Garry Denke Posted May 28, 2004 Posted May 28, 2004 Stonehenge SUMMER SOLSTICE 2004 Following are some names of the many Stonehenge investigators who failed to published the presence of Carboniferous White Limestone, Carboniferous Pale Grit and Carboniferous Black Coal at the Stonehenge monument. The geologic outcrop at Stonehenge is Cretaceous White Chalk, just in case you forgot. Reason for their failure? None of these Stonehenge investigators knew about them. So the point is, why not go see for yourself what they missed, at the Stonehenge SUMMER SOLSTICE 2004 (now that you know their exact locations, and rough amounts) http://www.bentley-kemp.com/Weston/stonehenge/images/stnhng%20pansheep_jpg.jpg Aiding in the celebration, so that all may see such missed Stonehenge rocks at night, is English Heritage, who has generously granted the Public free parking and free admission beginning 2200 hours (10:00 p.m.) Sunday 20th June on Father's Day night. So go if you can, it is defintely an extended weekend event. Join the midnight party round the 32.5 tons of Black Coal circling big roundtop mound along A-344 [100 metres (109 yards, 328 feet) E-SE of 04:58 Sunrise Heelstone]. The Black Coal in that Pale Grit covered trench is right under your two (2') feet. http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/default.asp?wci=MainFrame&URL1=http%3A//www.english-heritage.org.uk/default.asp%3FWCI%3DNode%26wce%3D8551%26nolog%3Dtrue REPORT ON THE EXCAVATIONS AT STONEHENGE DURING THE SEASON OF 1923 William Hawley (1851-1941) Antiquaries Journal. J., 5 1925 21-50 (No Carboniferous White Limestone, Carboniferous Pale Grit or Carboniferous Black Coal published therein) STONEHENGE R.J.C. Atkinson (1920-1994) PENGUIN BOOKS in association with Hamish Hamilton 1956 ISBN 0140136460 (No Carboniferous White Limestone, Carboniferous Pale Grit or Carboniferous Black Coal published therein) STONEHENGE in its landscape - twentieth-century excavations Rosamund M J Cleal, K E Walker, and R Montague with major contributions by Michael J Allen, Alex Bayliss, C Bronk Ramsey, Linda Coleman, Julie Gardiner, P A Harding, Rupert Housley, Andrew J Lawson, Gerry McCormac, Jacqueline I McKinley, Andrew Payne, Robert G Scaife, Dale Serjeantson, and Geoff Wainwright ENGLISH HERITAGE 1995 ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT 10 ISBN 1850746052 (No Carboniferous White Limestone, Carboniferous Pale Grit or Carboniferous Black Coal published therein) PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY . 92 Science and Stonehenge Edited by BARRY CUNLIFFE & COLIN RENFREW Published for THE BRITISH ACADEMY by OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1997 ISBN 0197261744 (No Carboniferous White Limestone, Carboniferous Pale Grit or Carboniferous Black Coal published therein) HENGEWORLD Mike Pitts C CENTURY . LONDON 2000 ISBN 0712679545 (No Carboniferous White Limestone, Carboniferous Pale Grit or Carboniferous Black Coal published therein) PENN GRIT / PENN COAL
Garry Denke Posted May 29, 2004 Author Posted May 29, 2004 Dr. Garry Denke's Claim Markers*** Circling/Over Artifacts North Western Europe Neolithic stone circles, henges, barrows, and causewayed camps' first purpose were coal exploration sites, being the remains of diggings that yielded no coal. Stones were placed in the smaller test holes, the 'stone circles', because they would silt in much faster than the deeper coal test trenches, the 'henges, barrows and causewayed camps, having no need of markers, due to their larger size. This is how the Stone Age miners recorded where not to dig in exploration for coal again, at such depths where none was previously found. No maps or coordinates were available to them in comparison to the tools used by explorationists today to record dug and abandoned sites. Given the greater quantity of 'stone circles' on the landscape, in relation to the other methods, the 