Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

i think that version is still in beta so its not worth using really until the final release (prob a few years). im just waiting for xp sp2.the advantages to longhorn would be a better gui and a few new features probably. ive noticed over the years they are making the gui look more like liunx and mac as they look and feel more comfortable.

Posted

MS have been ripping off the mac gui for years. No change there really :)

 

Can't really see any advantages of Longhorn atm, they seem to be stripping off most of the stuff and putting it into the next release (like the new sql based filesystem). Which means it'll probably never be implemented. Atm, it just looks like another 2000->XP job; keep everything the same and make it look pretty.

Posted

One of the greatest advantages is that most GUI stuff will now be handled by your graphics accelerator card, which will save tons of regular RAM and speed things up greatly.

Posted

To Everybody:

 

I have tried Windows Longhorn, and it is much slower than XP. It somehow looks like a combination of 2000 and XP. I think it is not suitable for advanced computer users, because some of the functions are forbidden and replaced by easy graphical user interafaces..............

 

Actually, I feel Windows XP pro is the "best" O.S. I have ever tried....

 

 

Just for a review about Longhorn

 

Any suggestion?

 

 

Albert

Posted

To be fair, that version that you've got is a very early beta at least, as MS has said Longhorn's not going to be out for quite some time yet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.