Guest wallac Posted April 10, 2004 Posted April 10, 2004 A couple weeks ago Albanian extremists burned down 31 Serbian Ortodox churches and set on fire over 300 Serbian houses in Kosovo! No one is admiting etnic clansym after NAtO bombing in 1999. Well happy Estern everyone!!!
Dave Posted April 10, 2004 Posted April 10, 2004 Do you have some kind of a link to a news article or something similar?
Skye Posted April 10, 2004 Posted April 10, 2004 http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&storyID=478765§ion=news
Guest wallac Posted April 11, 2004 Posted April 11, 2004 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3525168.stm http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?click_id=24&art_id=qw1079582582224B261&set_id=1 Or just Google "Serb churches burn in Kosovo"
atinymonkey Posted April 11, 2004 Posted April 11, 2004 Funny place that, the only country to really have managed communism for a sustained period without upset. Then Tito dies, they go turn capitalist and kablooey. I really must put some effort into banning organised religion; by and large bloodthirsty bigots at heart (bless ‘em).
Misodoctakleidi Posted April 14, 2004 Posted April 14, 2004 managed communism for a sustained period without upset I would hardly describe it as communism, they were really lacking the two key ingredients; a classless society and a stateless society.
atinymonkey Posted April 26, 2004 Posted April 26, 2004 I think you have a differing concept of Communism to the mainstream. A stateless state is not possible to achieve unless the world were one system. However, classless society was there and functioning. It may have become dysfunctional in the later years when they succumbed to tourism. Besides, it's like classing America as Communist because an authoritarian party is in control.
Misodoctakleidi Posted April 26, 2004 Posted April 26, 2004 No, i think you have a different concept of commmunist to communists, communism is by defintion stateless, a classless state would be socialism. It's not possible to have a classless society as long as there is a state and Yugoslavia certainly didin't come close. Class is about relationship to the means of production, in Yugoslavia the means of production were centralised into the hands of the state therefore each level of the state hierachy had a different relationship to the means of production, hardly a classless society. A stateless state ...I...see...? Besides, it's like classing America as Communist because an authoritarian party is in control. Communism isn't authoritarian, you seem very confused.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now