'stone circling' mining exploration technique was the most popular, for it required much less digging work, and time, to evaluate potential coal bearing sites. The different patterns observable today are the result of various Neolithic coal mining exploration techniques, being the four general types mentioned. However, at some of the coal 'stone circles' exploration sites, such as Avebury, ancient miners did actually go back to retest their coal prospects sometimes, digging again in different places and depths, being convinced that a second try would yield the much needed coal, in spite of past failure. At Avebury, for instance, evidence suggests the ancient miners went back using a different technique on another go around, resulting in a 'henge' with two 'stone circles'. But alas, no coal at the populated, energy poor, Avebury. Centuries later many of these prehistoric mining exploration sites were utilized for various purposes that are well known, which anthropologists and archaeologists study in great detail, however no one has developed a comprehensive and conclusive underlying reason for these coal exploration sites in North Western Europe. This is partly because no anthropologist or archaeologist suggested, knew of, or presented any evidence of coal stone being used for any purpose in the Neolithic, and coal's actual first usage as simple campfire fuel remained hidden. Lack of evidence resulted in limiting its primary use to smelting metals, which prehistorically is untrue. The "Stone Age Coal Mining Theory" is based on the color difference of a black rock (coal) and a white rock (limestone), which currently Stonehenge anthropologists and archaeologists maintain are the same, the Theory chalking in the missing record, in black and white, of the exploration, production, and earliest usage of coal in North Western Europe. First evidence of black coal and white limestone being known in Neolithic time was discovered by the German historian, antiquarian, and Doctor Garry Denke (1622-1699), inventor of the core barrel, who cored the circular Stonehenge Mound Ditch located 100 meters (109 yards, 328 feet) E-SE of Heelstone. Roughly 58,967 kilograms (130,000 pounds) 42 cubic-meters (1,476 cubic-feet) of black Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Westphalian Crosskeys Coal and pale-yellow Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Namurian Millstone Grit rammed in a 113 meters (~369 feet) circumference ditch in white Late Cretaceous (Santonian) Seaford Chalk outcrop around a high mound pile of white Early Carboniferous (Arundian) High Tor (Birnbeck) Limestone had been found. Because Crosskeys black coal does not outcrop naturally at Stonehenge, its presence with pale-yellow Millstone Grit in the bottom-half of this man-made ditch around a white High Tor (Birnbeck) Limestone reef-like mound situated on a seaward sloping hill suggests Stonehenge was a geologic mining school built during that ancient quest for campfire fuel in energy poor North Western Europe's cold climate unforested areas. The main problem with the generally accepted first cause 'sun worship' theories of anthropologists and archaeologists is this: sun-filled winter days were, and still are, freezing cold during the day time; their so-called 'sun god' had let them down. The Stone Age Coal Mining Theory adheres to the fact that "Coal is a Stone" claiming that it was their hottest 'fire god' that never let the Neolithic people down, especially on sun-filled freezing cold winter days in the Stone Age. Stonehenge Mound circled by Millstone Grit and Westphalian Coal http://homepages.enterprise.net/sisman/PHOTOs/StoneH1.jpg (Foreground E-SE Stonehenge Mound and Background is Stonehenge) The Mound Ditch Coal is from South Wales Coalfield's Crosskeys http://www.xkeys.freeserve.co.uk/geology/coalfield.gif (Stonehenge Altar Stone from Red, Stonehenge Mound from