Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah, they were trying to throw him out based on a vote of no confidence, and before they could, he just suspended the legislature. Apparently, the Queen of England even signed off on it.

Posted

Its not unreasonable. Give them seven weeks to cool down. If they still want to get rid of him after seven weeks, then they will. Sometimes important decisions should be taken with care, rather than on the spur of the moment.

Posted

Well the Governor General has the power, but there's always some debate on the context under which that power can be exercised.

Posted
Its not unreasonable. Give them seven weeks to cool down. If they still want to get rid of him after seven weeks, then they will. Sometimes important decisions should be taken with care, rather than on the spur of the moment.

 

I agree in theory, but it still seems like a bad idea. This is just going to make them angrier. And if they were vocally trying to oust before, they'd look foolish for backing off once they've been sent to the time out box. It would be like admitting childishness.

Posted

otoh, if their voters calm down then there'll be less democratic pressure on them to act aggressively/rashly to please their angry voters.

 

I always thought some kind of 'knee-jerk' rule, where, under certain circumstances, you could forbid paliament to discuss an issue for a month or two, would result in saner legislature.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.