Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I learned about what makes a good nucleophile.

But take a sample case

RCO2H

is the carbonyl oxygen more nucleophilic or the oxygen attached to the proton?

 

- they both have resonance (??)

Posted

The carbonyl oxygen would technically be more nucleophilic, as it has more electron density. However, it really isn't a very good nucleophile at all because the negative charge is distributed via resonance.

 

Something like an alkoxide (RO-, the conjugate base of an alcohol) is a much better nucleophile as the negative charge is all concentrated on one atom.

Posted

In carbonyl groups, the oxygen is double bonded to the carbon. There are two resonance structures for this. The first has a double bond, and no formal charges. The second has a single bond, a formal minus on the oxygen, and a formal plus on the carbon. This second structure is less favored than the first, due to the presence of the formal charges.

 

What those two resonance structures tell, is that the pi bond between the carbon and the oxygen is polarized towards the oxygen, thereby putting somewhat of a minus charge on the oxygen. Since this is only a partial minus charge, adding another bond will put a formal plus charge on the oxygen (or on the carbon if you move the pi electrons in the double bond to the oxygen). This type of structure is unfavorable, so the carbonyl oxygen is not nucleophilic.

Posted

Wait starpaste i think you mean in RCOOH?

if it is HO--C=O, i thought it would be the OH bc it is more basic than c==o. yet it the O in c=o is still the better nucleophile?

Posted

You really need the terms "soft" and "hard" when determining what is the best nucleophile.

 

Good nucleophiles are usually ( though not always) "soft". This means the electrons are in a diffuse orbital where the charge is spread out. Bad nucleophiles are usually "hard" where the orbital is tightly bound to the atom and thus can not "reach" easily into the electrophilic centre.

Since the OH oxygen has two sp3 lone pairs, which are more diffuse than the two sp2 orbitals on the carbonyl oxygen, I would expect the OH oxygen to be more nucleophilic.

 

The answer does depend to some extent on the electrophilic centre as some centres like hard nucleophiles.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.