Blue, Stonehenge Grit from Pale-Yellow at Rim, and Stonehenge Coalstone from Black at Rim) Neolithic Coalfield Quest for Campfire Coal in North Western Europe http://www.anima.demon.co.uk/img/megalithdist.gif (Non-Productive Coal Stone Sites in Blue) http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ross.cuthbertson/geol_sw/map%20uk%20coal.jpg (Productive Coal Stone Sites in Black) Today Explorationists Just use Maps to Record Non-Productive Sites http://www.geo.wvu.edu/~jtoro/Petroleum/petroleum_figs/game/fig3.jpg (Clear Circles having Quarter-circle Pegs are Non-Productive Sites) The Stone Age Coal Mining Theory first exposed South Wales Coalfield rim as the hot play for Neolithic coal stone open-pit miners who gathered coal for campfire fuel. There are no pre-Neolithic or Neolithic stone circles, henges, barrows, or causewayed camps on or along the sides of this basin's outer rims. Why is that? The answer is there was no need to explore the rim because bituminous coal is along an easy to see narrow 'road' between black coal and white limestone. This area could quite possibly be the original discovery area of 'old black magic' itself, the first coal ignited with a wood fuel campfire built on a coal seam by chance. There has to be some reason the white Mississippian Limestone, Old Red Sandstone, black Carboniferous Coal, and pale-yellow Pennsylvanian Grit were brought to Stonehenge from this area in South Wales, don't you think? According to the Doctor, who examined the Old Red Sandstone Altar Stone and gathered samples by pale and horse, at Stonehenge, and from along South Wales' pale-yellow Millstone Grit circular rim road, counterclockwise in 1656, with black Coal to his left, and white Lime to his right; "To find coal here," he said, "Just follow the pale 'Grit' road, follow the pale 'Grit' road, follow the pale 'Grit' road..."**** South Wales Coalfield Limestone to Stonehenge tonnage/date Estimates ~400 tons from South Wales Coalfield to Stonehenge Counterscarp in ~31st century BC ~300 tons from Stonehenge Counterscarp to Stonehenge Mound in ~27th century BC ~19 tons from Stonehenge Mound (Counterscarp) to Heelstone Ditch in ~21st century BC a) 1/4 of Counterscarp Limestone (~100 tons) still in place (see labeled "Counterscarp" in photo). b) 3/4 of Counterscarp Limestone cored remnants (~tstm) still in place under the rebuilt topsoil. c) 56 Coal Fire Pits (the 56 Aubrey Holes) of coated bottom cored remnants (~tstm) still in place. d) *Stonehenge Mound is 3/4 of relocated Counterscarp Limestone (~281 tons) (to left of "Drainage Trench"). e) **Heelstone Ditch bottom-half rammed fill (~19 tons) is Counterscarp Limestone from Stonehenge Mound. Identical fossils of the South Wales Coalfield's periphery limestone at Stonehenge 01) Aclisina 02) Aviculopecten 03) Bellerophon 04) Caninia cornucopiae 05) Chondrites 06) Cleiothyridina roissyi 07) Composita 08) Conocardium 09) Delepinea (Daviesiella) destinezi 10) Euphemites 11) Girvanella 12) Hapsiphyllum (Zaphrentis) konincki 13) Linoproductus 14) Megachonetes papilionaceous 15) Michelina grandis 16) Mourlonia 17) Murchisonia 18) Palaeosmilia 19) Plicochonetes 20) Rhipidomella michelini 21) Schellwienella cf. S. crenistria 22) Straparollus 23) Syringopora 24) Zoophycos South Wales Coalfield Grit/Coal to Stonehenge tonnage/date Estimates Stonehenge Mound Ditch ~113 m (~369 feet) circle circumference length ~21st century BC Stonehenge Mound Ditch ~42 m^3 (~1,476 cubic-feet) Grit/Coal volume ~21st century BC Stonehenge Mound Ditch ~58,967 kg (~130,000 pounds) Grit/Coal weight ~21st century BC a) Crosskeys Coal circling Stonehenge Mound is Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Westphalian coal. b) Millstone Grit circling Stonehenge Mound is Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Namurian sandstone. c) *Stonehenge Mound itself is Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) Arundian limestone and the artifacts. 