Am I right or wrong?

[tivaelydoc]

Ok, so before god there was 0 dimensions, dark matter. Then, just like radioactive isotopes, then decided to split up like to hot climate and dark climate. Thus, big bang happened. Because, the antimatter changed into two different types of matter but some chilled out and stayed at dark matter. They created all 12 dimensions, the 1st 2nd and 3rd of inorganic matter, and 1st 2nd and 3rd dimension of organic matter. from there, the kept evolving and de-evolving to adapt to their environment. But, time is only an measurement. The 1st thru 3 dimension is only, like a piece of paper, inorganic. The 4th thru 6th dimension would be like a 1st dimension of time, unable to move, but still able to an organism.the 7th thru 9th would be the 2-d dimension of time, being able to move forward and backward thru time. this is where we as humans exist right now. that's what we are limited to and we can only control lower dimension. since an inorganic piece of paper can't change it's past or present, we as humans can change it because we can alternate it's shape. we can fold it thus creating a new present and it's past because it was different. but when we die, we move on to the 10th thru 12th dimension. this dimension only exists because there are alternate futures and pasts that we cannot exist. just because we can kick a rock, doesn't mean we are going to. this would also be were god exists and where spiritual religions like hinduism say we are god. evolution only follows a positive stream of genes, whereas big bang says we lost genes to adapt to our environment. but my theory states: that we gained genes to adapt, but at the same time lost genes because we didn't need them.

 

 

see time would just be like the number scale, - infinite to 0 (big bang) then + infinity.

 

thus, antimatter and dark matter would exist on a negative scale, always existing, just like our future exists on a positive scale.

 

ssorry, i'm like super faded and i'm just and undergraduate.

[swansont]

before god

 

This really isn't any kind of testable hypothesis.

 

 

 

there was 0 dimensions, dark matter. Then, just like radioactive isotopes, then decided to split up like to hot climate and dark climate. Thus, big bang happened. Because, the antimatter changed into two different types of matter but some chilled out and stayed at dark matter. They created all 12 dimensions, the 1st 2nd and 3rd of inorganic matter, and 1st 2nd and 3rd dimension of organic matter. from there, the kept evolving and de-evolving to adapt to their environment. But, time is only an measurement. The 1st thru 3 dimension is only, like a piece of paper, inorganic. The 4th thru 6th dimension would be like a 1st dimension of time, unable to move, but still able to an organism.the 7th thru 9th would be the 2-d dimension of time, being able to move forward and backward thru time. this is where we as humans exist right now. that's what we are limited to and we can only control lower dimension. since an inorganic piece of paper can't change it's past or present, we as humans can change it because we can alternate it's shape. we can fold it thus creating a new present and it's past because it was different. but when we die, we move on to the 10th thru 12th dimension. this dimension only exists because there are alternate futures and pasts that we cannot exist. just because we can kick a rock, doesn't mean we are going to. this would also be were god exists and where spiritual religions like hinduism say we are god. evolution only follows a positive stream of genes, whereas big bang says we lost genes to adapt to our environment. but my theory states: that we gained genes to adapt, but at the same time lost genes because we didn't need them.

 

 

see time would just be like the number scale, - infinite to 0 (big bang) then + infinity.

 

thus, antimatter and dark matter would exist on a negative scale, always existing, just like our future exists on a positive scale.

 

ssorry, i'm like super faded and i'm just and undergraduate.

 

 

I think this falls into the category of "Not right. Not even wrong." That's not meant as a put-down; the question "is this right" is ill-formed. Much of the science that's here is questionable as to whether it's right, and there is metaphysics, philosophy and pop-sci hypothesis mixed in that cannot be evaluated scientifically.

 

Try smaller bites, perhaps.