Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

How does the organic matter Rubidium tetrabromoaurate synthesize? Can any expert give some suggestion to me. Thank you in advance!

Edited by Dak
removed link
Posted

The simplest synthesis I can think of is mixing gold with a solution of nitric acid and hydrobromic acid to form auric acid which can then react with rubidium to form rubidium tetrabromoaurate. Rubidium tetrabromoaurate isn't organic btw.

Posted

Hmm actually the auric acid I mentioned isn't auric acid if it's made with HBr instead of HCl, as auric acid is HAuCl4. "Bromoauric acid" maybe? Perhaps one of the chemistry experts knows if the synthesis I mentioned will actually work.

Posted
Hmm actually the auric acid I mentioned isn't auric acid if it's made with HBr instead of HCl, as auric acid is HAuCl4. "Bromoauric acid" maybe? Perhaps one of the chemistry experts knows if the synthesis I mentioned will actually work.

 

i'm not sure if auric acid exists. [ce]HAuCl4[/ce] is hydrochloroauric acid, so i guess the bromo one is hydrobromoauric acid

Posted
i'm not sure if auric acid exists. [ce]HAuCl4[/ce] is hydrochloroauric acid, so i guess the bromo one is hydrobromoauric acid

 

Oh. I recall the product of the rather famous gold + aqua regia reaction ([ce]HAuCl4[/ce]) being called auric acid, but that's probably just a trivial name.

Posted

RbBr + AuBr3 = RbAuBr4

all as Aqueous.

 

 

HBr + AuBr3(aq) ---> H+[AuBr4]−

but other Halide sources can be used here also, RbBr for instance ;)

Posted

AuBr4- ought to be fairly easily synthesised either as YT2095 says from RbBr and AuBr3.

 

There may also be other ways. This is because AuX4- is d8 square planar and these compounds are extremely labile as regards substitution. Thus displacement of Cl- ligands from AuCl4- would probably work in the presence of excess RbBr. The trans directing nature of Cl- and Br- should be similar. Some of the original work on substitution of d8 square planar complexes was carried out on such gold complexes, (1940's and 1950's) which seems a little surprising to me as d8 square planar Pd(II), Pt(II) Rh(I) and Ir(I) have been more thoroughly studied

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.