3/4's of once full circled Counterscarp used as Claim Markers http://www.orionbeadling.net/CSCARPelev.jpg *Gold, Silver, Brass, Iron, Wood, Stone artifacts in Stonehenge Mound. **Gold, Iron, Wood, Stone artifacts under Heelstone wings carving. ***Discovered by Dr. Garry Denke, inventor of the core barrel. ****Grit was his horse's name, his pale hung from Grit's bridle. http://www.freewebs.com/garrydenke Iron (ferromagnetic) was first detected at Stonehenge Mound and under Heelstone wings by Denoco Inc.'s Schonstedt Model GA-22 Magnetic Locator in 1984, confirmed again by Denoco Inc.'s Schonstedt Model GA-52C Magnetic Locator in 1994, not by Ancient Monuments Laboratory in 1994 (unpublished). The claim markers*** for the gold, silver, brass, iron, wood, stone, artifacts, were discovered by Dr. Garry Denke using a coring tool, his core barrel invention of 1656. They are Carboniferous rocks, Upper and Lower: Stonehenge Whitestones, Gritstones, and Coalstones; in the quantities and locations listed above. Gold, Silver, Brass, Iron, Wood, Stone, Artifacts Anthropologists and archaeologists claim that Dr. Garry Denke discovered neither the ark of the covenant nor its 4 iron wheels at Stonehenge, such gold ark and iron wheels buried directly below Heelstone's flying eagle wings carving facing southwest (SW) at Stonehenge. Anthropologists and archaeologists also claim that he discovered neither Upper Carboniferous rocks nor Lower Carboniferous rocks at Stonehenge whose geological names and descriptions are shown below. His claim markers*** circling/over artifacts following*** The Seven (7) Rock Types at Stonehenge (3 'New'***) 1) Stonehenge White Chalk - The outcrop sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Cretaceous Period, Santonian Age, calcium carbonates. The Late Cretaceous Period outcrop sedimentary rocks comprise the first (1st) local in situ construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 85 million years old. These stones are called Seaford Chalk Formation rocks. 2) Stonehenge Whitestones*** - The oldest limestone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) Period, Arundian Age, calcium carbonates. The Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) Period limestone sedimentary rocks comprise the first (1st) foreign construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 340 million years old. These stones are called High Tor (Birnbeck) Limestone Formation rocks. 3) Stonehenge Bluestones - The volcanic rocks (oldest geologically) at Stonehenge are the Ordovician Period intrusive igneous diabases (dolerites), and extrusive igneous felsites (rhyolites) and tuffs (basic). The Ordovician Period igneous rocks comprise the second (2nd) foreign construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 470 million years old. These stones are called Ordovician Volcanic rocks. 4) Stonehenge Coshestons - The oldest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Silurian-Devonian Period micaceous sandstones. The Silurian-Devonian Period sandstone sedimentary rocks comprise the third (3rd) foreign construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 417 million years old. These stones are called Old Red Sandstone Formation rocks. 5) Stonehenge Sarsens - The youngest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Oligocene-Miocene (Tertiary) Period silicates. The Oligocene-Miocene Period sandstone sedimentary rocks comprise the fourth (4th) foreign construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 24 million years old. These stones are called Reading Formation rocks. 6) Stonehenge Gritstones*** - The sandstone grit, conglomerate, limestone, shale, and coal sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian), Namurian Age, silicates, calcium carbonates, and carbons. The Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period sandstone grit, conglomerate, limestone, shale, and coal sedimentary rocks comprise the fifth (5th) foreign construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 320 million years old. These stones are called Millstone Grit Formation rocks. 