Why?

[liber_scientia]

Really. Why?

[Gilded]

I'm afraid that falls within the realm of philosophy. Feel free to discuss "How?" though.

[DrP]

Or "What?" could be a good start?

[Royston]

  liber_scientia said:

Really. Why?

 

Because I said so.

[iNow]

Z.

 

Now, we're done.

[Sisyphus]

How about just, "huh?"

[Phi for All]

  liber_scientia said:

Really. Why?

No reason.

 

 

 

 

 

Seriously, try this answer out for all why-type questions. It works.

[npts2020]

  Phi for All said:

No reason.

 

 

 

 

 

Seriously, try this answer out for all why-type questions. It works.

 

 

Or you could take the parents' line......'cause I said so.

[YT2095]

Because it`s There.

[Phi for All]

  npts2020 said:

Or you could take the parents' line......'cause I said so.

That's what Snail said in post #4, and he's not a parent, apparently.

 

 

 

But "No reason" works for, "Why do bad things happen to good people?" as well as, "Why did George Bush get elected twice?" The difference is in whether you shrug your shoulders or tap your skull when saying, "No reason".

[liber_scientia]

Apparently.

[thedarkshade]

  liber_scientia said:

Really. Why?

Why not!

[aguy2]

  liber_scientia said:

Really. Why?

I have been contending that the large scale meaning and purpose of reality is what I have been calling either "Self-Creation" or, of late, "Self-Engenderment".

 

With "Self-Engenderment" being defined as, "giving rise to itself without assistance". see http://www.self-engenderment.com

aguy2

[john5746]

  liber_scientia said:

Really. Why?

 

No.

[Cap'n Refsmmat]

  liber_scientia said:

Really. Why?

 

Penguin.

[J.C.MacSwell]

  liber_scientia said:

Really. Why?

 

cause

 

also be

[JohnB]

  Quote

Really. Why?

Can't answer until you tell me who and when.

[the tree]

The correct answer is for the LULZ.