Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Think about it. If you hung a bunch of gold from a spring scale on the moon (where gravity is weaker and doesn't pull as hard), would you need more or less gold to make the scale read "1N" compared to being on the moon?

Posted
Think about it. If you hung a bunch of gold from a spring scale on the moon (where gravity is weaker and doesn't pull as hard), would you need more or less gold to make the scale read "1N" compared to being on the moon?

 

Using the equation weight(N) = mass x accel. due to gravity yields the following (I hope)

 

Moon

1N/1.6m/s^2 = 0.625kg

 

Earth

1N/9.81m/s^2 = 0.102kg

 

 

So it looks like to requires more gold on the Moon!

 

Thanks:-)

Posted

I'm thinking along the same lines as Phi here though. On earth, obviously the 0.625kg lump will sell for alot more. But I would rather own 0.102kg of gold here on earth than have to deal with the delivery cost of transporting your 0.625kg from the moon.

 

I don't think it is supposed to be a trick question though.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I assume there a simple answer to this:

[math]Q=mg[/math]

[math]m=\frac{Q}{g}[/math]

A decrease in gravitational acceleration means an increase in the mass (as long as we have Q constant which is our case), so I guess its worth more on Moon!

Posted
Relative to what?

 

Well, i remember reading recently, that if you could collect all the gold in the world, it would only be enough to fill three entire football stadiums.

 

A Newton has about the same weight as a Granny Smith Apple, and that would be like a nugget on a good day in the American Rocky Mountains.

Posted
Well, i remember reading recently, that if you could collect all the gold in the world, it would only be enough to fill three entire football stadiums.

 

A Newton has about the same weight as a Granny Smith Apple, and that would be like a nugget on a good day in the American Rocky Mountains.

An objection which has squat to do with the premise of the question posed in the OP. And if you *are* talking about value, as DrP points out, 0.625kg is quite a bit when you have to factor it as part of the payload of a Moon trip.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.