Demosthenes Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 according to E=Mc2, if we traveled close to the speed of light then time around us would slow(by us i mean the one traveling) if this is true, then we could live far past our life expectancy (at least, from anothers point of view we would seem ancient) we could travel away from earth at a constant speed and then return then we would be able to skip decades, centuries and in some cases millenia.
iNow Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 Yes, relative to those who are moving more slowly, we would seem to live longer. However, in our own reference frame (from our own perspective) time would seem to pass normally. Either way, did you have a question, or did you want to discuss something in particular?
Demosthenes Posted November 27, 2008 Author Posted November 27, 2008 more or less i was aiming at if it were possible to skip those amounts of time, i understand the toll of moving that fast, it would crush bones, but if we could get around that by canceling the force then we could have the most intelligent humans on the planet to live far longer and help the human race as a whole a lot longer. (with thier consent)
iNow Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 Yeah. Have you read about the twin paradox? It helped me understand the concept better. http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_intro.html Our story stars two twins, sometimes unimaginatively named A and B; we prefer the monikers Stella and Terence. Terence sits at home on Earth. Stella flies off in a spaceship at nearly the speed of light, turns around after a while, thrusters blazing, and returns. (So Terence is the terrestrial sort; Stella sets her sights on the stars.) When our heroes meet again, what do they find? More at link.
swansont Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 more or less i was aiming at if it were possible to skip those amounts of time, i understand the toll of moving that fast, it would crush bones, but if we could get around that by canceling the force then we could have the most intelligent humans on the planet to live far longer and help the human race as a whole a lot longer. (with thier consent) There is no "crushing bones" toll for moving fast. I am moving very close to the speed of light relative to some cosmic ray, and I don't feel a thing from that. The effect would be in accelerating, at more than a few g's, to a high speed. Probably don't need to preserve smart people this way — it's impractical, since you don't get the same output from them while they are traveling: if their dilation factor is 100, then their productivity drops to 1% of their normal output, all other things being the same. (They do a year's worth of work in 100 years of our time) We can make more smart people. We've done it before, and we'll do it again.
Baby Astronaut Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 Probably don't need to preserve smart people this way — it's impractical, since you don't get the same output from them while they are traveling: if their dilation factor is 100, then their productivity drops to 1% of their normal output, all other things being the same. (They do a year's worth of work in 100 years of our time) We can make more smart people. We've done it before, and we'll do it again. Then send the entire population away for a while and the smart people stay here and they do a 100 years work in one year of the population's time
swansont Posted November 27, 2008 Posted November 27, 2008 Then send the entire population away for a while and the smart people stay here and they do a 100 years work in one year of the population's time We'd rig the spaceships with Pauli Shore, Tom Arnold and Rosie O'Donnell on them to fly into the sun. Don't you watch the Simpsons?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now