falcon9393 Posted December 11, 2008 Posted December 11, 2008 A cloned Pig in china gave birth to 11 piggies and two of them glow in the dark!!! If they grow cloned organs will those glow in the dark to? Will cloned meat or organs me any good? Check this out! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22563650/ 1
iNow Posted December 11, 2008 Posted December 11, 2008 IIRC, they glow because they incorporated DNA from cephalopods, not just because they were "cloned." (although, that would be pretty cool)
Psycho Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 Is it a protein in fire flies or something else as that should really be incorporated into the DNA of a foreign organism as that would be awesome.
Gilded Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 Is it a protein in fire flies or something else as that should really be incorporated into the DNA of a foreign organism as that would be awesome. Fireflies rely on bioluminescence, what we have here is just fluorescence due to the green fluorescent protein. I'd imagine making something chemiluminescent would require a significant amount of genetic manipulation. But yes, it would be awesome.
Phi for All Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 It'd be pretty sweet to wake up and make breakfast without having to turn on the lights.
Gilded Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 It'd be pretty sweet to wake up and make breakfast without having to turn on the lights. I wonder how long it will be before McDonald's etc. start making fluorescent bacon/ham burgers.
Sayonara Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 You have to wonder what was going through the researcher's minds. - Hey Clive, this cloning thing is being done to death at the moment. - You're right Dennis. What else can we do? - I know... let's make them glow!
Phi for All Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 It'd be pretty sweet to wake up and find out Dennis made me a McGlone sandwich for breakfast without having to turn on the lights. Or not.
npts2020 Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 Scientific American had an article about this a couple of months ago. If I remember rightly, the researchers inserted jellyfish genes into a pig embryo. I think the green glowing was under UV light, but still a pretty impressive accomplishment.
Mr Skeptic Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 I don't think that you will have glowing ham sandwiches or bacon. Green Fluorescent Protein is a protein and cooking it would denature it and most likely remove its fluorescent abilities. Plus, you'd need a black light to see it glow anyways. Of course, eating it would be no different than eating any other protein.
CharonY Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 IIRC, they glow because they incorporated DNA from cephalopods, not just because they were "cloned." Incorporating DNA into a genome that way is a cloning experiment. Fireflies rely on bioluminescence Well in theory you could clone the required protein (luciferase) the same way as you would GFP. The main problem might be to get the substrate (luciferin) to the cells.
npts2020 Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 If I am not mistaken they said the whole pig, even the meat would glow. What cooking would do to its glowing I wouldn't speculate and tasting it to see if it is the same or safe I will leave for others.
Mr Skeptic Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 Why? What is it about that particular protein that you are so afraid of? You eat thousands of different kinds of proteins all the time, what is so special about this one?
npts2020 Posted December 13, 2008 Posted December 13, 2008 Why? What is it about that particular protein that you are so afraid of? You eat thousands of different kinds of proteins all the time, what is so special about this one? Other than my being a vegetarian, there is probably nothing wrong with it. Likewise, chickens with four wings, cloned beef, or any other abberation of an animal you can think of. Not that I think that those are any worse than the "normal" meat for eating, they are just not on the menu.
Mr Skeptic Posted December 13, 2008 Posted December 13, 2008 Um, plants are full of proteins as well. They have a lower proportion of proteins because they use cellulose for their cell walls, whereas animal cells don't have a cell wall so are mostly protein. It wouldn't surprise me if plants have a larger variety of proteins than animals. And as for aberrations, you do realize that most of the plants you eat are aberrations, right? For example compare our food corn with wild corn. All those seedless fruits (eg banana) are aberrations of nature and would never survive without our interference. Many flowers are aberrations as well, having twice as many petals as they should in place of other flower parts. But of course it is the animal aberrations you worry about.
iNow Posted December 13, 2008 Posted December 13, 2008 Likewise, chickens with four wings, cloned beef, or any other abberation of an animal you can think of. Yummy... Reading this made my mouth water. I mean, a chicken with four legs? I might start believing in god if there were such a thing available. Well, maybe I would not go THAT far, but it would still totally rock. Also, I'd like someone to clone me a t-bone steak that doesn't cause heart disease. Hell yeah! Pass the genetically modified sweet corn while you're at it, and the genetically modified strawberries for desert. If they glow too, that's just a bonus and I can save on electricity while I eat.
Phi for All Posted December 13, 2008 Posted December 13, 2008 Yummy... Reading this made my mouth water. I mean, a chicken with four legs?Tyson bred chickens with four legs decades ago. They don't sell them because they can't catch them.
npts2020 Posted December 14, 2008 Posted December 14, 2008 There are far better reasons to be a vegetarian than any concern for cows or chickens. It is a personal choice I don't expect anyone else to follow unless they care to for their own reasons. Whether any "aberration" of an animal or plant is a good or bad thing, I think is an entirely different subject of discussion. Other than proof of concept, I see little reason to make pigs flourescent. Whether this is good or bad, I guess you would have to consult with a bio-ethicist (kinda like asking the preacher if it's ok).
Mr Skeptic Posted December 14, 2008 Posted December 14, 2008 Most likely it is for research purposes. Green Fluorescent Protein is used so much in biology research, that there was a Nobel prize given for its discovery. The pigs would likely be inferior to farm pigs in that they make a useless (to them) protein, thought they might be able to be sold at a higher price as a novelty item. According to the article, the objective is for organ transplants that allow tracking the foreign cells due to their fluorescence. "He said the presence of the green protein would allow genetically modified cells to be tracked if they were transplanted into a human."
npts2020 Posted December 15, 2008 Posted December 15, 2008 Bio-tagging was the reason I had heard also but there is probably a host of uses for similar types of tagging other than flourescence as well. Why brand your cattle when you can just have them flouresce?
Ulna Posted December 17, 2008 Posted December 17, 2008 (edited) That is amazingly cool, glowing pigs, but is it a useful thing to do? I mean is the technology useful or is it just a bit of fun? Whats IIRC i'm seeing it everywhere in these forums, it looks familiar like a molecular biology term but i can't find any of my molecular biology text books. Edited December 17, 2008 by Ulna
iNow Posted December 17, 2008 Posted December 17, 2008 Whats IIRC i'm seeing it everywhere in these forums, it looks familiar like a molecular biology term but i can't find any of my molecular biology text books. IIRC = "If I recall correctly..." It's just shorthand for online communication, like BRB = Be Right Back... Not related to biology at all.
CharonY Posted December 17, 2008 Posted December 17, 2008 IIRC = if I recall correctly And the paper was basically a proof of principle paper. It was possible to transfect somatic pig cells with a vector carrying a GFP gene and promoter and let the cell express it. Afterwards the nucleus was transplanted into denucleated oocytes. This precise setup is not likely to be useful, but it demonstrates that it is feasible. More useful experiments would include site-specific insertions (or fusions) so that expression can be tracked in vivo. Edit: too slow...
jason fielding Posted December 18, 2008 Posted December 18, 2008 Is it a protein in fire flies or something else as that should really be incorporated into the DNA of a foreign organism as that would be awesome. biochemical luminescence going off line-C U later Jason314:cool:Later on:doh:!!!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now