7) Stonehenge Coalstones*** - The bituminous coal sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period, Westphalian Age, carbons. The Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period bituminous coal sedimentary rocks comprise the sixth (6th) foreign construction material used by the Stonehenge builders. This material is approximately 310 million years old. These stones are called Crosskeys Coal Measures rocks. And finally anthroplogists and archaeologists claim that Dr. Garry Denke discovered neither the gold table of Moses nor the gold altar of Aaron located with the balance of remaining artifacts inside Stonehenge Mound, at 100 meters (109 yards, 328 feet) east-southeast (E-SE) of such Heelstone flying eagle wings carving facing southwest (SW) at Stonehenge. No one is sure why anthropologists and archaeologists make such claims with no evidence to back them up. Perhaps they will someday. "Until then... G'day."****
Garry Denke Posted May 30, 2004 Author Posted May 30, 2004 Sorry if I'm being ignorant, but what's that all about? Pseudoscience
Garry Denke Posted June 1, 2004 Author Posted June 1, 2004 Right... Here's three photos showing the Carboniferous White Limestone, Old Red Sandstone (Altar Stone), Carboniferous Black Coal and Carboniferous Pale Grit source area for these Stonehenge rocks. http://www.soton.ac.uk/~imw/jpg/South-Wales-map-1300.jpg http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/photos/GowerSWcoalfield.JPG http://www.xkeys.freeserve.co.uk/geology/coalfield.gif Here's an arial photo showing the ~100 tons of 1/4 Carboniferous White Limestone Counterscarp (foreground left). The other ~300 tons of 'missing' Carboniferous White Limestone Counterscarp was moved, piled, and is Stonehenge Mound (background left). Rammed in the ditch circling Carboniferous White Limestone Stonehenge Mound is the ~65 tons of Carboniferous Black Coal and Carboniferous Pale Grit from the South Wales Coalfield area. Old Red Sandstone (Altar Stone) is in the ~middle of Stonehenge. http://www.orionbeadling.net/CSCARPelev.jpg Here's a photo of the Carboniferous White Limestone Mound from the opposite direction, and a photo of the now-famous Lion head, Calf head, Man face (clockwise), and Eagle wings (centering) Heelstone Sculpture from the archway (its intended view). Rammed in the ditch circling the Tertiary Sandstone Heelstone is ~19 tons of Carboniferous White Limestone from the South Wales Coalfield area. Atkinson was right about this immediate backfilled ditch, unfortunately he failed to inspect the elder limestone fossils. http://homepages.enterprise.net/sisman/PHOTOs/StoneH1.jpg http://www.freewebs.com/garrydenke Here's a photo of Carboniferous Black (bituminous) Coal and a photo of Cretaceous White Chalk. The geologic outcrop at Stonehenge is Cretaceous White Chalk. If you can see the color difference between the rock in the first photo and the rock in the second photo, congratulations are in order. You are smarter than the Stonehenge 'experts' (see above). http://www.geol.umd.edu/~cbentley/virtual_samples/coal.JPG http://www.geol.umd.edu/~cbentley/virtual_samples/chalk.JPG Totaling ~465 tons of rocks, these ~400 tons of Carboniferous White Limestone, ~32.5 tons of Carboniferous Black Coal and ~32.5 tons of black Carboniferous Pale Grit hauled to Stonehenge, from South Wales Coalfield, in the Stone Age, are the equivalent of ~46.5 ten ton diesel truck loads full of rocks, the equivalent of ~465 one ton pickup trucks full of rocks, the equivalent of ~18,600 fifty pound animal skins full of rocks, or the equivalent of ~37,200 twenty-five pound clay pots full of rocks.
