisible philosophical root for the gravity-centric paradigm. The former seems to have taken shelter in the unconscious mind of Newton and continued its journey. Gravity-centric theory is just an advanced form of geo-centric theory where we have not considered the thermonuclear wonders of the universal repulsive force and its relativity with the super spinning motion of the cosmos as the fundamental. Frederic Engels says, "The whole theory of gravitation rests on the saying that attraction is the essence of matter. This is necessarily false. Where there is attraction, it must be compensated by repulsion. A theory of gravity based on mere attraction is not only inadequate, but also one sided. In fact, sufficient phenomenon occurs that demonstrate this in advance”. Long ago, Aristotle had rejected the definition of space as void. He said that empty space is impossibility. After manifold observations and experiments, the space science has also reached the same conclusion. The omnipresent character of electricity and magnetism in the infinite space has stunned the modern scientific world. In the infinite space, when the repulsive forces of two spinning objects collide, it works like an electric generator with a powerful electromagnetic circuit system. Modern science, however, has thoroughly misunderstood the electromagnetic behaviour pattern resulting from the interface of the repulsive forces. It has erroneously attributed electromagnetism as the outcome of a magnetic field of particular planet or star. At the present juncture, it is impossible to continue any decisive scientific journey without understanding the inner most character of universal repulsive force and its law of equilibrium. From the inner core of human mind, atomic nuclei, matter, earth, stellar family, galaxy, cluster of galaxies to super clusters, everywhere, the force of repulsion is the driving power. But the modern science has not identified the thermo-nuclear wonders of repulsion and its association with human intelligence, nature and the entire universe. It has failed to discover the immense power of universal repulsive force and its strength related to every mechanical, physical and chemical motion, expansion and transformation in the infinite space. In the last century, numerous scientists have spent their energy to define the falsification of orthodox science in their quest to prove the erroneous concept of gravitational attraction. Now there is a need to free the human mind from this falsification and its dogmatic yoke. It is very easy to simplify the scientific understanding of the human mind, nature and the entire universe with the commanding truth of universal repulsive force and its law of equilibrium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 I didn't read it all... two points though. Tides: Sun and moon gravity. Aurora borealis: is an EM effect due to the magnetic field of the earth acting as a trap for charged particles. It's well known and well studied Based on these two observations I'm guessing that most of your other statements are probably false. When I feel a bit less BLEH I might go through your whole post pointing out the bits that are wrong... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphus Posted July 3, 2008 Share Posted July 3, 2008 Today, everybody knows that natural satellites, planets, stars etc. are moving elliptically in space. But even in the 21st century science has failed to answer “Why it is moving elliptically?” Why? Because the force of gravity varies inversely with the square of the distance between the attracted bodies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 We are happy to forward that scientific secret in our forthcoming book, NUCLEUS OF THE ABSOLUTE. Is it going to be as bad as the rest of this stuff? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 Because the force of gravity varies inversely with the square of the distance between the attracted bodies. This is exactly why. If you solve the equations of motion for such a system you get three kinds of solutions, ellipses, hyperboloids and parabolic. The first is a closed orbit, while the other two are open. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D H Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 Chandrakanth, Every single one of your questions is answerable via a few handy research tools. Some are quite new, such as this one and this one. Others, such as this one and this one, have been around for some time. Since you have ignore all of these resources, what makes us think you will pay any attention to us? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandrakanth Posted July 5, 2008 Author Share Posted July 5, 2008 Dear DH, Please answer. Some of the question even NASA does not have answer. If you have answer please let me know. I know that we are living in the world where Vatican has treated Galileo as prisoner. I strongly feel that we, human beings are the slaves of the known and it is the known that is preventing us from mastering the unknown. Note: If you are interested to attend the international media conference with your all critiques; you are most welcome. Every question will be given answer on the spot itself in front of the media. i will address through video conference. If i cannot answer any question connected with the science of the cosmos and 'Theory of Everything’ then i will consider myself as useless for nothing. I am getting ready to give justice to the scientists like Galileo and Copernicus. Chandra with spiritual compassion of Truth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 It is never very wise to try to compare your self to Galileo or any other well-known scientist unless you really do have something in common, i.e. shared the same position, come from the same town, went to the same university, was your supervisor, had the same supervisor etc... Otherwise, you simply come across as a quack and a charlatan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 Alacazam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 As Chandrakanth has admitted to just shilling for the book, there is no point in continuing this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 I did actually lock it with the "Alacazam" post; I was not just posting that word for fun. Thread re-locked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts