Gareth56 Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 I've tried distributing etc but cannot get the correct answer of 60.1N My book doesn't give the steps. Tsin37 + (1.33T)(sin53) - 100N =0 I never know what to do with the (1.33T)(sin53) Any assistance would really be appreciated.
Petanquell Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 is it [math] T*\sin{37}+1.33*T*\sin{53}-100N=0[/math] ? Eventually, can I use 4/3 exept 1,33 ?
Gareth56 Posted January 7, 2009 Author Posted January 7, 2009 Anything you like if you can explain it
Petanquell Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Ok, i'll try First of all, I coversed degrees to radians [math]T*\sin(37\pi/180)+\frac{4}{3}*T*\sin(53\pi/180)-100N = 0[/math] [math]T*\sin(37\pi/180)+\frac{4}{3}*T*\sin(53\pi/180)=100N[/math] [math]T(\sin(37\pi/180)+\frac{4}{3}*\sin(53\pi/180))=100N[/math] [math]T=\frac{100}{\sin(37\pi/180)+\frac{4}{3}*\sin(53\pi/180)}N[/math] And aproximate... pq
Shadow Posted January 8, 2009 Posted January 8, 2009 I made my own calculations, and the result differed from yours, so I checked with Maple, and it confirmed what I got... [math]T={\frac {300N}{3\,\sin \left( 37 \right) +4\,\sin \left( 53 \right) }}[/math] If you need the steps, let me know.
the tree Posted January 8, 2009 Posted January 8, 2009 Those are clearly equivialant, the only difference is the RHS is multiplied by [imath]\frac{3}{3}[/imath]. I don't see why you would want to convert to radians, all that is doing is introducing another stage where errors are going to build up. [math]T=\frac{100N}{\sin(37)+1.33\sin(53)}[/math] Is fine, but to reduce rounding errors you'll want to reduce the amount of operations that you ultimately perform. If you note that [imath]\sin(37)=\cos(53)[/imath] (probably not a coincidence), then you can get a nice little polynomial in the denominator. [math]T=\frac{100N}{1-\sin^2(53)+1.33\sin(53)}[/math] And this means that you are only evaluating one sine term instead of two.
Petanquell Posted January 8, 2009 Posted January 8, 2009 Well , we haven't learned trigonimetric functions yet so I can't see it there. But I'll take a look sometime... And that conversation, I don't remember why I did it. Maybe because Maple doesn't take degrees, really don't know. pq
Shadow Posted January 8, 2009 Posted January 8, 2009 Why, oh why did I miss that [math]4/3[/math] in your result Pq...apologies.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now