Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Do you mean the force between nucleons or between quarks?

 

The force between nucleons is in the low momentum part of and is generally not very well understood. Methods from exact renormalisation group flow, lattice field theory and effective field theory can be applied. This is a subject that is currently under much investigation.

Posted

It depends on the energy/momentum scale, the coupling decreases as the energy increases.

Posted (edited)

How about a ground state hydrogen atom's quarks


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

I'm just thinking there should be a way to calculate the strong force between quarks (in proton) with it's relativistic energy. Wouldn't a quark's bond strength be equal to its hadrons mass-energy?

Edited by gre
Consecutive post/s merged.
Posted

I don't know. At low energies/momentum QCD is strongly coupled and so perturbative methods fail, including the idea that a proton is simply made of quarks.

Posted (edited)

Why couldn't something like this work:

 

F(binding_proton) = (p * E)/hbar

 

E=(protonmass*cc^2)

p=(protonmass*cc)

 

 

Using this equation, the total binding energy between all quarks (in a proton), would be:

 

F(binding_proton) = 714795.07 N

 

 

Then you could get the proton mass-energy by multiplying:

 

F(binding_electron) * 1.3214095e-15 m / (2*pi) = 1.503e-10 J (or torque)

 

 

I did the same for the electron, and got F(binding_electron) = .212013 N ..

multiply by the Compton wavelength of the electron, you get .511 MeV.

 

I thought this was a strange coincidence: F(binding_electron) * (alpha^4/4) meters = 1.503e-10 J

Edited by gre
Posted

If you consider the bag model of a proton, it takes something like 1 GeV per fermi to "pull out" a quark. (I think this is phenomenologically determined)

 

I think that is about [math]1.6 \times 10^{5}[/math] Newtons. Please check that I have converted that right.

Posted (edited)

Can you give me an example?


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

F = (p * E)/hbar

 

F = (protonmass^2 * c^3)/hbar = 714795.07 Newtons

 

This looks a lot like a Planck constant. Can Planck constants represent a maximum as well?


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

I was just informed the strong force between quarks (in newtons) is to the order 100,000 newtons. Which agrees with my calculation.

 

Any comments?

Edited by gre
Consecutive post/s merged.
Posted

I just read you can also multiply the energy density by the area to get a rough estimate.


Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

ajb, did you come up with an exact number for the strong force (newtons) within a proton?

 

Thanks.

 

 

Greg

Posted

No, I did not come up with it, it has been taken from a reference. I believe it comes from a bag or potential model that is then fixed phenomenologically. I don't know if you can easily get such a figure directly from QCD.

Posted

Here is another way to write it. I doubt this is valid either.

 

F = (m * (c^2 / r)) (centripetal force)

 

or

 

F = E/r

 

E = relativistic energy

r = Compton wavelength / (2*pi)

  • 2 years later...
Posted

Magnitude of the other forces.

 

 

Electromagnetic Force: 1,000 newtons

 

 

Weak Force: .01 newtons

 

 

Gravitational Force: [math].10^{-33}[/math] newtons

 

 

Those are my guesses on each force's approximate strength within a distance of 1 femtometer.

 

Perhaps not everything is electromagnetic but, at least the strong force is as shown here

Posted

Perhaps not everything is electromagnetic but, at least the strong force is as shown here

 

!

Moderator Note

Interesting definition of "shown;" we're going for explanations that are more widely accepted and supported

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.