Garry Denke Posted June 4, 2004 Author Posted June 4, 2004 Do Not Fly on Ark Excavation Day! Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’) and Ezekiel’s 4 iron wheels are under Heelstone’s 2 flying eagle wings overhanging open ground. Heelstone’s lion head (top) is weathered-damaged, but its huge calf head (under right wing), wounded man face (under left wing), and 2 eagle wings (centering them), are still visible from the 7 stone archway. Rammed in the bottom-half of Heelstone’s 30m (100ft) circumference ditch is Carboniferous white stone (fossiliferous limestone) from South Wales. 3/4's of the ‘missing’ Counterscarp (Stonehenge’s outermost bank) is such Carboniferous white limestone, ~19 tons of it, the balance being Stonehenge Mound itself, ~281 tons. Located 100m (328ft) E-SE of Heelstone is such piled white limestone Stonehenge Mound resting on more artefacts over Cretaceous white chalk. The Mound and its artefacts are encircled by ~65 tons of Carboniferous black stone (fossiliferous coal) and Carboniferous pale grit (basically sandstone) from South Wales. Rammed in the bottom-half of its 113m (369ft) circumference ditch is such Carboniferous black coal and pale grit. Exodus’ gold table, gold altar, etc. (the balance of Exodus 37-40 ‘missing’ artefacts) are inside Stonehenge Mound. The white elders (older fossils) in such Carboniferous white limestone of 1/4 Counterscarp bank, 3/4 Stonehenge Mound - Heelstone Ditch bottom-half, differentiate these rocks from Stonehenge’s natural outcrop; Cretaceous white chalk, because it contains much younger fossils. Many of these fossils were originally quite large, easily identified before their fragmentation, caused by moving and crushing them. Stonehenge Heelstone Sculpture having 2 wings centering 4 beasts (described above), 24 white elders (identifying fossils) surrounding them in its ditch, and the 10000 x 10000 (1000s of 1000s) of white chalk fossils (younger identifiers), all located over/around Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’), total 6 wings (2 above GL, 4 below GL). Denoco Inc. (DI) 1984 geophysical surveys and English Heritage (EH) Ancient Monument Laboratory (AML) Archaeometry Branch (AB) 1994 geophysical surveys of Heelstone’s rectangular artefact anomaly show centering almost exactly plumb (directly below) the midpoint of Heelstone’s 2 wings overhanging such open ground. The rate of change of deviation from vertical of the Southwest (SW) leaning Heelstone since burial of Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’) below its 2 wings has been been calculated, and is 10cm (4in) per ~2000yrs. This is assuming that the artefact was centered perfectly plumb with the midpoint of Heelstone’s 2 wings at the time of burial. If it was, then this centering vertical plane alignment of the 2 wings above GL and 4 wings below GL would, from DI's 1984 and EHAMLAB’s 1994 geophysical surveys, make the calculation of 5cm (2in) per ~1000yrs for Heelstone movement valid. If it was not, then such rate of change of deviation from vertical would be invalid, unless the survey results are simply off center themselves. In any case, Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’) is not directly under Heelstone’s base, its 4 wings are under open ground directly below Heelstone’s overhanging 2 wings, offset by 10cm (4in). So the Heelstone does not have to be moved to retrieve Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’) rectangular artefact, whose long axis parallels the 4 Station Stones’ rectanglular long axis located SW of it, according to the 1984 and 1994 geophysical surveys. Watch the magnetic reversal (polar flip) on excavation day, at exhumation hour, of the Stonehenge Heelstone artefact. Remember to shut down your computer(s) on such day, magnetic reversals damage electronics, even surge protectors, and planes, automobiles, satellites, etc. Do Not Fly on Ark Excavation Day!
Garry Denke Posted June 5, 2004 Author Posted June 5, 2004 I really can't see the point to any of these posts. Sorry dave, here, Graviton's everywhere... E=(hc^5/G)^1/2 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = [(6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s) (2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)]^1/2 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] E=c^5/Gv 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/ (6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)(7.4008894 x 10^42 /s) 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] E=hc^3/Gm 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s) (2.6944002 x 10^25 m^3/s^3)/(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2) (5.4563026 x 10^-8 kg) 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] E=h(Gd)^1/2 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s) [(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)(8.2089591 x 10^95 kg/m^3)]^1/2 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] G=c^3/mv 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (2.6944002 x 10^25 m^3/s^3)/ (5.4563026 x 10^-8 kg)(7.4008894 x 10^42 /s) 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] G =wc^4/E 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (4.0507625 x 10^-35 m) (8.0776087 x 10^33 m^4/s^4)/(4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2) 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] G=c^4/F 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (8.0776087 x 10^33 m^4/s^4)/ (1.2106066 x 10^44 kg-m/s^2) 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] G=c^5/P 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/ (3.6293075 x 10^52 kg-m^2/s^3) 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 [rsu 3.9 x 10^-8] etc. (shortened to conserve bandwidth) http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/ (1998 values shown, working on 2002) Because it was recorded by the geophysical