Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

On the thread: http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=34700 i guoted my letter to Nobel Laureat Stewen Weinberg with question "If space is discrete and time is continue,4-dimensional space-time lost its sense?" and his short answer "Yes".

When i read other Nobel Laureat Gerardus t' Hooft Lecture( see my thread:

http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=34730) and his doubt about power of Calculus on small distances i have question "If space is discrete and time is continue....how about ds/dt ? Also become meaningless?"

I used binary code for signify discrete and continue, see my thread:http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=34145.

I present ds/dt as 10/11 or 01/11 and i got 2/3 or1/3 look like charges of quarks. That made me more inquisitive.

The same time I remembered about Richard Feynman suspicion: "I rather suspect that the simple ideas of geometry, extended down into infinitely small space, are wrong" R.P. Feynman, The Character of Physical Law (The M.I.T. Press, 1990), p. 166.

So, by hints 3 Nobel Laureats i start thinking about use binary number for future exploring. I am also supported by John Wheeler's idea "It from Bit". Then i thought about mass.By binary i can signify space and time. How i can signify mass by binary?(Be continued)

 

P.S.Space is discrete.Time is continue. To face the fact D=3;1,2,3

Time D=1 only.

Edited by Yuri Danoyan
multiple post merged

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.