Pradeepkumar Posted August 22, 2008 Share Posted August 22, 2008 (edited) Others stars contain sunspots,don't they?? Edited August 22, 2008 by Pradeepkumar Wrong question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insane_alien Posted August 22, 2008 Share Posted August 22, 2008 we are pretty sure they have sunspots but we do not have telescopes powerful enough for direct observation yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPanic Posted August 22, 2008 Share Posted August 22, 2008 (edited) Not even our nearest neighbors? Alpha Centauri is only about 287,000x as far as the sun... rather disappointing I must say. Sun = 8 light minutes Alpha Centauri = 4.37 light years = 4.37*365*24*60 / 8 = 287,000x distance earth - sun The sun is big enough to see sunspots with the naked eye (ok, with a filter, but no telescope needed) and we have equipment that can magnify things more than 287,000 times... At least, that's what I thought. Edited August 22, 2008 by CaptainPanic adding calculation for factor 287,000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted August 22, 2008 Share Posted August 22, 2008 It's the resolution which is the issue here not the magnification... We just can't resolve things that are that small with current telescopes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPanic Posted August 22, 2008 Share Posted August 22, 2008 In other words, we can make it as big as the sun (on a picture) but it'll be a bit of a blur? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D H Posted August 22, 2008 Share Posted August 22, 2008 A largish cluster of sunspots on the Sun is about 20 Earth diameters across. The angle a similar sized cluser would subtend on Proxima Centauri is [math]20\cdot2\cdot 6378\,\text{km} / 4.2\,\text{light years} = 3.2\cdot10^{-9} = 1.3\,\text{mas}[/math] Seeing such a cluster even on the closest star would require a telescope capable of twice that resolution to avoid aliasing problems, or less than a milliarcsecond. In comparison, the best telescopes do not yet have the resolution to see the objects the Apollo project left on the Moon, and doing that would require a telescope capable of seeing things at the 2.7 milliarcsecond level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arch2008 Posted August 22, 2008 Share Posted August 22, 2008 Scientists can detect magnetic disturbances on the surfaces of tiny red dwarf stars. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071205095342.htm A red dwarf is only a few percent of the size of our Sun, so it may be possible to detect the magnetic side effect of “solar spots” on larger stars. It’s just never been attempted. http://www.grantchronicles.com/astro25.htm As to the second question, I think that we know enough about stars to say that they have spots too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainPanic Posted August 25, 2008 Share Posted August 25, 2008 I found this on Slashdot today: http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.2386 Seems that somebody did find stellar spots (or at least a dip in the brightness), and mistook them for a giant Jupiter-like planet first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now