surveys, and it is known from literature, Exodus’ 114cm,45in x 69cm,27in x 69cm,27in four-winged gold ark (Rev's 'throne') and Ezekiel's four iron (ferromagnetic) wheels are currently located under the Stonehenge builders' rejected Heelstone, centered below the four beasts above it, surrounded by the 24 four elder(s) species of fossils (Carboniferous) around it, and the millions of species of younger fossils (Cretaceous) below it. Furthermore, 100m (328ft) east-southeast (E-SE) of Heelstone, at Stonehenge Mound, it was recorded by the geophysical surveys, and it is known from literature, Exodus' 229cm,90in x 229cm,90in x 137cm,54in brasen altar containing Exodus' 37-40 balance of artefacts (gold table, gold altar, etc.) are currently located inside Stonehenge Mound (Carboniferous), centered below its apex, surrounded by the ~32.5 tons of bituminous coal species of fossils (Carboniferous) around it, and the millions of species of younger fossils (Cretaceous) below it. It is true magnetic reversals are ongoing processes, however the quoted theory, one of many, is slightly flawed. All such theories will be tested by the EHAML-WANT (English Heritage, Ancient Monuments Laboratory - Wessex Archaeology, National Trust) 1) Gold Ark Experiment, to be conducted shortly. The EHAML-WANT 1) Gold Ark [with balance 1) brasen altar, 2) gold table, 3) gold altar] Experiment will trigger the next polar flip, such flip lasting less than 1hr,60min in time, beginning with decreasing candelas 36hr,2160min before exhumation, and ending with increasing candelas 36hr,2160min after exhumation, of EHAML-WANT 1) Gold Ark, throughout the universe of many. It is true this is a wildcat prospect http://www.freewebs.com/garrydenke but the exploration geophysics is completed and it is time to commence 'mining' operations. Garry W. Denke, Geologist/Geophysicist, Denoco Inc. of Texas, Wildcat Station, P.O. Box 866488, Plano, Texas 75086-6488 USA (972) 422-8268 Office, (972) 423-6337 Fax, (940) 521-1667 Mobile Graviton triggers the polar flip dave. Watch (time).
Garry Denke Posted June 24, 2004 Author Posted June 24, 2004 lol Garry Denke is back superforce = c^4/G c = superpower/superforce superpower = c^5/G http://perso.club-internet.fr/molaire1/e_superforce.html We were there gathered and hoping to show you all of the Carboniferous rocks, circling/over the artifacts. No worries though, all of the Welsh born Stonehenge rocks are to be moved back to Wales: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/3830547.stm Instead we visited the good Doctor Robyn Lewis who staked the official claim on behalf of all fellow druids, all bards and all the Welsh compatriots. Archdruid of Wales made no claim to our artifacts: http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20040614/stonehenge.html Discoveries sparked it. Glacial transport disproven. So much for the Judd, Kellaway, Hawkins, Williams-Thorpe, et al, glacial transport. Thomas, Atkinson, Greene, Scourse, et al, would be proud. http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/?view=usa&sf=toc&ci=0197261744 Here is the good Doctor's requested list of Welsh rocks that need to go back to Wales. They are in the way of the excavation of our gold, silver, brass, iron, wood, and stone artifacts anyway. Archdruid of Wales, the good Doctor Robyn Lewis, has offered to pay for their removal, as agreed, making this a low cost excavation: http://groups.msn.com/ArkArchaeology/shoebox.msnw 1) Stonehenge Whitestones - The oldest limestone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) Period, Arundian Age, calcium carbonates. The Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) Period limestone sedimentary rocks comprise the first (1st) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 340 million years old. These stones are called High Tor (Birnbeck) Limestone Formation rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales. 2) Stonehenge Bluestones - The volcanic rocks (oldest geologically) at Stonehenge are the Ordovician Period intrusive igneous diabases (dolerites), and extrusive igneous felsites (rhyolites) and tuffs (basic). The Ordovician Period igneous rocks comprise the second (2nd) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 470 million years old. These stones are called Ordovician Volcanic rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales. 3) Stonehenge Coshestons - The oldest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Silurian-Devonian Period micaceous sandstones. The Silurian-Devonian Period sandstone sedimentary rocks comprise the third (3rd) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 417 million years old. These stones are called Old Red Sandstone Formation rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales. 4) Stonehenge Gritstones - The sandstone grit, conglomerate, limestone, shale, and coal sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian), Namurian Age, silicates, calcium carbonates, and carbons. The Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period sandstone grit, conglomerate, limestone, shale, and coal sedimentary rocks comprise the fourth (4th) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 320 million years old. These stones are called Millstone Grit Formation rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales. 5) Stonehenge Coalstones - The bituminous coal sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period, Westphalian Age, carbons. The Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period bituminous coal sedimentary rocks comprise the fifth (5th) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 310 million years old. These stones are called Crosskeys Coal Measures rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales. Here Here to the good Doctor, the Archdruid of Wales! Garry Denke ps. See that fafalone, this redig is financed.
