voodoochile Posted September 13, 2008 Author Posted September 13, 2008 (edited) what can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Thats a fair comment but so is innocent until proven guilty and I'm talking about the laws of physics which never change. So I'm right until somebody proves me wrong. Also, the majority of comments I recieve are about mental health and so on but they always give a mis diagnosis. I have ego mania because I really did everything I said I did and in the process answered all the greatest questions. Edited September 13, 2008 by voodoochile
Sayonara Posted September 13, 2008 Posted September 13, 2008 Thats a fair comment but so is innocent until proven guilty and I'm talking about the laws of physics which never change. So I'm right until somebody proves me wrong. No, that is not how it works. You don't seem to have much of a grasp of how scientific advances are progressed. Regardless of whether you are serious or this is some kind of satire, you are making yourself look very silly.
voodoochile Posted September 13, 2008 Author Posted September 13, 2008 I know enough. I know what I'm saying and the proof is there.
voodoochile Posted September 13, 2008 Author Posted September 13, 2008 yes it is. This happened almost exactly a year ago. I told a few people at the time but I was looking forward to telling people with the proof but I didnt sign a contract and got screwed. Thats how this sad old man ended up with it and thats why you have to believe me under these circumstances.
Sayonara Posted September 13, 2008 Posted September 13, 2008 (edited) We don't "have to" believe anything. If you have discovered some effect or entity hitherto unknown to science, you need to determine a means of demonstrating its existence and causation in a verifiable and repeatable fashion. Otherwise the claim is worthless. Edited September 13, 2008 by Sayonara³ multiple post merged
voodoochile Posted September 13, 2008 Author Posted September 13, 2008 Do what you like. You dont have to do anything. Thats my whole point. I want to do that and thats why I'm going to all this trouble. Which is why I'm asking for legal advice and how to make a new scientific discovery public.
Sayonara Posted September 13, 2008 Posted September 13, 2008 Thats my whole point. I want to do that and thats why I'm going to all this trouble. Right... so do you see how repeatedly claiming that the "proof" is in there does not make it look like you are investigating possible experimental methods?
voodoochile Posted September 13, 2008 Author Posted September 13, 2008 sayonara, your complicating things. Its all very simple, its just unbelieveable.
ydoaPs Posted September 13, 2008 Posted September 13, 2008 Then give us something to believe. And where is this "scientific proof"?
Sayonara Posted September 13, 2008 Posted September 13, 2008 (edited) its just unbelieveable Yes, it is. As is your resistance to the concept of testing ideas. Thread closed for the final time. Edited September 13, 2008 by Sayonara³ multiple post merged
Sisyphus Posted September 13, 2008 Posted September 13, 2008 sayonara, your complicating things. Its all very simple, its just unbelieveable. It's actually not even unbelievable. In order to be so, you would have to be making some coherent assertion which could be disbelieved. But your story is mostly just nonsense.
Recommended Posts