swansont Posted June 4, 2009 Posted June 4, 2009 Spacetime already supports that much energy. Consider that E = mc^2 does not apply only to antimatter: all of the matter around you is tightly bundled energy. If you anhilate matter and anti-matter, you're really just spreading the energy density out thinner. That's true of any explosive, though. But having the energy densely stored as a chemical potential is a lot more comfortable than having it present more diffusely as thermal and kinetic energy.
AlexTehManiac Posted June 4, 2009 Posted June 4, 2009 Shure they have one its called ( The Hadron Accelerator ) to create a Black hole called the start of another universe within our universe. Mite take us all with it. Like we never were her in the begining. Actually, I believe it is really called the "Large Hadron Collider" that creates the black holes yes?
swansont Posted June 4, 2009 Posted June 4, 2009 Actually, I believe it is really called the "Large Hadron Collider" that creates the black holes yes? Yes, but OTOH, no, it won't. But that off-topic for this thread, and has been brought up elsewhere.
dragonstar57 Posted July 2, 2010 Posted July 2, 2010 (edited) whenever antimatter bombs are discussed people always talk about a bomb weighing about 1 lb having a yield of 4 times that of the largest nuclear detonation. but no one mentions a very small devise with the same yield as say 200lbs of TNT. how would such a devise be (without containment) dust particle size? with that kind of punch in such a small size its worth discussion Edited July 2, 2010 by cipher510
Mr Skeptic Posted July 2, 2010 Posted July 2, 2010 The energy is given by E=mc^2, just remember to double m because an equal amount of matter as antimatter is annihilated. You can multiply them in Google Calculator like so (for a 300 gram bomb), and then put the result into the Joules to Megatons Conversion Calculator
swansont Posted July 2, 2010 Posted July 2, 2010 Virtually all of the size of such a device would be the containment vessel. That could be about the size of a beer can, and would be many orders of magnitude more difficult and expensive to construct than a normal bomb of similar yield.
dragonstar57 Posted May 18, 2011 Posted May 18, 2011 the idea is to have a small high explosive that can be smuggled/hidden. an explosive that can be easily hidden but also has a relatively high yield would be a valuable weapon weather (idk if i used the right weather here) it be for a lighter faster missile or for a tactical sabotage
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now