Xain Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 im not sure on where to put this but i was thinking of a way to make it or something halfway decent with magnets and whatnot bt i was curious can you have just a south pole on a magnet? and just a north? and how would i go about storing energy in a bettery from a revolving wheel with a copper coil?
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 As far as we know, there's no way to make a magnet with only one pole (a "monopole"). Nobody's ever seen one.
Xain Posted July 5, 2008 Author Posted July 5, 2008 i was thinking about a bikewheel shape, with 7-8 spokes(im not sure if numbers matter) adn a large elecrtomagnet on the bottom so it doesnt wear out as fast as the others, then a copper ciol around the magnet in the middle of the spoke
Klaynos Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 And how do you power the electromagnet? And no, magnetic monopoles don't exist.
Xain Posted July 5, 2008 Author Posted July 5, 2008 i would power it with the energy from the rotating magnets on the copper coils
Klaynos Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 It'd quite quickly stop rotating then. And it wouldn't be an electromagnet then just a coil.
Xain Posted July 5, 2008 Author Posted July 5, 2008 give it a push one pole pulls magnet #1 the other pole pushes magnet#2 they rotate, generate electricity and send the eletricity to the elecro magnet would this work? if not then why?
Klaynos Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 No, friction and losses in teh wire and electromagnet... There's probably other reasons too, but they in themselves are killers.
Xain Posted July 5, 2008 Author Posted July 5, 2008 if i put it in a very efficent vacuum? and what do you mean by losses?
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 Unless the electromagnet is superconductive (in which case you'd need a refrigeration plant to keep it running) it'll lose some energy to electrical resistance.
Klaynos Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 if i put it in a very efficent vacuum? and what do you mean by losses? losses as Cap'n Refsmmat explained. And you can't create a perfect vacuum. You'd also have to screen it from everything which would be pretty much impossible,
Xain Posted July 5, 2008 Author Posted July 5, 2008 i can run it through a circuit board to amplify the electricity and i was thinking about a vacuum thats better then just sitting in the open anything to help the machine note, this is my first project thats even close to this closes project would be a breadboard i did 5 years ago
Klaynos Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 You can't magically amplify the electricity, you'd need to have some input, and you'd still have losses the circuit board would heat up. A partial vacuum would reduce the friction, but there is still friction between all the moving parts. And pertetual motion requires it to run forever, and that's before you even start removing energy from the system to do work.
Xain Posted July 5, 2008 Author Posted July 5, 2008 you cant amplify it by running it though certain components? with the friction: have magnets spaced around a tube so that it floats around the rod
Klaynos Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 you cant amplify it by running it though certain components? with the friction: have magnets spaced around a tube so that it floats around the rod No you can't, you either have less energy, or some method of adding energy. That's why things like op-amps have power connectors. There'd still be friction, and how do you make teh magnets float?
Kyrisch Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 I used to have an idea for a perpetual motion machine because that was before I learned the concept of Conservation of Energy. The energy content of a system never changes. Therefore, since SOME energy will be lost to heat (due to friction, imperfect vacuum, etc.) it will EVENTUALLY stop, even if it runs for a while.
Xain Posted July 5, 2008 Author Posted July 5, 2008 have the magnets in a circle with one pole point towards the rod, they will all have even force and pull away from the rod in every direction ill make a diagram
Kyrisch Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 Earth magnets slowly become apolarised. Electromagnets are extremely energy inefficient.
Xain Posted July 5, 2008 Author Posted July 5, 2008 what do you mean apolarised? http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b246/ishvid/PM2copy.jpg thats looking from the bottom of the unit its very simple theres so much i cant put on there in ps i need some kind of 3d design thing to show you
John Cuthber Posted July 6, 2008 Posted July 6, 2008 Magnets don't stay magnets forever, they lose their power. Any moving conductive object in a magnetic field will have eddy currents induced in it. If the material isn't a superconductor then these will draw energy from the system. The system will end up stationary but slightly warmer than it was.
Xain Posted July 6, 2008 Author Posted July 6, 2008 well, i give into the idea of perpetual motion for now but soon it will be possible im sure
insane_alien Posted July 6, 2008 Posted July 6, 2008 not unless the 2nd law of thermodynamics can be broken which has never been observed anywhere. and if it can be it will involve some obscure quantum mechanical type thing and not a couple of magnets, bit of stickyback plastic and a yoghurt pot. (reference to blue peter, a kids tv show, for those not in the uk)
Xain Posted July 6, 2008 Author Posted July 6, 2008 ok, but in the future its not possible to to bend, or even break a law? i think it can be done, regardless of what the laws say, but as of this point in time after all that has been said, it seems almost impossible so with that, ill try and make something that at least lasts a long time
swansont Posted July 6, 2008 Posted July 6, 2008 ok, but in the future its not possible to to bend, or even break a law? i think it can be done, regardless of what the laws say, but as of this point in time after all that has been said, it seems almost impossible so with that, ill try and make something that at least lasts a long time Conservation of energy is equivalent to the laws of physics being invariant in time. So if you expect this to happen, physics has to change.
Xain Posted July 6, 2008 Author Posted July 6, 2008 shouldent physics be changing then they use the LHC assuming it doesnt kill us?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now