marcut Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 I know Gamma ray has more energy, but I'm not sure why. Can someone explain it to me? I need to know this for a test on Tuesday.
Klaynos Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 It's todo with photons and wavelengths/frequencies. We define gamma rays as having a certain frequency range, and radio waves in the same way. These rays are quantised into photons. Each photon has an energy associated with it: E=hf For higher frequency the energy is higher. Gamma rays are defined as having a higher frequency (shorter wavelength) than radio waves and are therefore by definition higher in energy.
swansont Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 Gammas generally have higher energies, because they come from nuclear interactions which stem from a stronger coupling, so they almost always have higher energies than the interactions that give you radio waves.
marcut Posted November 9, 2008 Author Posted November 9, 2008 It's todo with photons and wavelengths/frequencies. We define gamma rays as having a certain frequency range, and radio waves in the same way. These rays are quantised into photons. Each photon has an energy associated with it: E=hf For higher frequency the energy is higher. Gamma rays are defined as having a higher frequency (shorter wavelength) than radio waves and are therefore by definition higher in energy. Thanks very much. Just, to put it in lower terms, it is because a gamma ray has a higher frequency which makes more energy? Does that sound good?
swansont Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 We define gamma rays as having a certain frequency range, and radio waves in the same way. Actually we don't. Gammas come from nuclear interactions. You can have X-rays with higher energies than gammas. Probably not Radio waves, though.
Klaynos Posted November 9, 2008 Posted November 9, 2008 Actually we don't. Gammas come from nuclear interactions. You can have X-rays with higher energies than gammas. Probably not Radio waves, though. This I did not know, thanks!
YT2095 Posted November 10, 2008 Posted November 10, 2008 I think the confusion comes from the common use of the term "X-ray", it`s often associated soley with the photographs taken of materials to give a negative plate or an X-Ray of it. and these can be done either with a gamma source OR an X-ray (or better called Rontgen rays). so the 2 end up geting bunched together as the same.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now