throng Posted September 18, 2008 Posted September 18, 2008 I have worked out the answer to the eternal questions: who am I? what am I? where am I? when am I? how am I? why am I? The only known solution is: when am I? = now. Multiply all equations by “now” so they are proportional to the known solution. Strangely enough they all have the same answer, as I’ll prove below. Who am I now? What am I now? Where am I now? How am I now? Why am I now? And the real doozy … When am I now? Then simplify the questions as shown below. Divide out the common symbols “w.h.a.m.I.?.” and find the solution: “oatereenoy”, by removing the question mark, but allow for variances in anagrams. We’d express this “atrny.e^3.o^2” of course. So, the solution to the eternal problems is: atrny.e^3.o^2. There is an uncertainty caused by anagram, and I can’t work out why y = why? after division by wh?. But I reckon I’ve just about cracked it!
insane_alien Posted September 18, 2008 Posted September 18, 2008 and what about other languages, such as chinese, french, german, spanish, afrikaans, japanese, indian, hebrew, etc. etc.
throng Posted September 18, 2008 Author Posted September 18, 2008 and what about other languages, such as chinese, french, german, spanish, afrikaans, japanese, indian, hebrew, etc. etc. if there's a question mark it can be divided out so you still get nonsence, but in a different language. I'm working on a relativity theory there.
insane_alien Posted September 18, 2008 Posted September 18, 2008 so you have nonsense. which means you haven't figured anything out at all. appart from the obvious problem of applying mathematical operations to a non numerical system which basically means its utter crap.
Sisyphus Posted September 18, 2008 Posted September 18, 2008 You've solved it! Now go forth and use this knowledge to serve humanity. Do not dally here! 1
big314mp Posted September 18, 2008 Posted September 18, 2008 and what about other languages, such as chinese, french, german, spanish, afrikaans, japanese, indian, hebrew, etc. etc. Indian? I'm not quite familiar with that language
insane_alien Posted September 18, 2008 Posted September 18, 2008 whoops, i meant hindi. sorry about that. basically i was meaning any non-english language.
I_Pwn_Crackpots Posted September 18, 2008 Posted September 18, 2008 This thread is about as intellectually stimulating as sniffing sharpies.
insane_alien Posted September 18, 2008 Posted September 18, 2008 well, it takes some rudimentary intelligence to remove the cap. so that has a one up on this thread right there.
insane_alien Posted September 18, 2008 Posted September 18, 2008 oh is that what you do with them. i've been sticking them up my nose. they usually come out again but 3 are missing.
JohnB Posted September 19, 2008 Posted September 19, 2008 It's an insidious plot to turn us all into Canadians. Look at the underhanded method in his multiplication; Who am iNow? What am iNow? Where am iNow? How am iNow? Why am iNow? When am iNow? (Not to mention appalling grammar.) It's a plot I tell you!!! *Thank you nurse, I'll have three of the blue ones today.*
Phi for All Posted September 19, 2008 Posted September 19, 2008 You've solved it! Now go forth and use this knowledge to serve humanity. Do not dally here!It'll be tough on the rest of us when throng leaves the nest, but I think it's the right thing to do. Let's not be selfish about this.
throng Posted September 21, 2008 Author Posted September 21, 2008 It has occurred to me: why? = y so wh? = 1 This means though the problem is solved, I think this could greatly reduce the anagram uncertainty.
insane_alien Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 throng, i suggest you stop wasting time on this and go learn some proper science.
YT2095 Posted September 21, 2008 Posted September 21, 2008 someone`s being a little bit silly aren`t they! Thread Closed.
Recommended Posts