ExtraSense Posted May 8, 2004 Share Posted May 8, 2004 Lauren, Those nitwits that claim there is no life on mars, are just that. There is a chance that they are computer programs, with learning algorithm diabled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted May 9, 2004 Share Posted May 9, 2004 Lauren' date=' Those nitwits that claim there is no life on mars, are just that. There is a chance that they are computer programs, with learning algorithm diabled [/quote'] Are you actually going to post anything useful at some point, or just spam until we ban you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted May 9, 2004 Author Share Posted May 9, 2004 #3 seems to think he is an authority Three geniuses like that in one UK... That is too much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted May 9, 2004 Share Posted May 9, 2004 Yeah, you're talking to scientists. This is an astronomy forum, not an unfounded bollocks and ad hominem smarminess forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted May 13, 2004 Share Posted May 13, 2004 Moderators: where the thread does not belong to ES, just delete his o/t replies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 13, 2004 Share Posted May 13, 2004 Personally I think we should just restrict him to pseudoscience, but that's just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted May 13, 2004 Share Posted May 13, 2004 That carries a risk of creating a King Pseudoscientist, like Adam et al, but I'm happy with that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 13, 2004 Share Posted May 13, 2004 Well, who reads PS anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted May 13, 2004 Author Share Posted May 13, 2004 dave, Would not you think this thing will bite you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 13, 2004 Share Posted May 13, 2004 Well, no. It's a bit of odd-shaped rock that bears a resemblance to a skull - there's lots of odd shaped rocks around here that look like things as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted May 13, 2004 Author Share Posted May 13, 2004 Dave, As a Math Moderator, you should be able to calculate that chances of life on mars are higher, than chances of finding a rock that is shaped as a skull. Here the teeth are only slightly colored. Obviously, they are present on the original: ES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aman Posted May 14, 2004 Share Posted May 14, 2004 I love to search riverbeds here in Nebraska for artifacts and constantly find stones that look like perfect human faces and heads naturally formed. I even have a bald quartz round head with eyes and nose and a perfect granite beard. I wish I had a digital microscope to show you pictures of some micro-grains that could only be natural that are scary skulls. It would be great to say they were carved but there are just too many of them. Go to a creek and see for youself. You'll find a dozen skulls and heads and profiles in an hour in any creek bed. Just aman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 14, 2004 Share Posted May 14, 2004 Dave' date=' As a Math Moderator, you should be able to calculate that chances of life on mars are higher, than chances of finding a rock that is shaped as a skull.[/quote'] Why don't you take a stats course and find out how difficult it would actually be to calculate that probability? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted May 14, 2004 Author Share Posted May 14, 2004 I even have a bald quartz round head with eyes and nose and a perfect granite beard. I wish I had a digital microscope to show you pictures of some micro-grains that could only be natural that are scary skulls. Listen, you are not telling me that you have actual skull of stone, that is not a fossil? I mean that is empty inside, has teeth and the rest of it? You must have a picture of that treasure to share with us. And your credibility is seriously in stake ES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted May 14, 2004 Author Share Posted May 14, 2004 As a Math Moderator, you should be able to calculate that chances of life on mars are higher, than chances of finding a rock that is shaped as a skull. Why don't you take a stats course and find out how difficult it would actually be to calculate that probability? As a physicist, I tell you that it is easy to do: We have any number of skulls found on Earth, but no skull shaped rocks, during the milleniums of observation.. Which means that chances of forming a "skull shaped rocks" are about zero. Which means that if we have found something "skull shaped", the probability that it is not a rock is about 1.0 Which means that probability that it is "skull shaped skull" is about 1.0! Which means that probability that there was life on Mars is about 1.0! This is the way to do it, my learned friend. ES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 14, 2004 Share Posted May 14, 2004 We have any number of skulls found on Earth, but no skull shaped rocks, during the milleniums of observation.. rofl That's the funniest piece of stats I've seen all year. To be honest I'm not going to bother arguing with you any more. If you believe that load of tripe you just posted, there's probably something wrong with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aman Posted May 14, 2004 Share Posted May 14, 2004 Howdy ES, I have a perfectly formed white quartz head with eyes, nose and mouth and black granite beard about the size of a marble. If you spend a few hours in creek beds looking at thousands of rocks you find stuff that will blow you away. Ask any rock hound to show you his/her oddities. I'm trying to invest in a special camera to document some of my finds from the last 15 years. Don't doubt my credibility since I offered you the proof with the tiniest bit of effort on your part or just call a rockhound and ask. I didn't say a natural hollow skull of rock, I was commenting on the rock formation on Mars I thought was the subject of your discussion. Are you saying it's hollow? Just aman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted May 14, 2004 Author Share Posted May 14, 2004 Aman, I was asking for a picture, clear enough to support your claim. Any fisherman or stone hunter tells those stories, so it is fine. But nobody takes them serious too, unless hard proof is provided ES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted May 14, 2004 Share Posted May 14, 2004 Listen... your credibility is seriously in stake Ahhhhhh ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaa! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admiral_ju00 Posted May 14, 2004 Share Posted May 14, 2004 We have any number of skulls found on Earth, but no skull shaped rocks, during the milleniums of observation.. really? interesting. what then, would you say about these? http://perso.club-internet.fr/poissond/a42p23.jpg http://www.garot.com/travels/2002/2002_Nov_JoshuaTree/images/2002_nov_8_18_mini_skull_rock.jpg http://www.garot.com/travels/2002/2002_Nov_JoshuaTree/images_3.asp so i guess your elaborate physics problem/solution in post # 15 is now reduced to rubble, but thanks for playin. Originally Posted by ExtraSenseListen... your credibility is seriously in stake this is so funny, that it's true. only thing is, you must have been thinking of your own self when you posted that. and i guess these were created by aliens. http://www.transmitmedia.com/images/gallery/rocks.jpg http://earth.geol.ksu.edu/sgao/g100/plots/1010_sedi_example_Arizona.jpg http://www.chellman.org/~whim/octnov02/images/09-tent-rocks.jpg http://www.the-imagineer.com/images/Photography/AZ-Rocks.jpg http://www.discoveringromania.ro/gallery/img/picture/munte/27.jpg http://www.wilderness-wales.co.uk/urw/expedition11/dp14.jpg http://www.scsc.k12.ar.us/2002ArkNatHist/Projects/LachowskyR/Images/Lizard%20Rock2.jpg http://www.richardandjo.com/images/fishrock.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 14, 2004 Share Posted May 14, 2004 But nobody takes them serious too, unless hard proof is provided Which is probably the reason that we think you're 7 cans short of a six pack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted May 14, 2004 Share Posted May 14, 2004 so i guess your elaborate physics problem/solution in post # 15 is now reduced to rubble' date=' but thanks for playin. [/quote'] ROFLOL, You`re a cruel man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted May 14, 2004 Share Posted May 14, 2004 Well, it's true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Demosthenes- Posted May 15, 2004 Share Posted May 15, 2004 In all honesty those pictures kind of look like ice cream to me. I don't know about you, but that is a picture of ice cream, for sure. I could swear that it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtraSense Posted May 15, 2004 Author Share Posted May 15, 2004 I am sure you are talking about this picture: ES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts