Yuri Danoyan Posted August 24, 2008 Posted August 24, 2008 (edited) On the thread: http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=34700 i guoted my letter to Nobel Laureat Stewen Weinberg with question "If space is discrete and time is continue,4-dimensional space-time lost its sense?" and his short answer "Yes". When i read other Nobel Laureat Gerardus t' Hooft Lecture( see my thread: http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=34730) and his doubt about power of Calculus on small distances i have question "If space is discrete and time is continue....how about ds/dt ? Also become meaningless?" I used binary code for signify discrete and continue, see my thread:http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=34145. I present ds/dt as 10/11 or 01/11 and i got 2/3 or1/3 look like charges of quarks. That made me more inquisitive. The same time I remembered about Richard Feynman suspicion: "I rather suspect that the simple ideas of geometry, extended down into infinitely small space, are wrong" R.P. Feynman, The Character of Physical Law (The M.I.T. Press, 1990), p. 166. So, by hints 3 Nobel Laureats i start thinking about use binary number for future exploring. I am also supported by John Wheeler's idea "It from Bit". Then i thought about mass.By binary i can signify space and time. How i can signify mass by binary?(Be continued) P.S.Space is discrete.Time is continue. To face the fact D=3;1,2,3 Time D=1 only. Edited August 24, 2008 by Yuri Danoyan multiple post merged
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now