Dave Posted June 24, 2004 Posted June 24, 2004 And I still haven't the slightest clue as to what you're actually on about. So in retrospect, you probably posted to the right subforum.
Garry Denke Posted June 26, 2004 Author Posted June 26, 2004 And I still haven't the slightest clue as to what you're actually on about. So in retrospect, you probably posted to the right subforum. These rocks get to stay dave, so what is the big deal? 1) Stonehenge White Chalk - The outcrop sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Cretaceous Period, Santonian Age, calcium carbonates. The Late Cretaceous Period outcrop sedimentary rocks comprise the first (1st) English construction material used by the Stonehenge builders of England. This material is approximately 85 million years old. These stones are called Seaford Chalk Formation rocks. They are English and belong in England. 2) Stonehenge Sarsens - The youngest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Oligocene-Miocene (Tertiary) Period silicates. The Oligocene-Miocene Period sandstone sedimentary rocks comprise the second (2nd) English construction material used by the Stonehenge builders of England. This material is approximately 24 million years old. These stones are called Reading Formation rocks. They are English and belong in England. Unless of course Marlborough wants the Sarsens back; Save and Except: the Heelstone of Hampshire County. Stonehenge Heelstone Sculpture In 22 separate excavations, for which the detailed records are published, a total of "over 11,500 stone fragments were recorded" at Stonehenge (PROCEEDINGS AT THE BRITISH ACADEMY . 92, SCIENCE AND STONEHENGE, Cunliffe & Renfrew, 1997, pages 258-9), representing all of its different lithologies. Approximately 4,000 sarsen chips, including "a total of 3,760 sarsen fragments", and "sarsen sand from the area", excavated by Lieutenant-Colonel William Hawley (REPORT ON THE EXCAVATIONS AT STONEHENGE DURING THE SEASON OF 1923, W. Hawley, 1925, pages 21-50), from a single location within ten (10) meters of the Heelstone, in the Avenue between the Heelstone and the Slaughter Stone, "do strongly suggest that a stone was either dressed or broken up in the vicinity" (STONEHENGE, Cleal, Walker, Montague, 1995, page 290), in front of the Heelstone carvings. In 1975, Arizona State University (ASU) GLG 324 Petrology-Petrography class analised the Cainozoic Reading Formation sarsen samples provided by Professor Richard Atkinson from the London Basin, the Hampshire Basin, and from each of the sarsens at Stonehenge. The ASU 1975 GLG 324 Petrology-Petrography class determined through optical mineralogy and geochemical analysis that the source area of the Palaeogene-Oligocene age heavy mineralogy Heelstone was from the Hampshire Basin located to the south of Stonehenge, and all of the rest of the Neogene-Miocene age lighter mineralogy sarsens at Stonehenge were from the London Basin to the north of Stonehenge. It was from this first detailed analysis by ASU in 1975, and the subsequent works of H. Howard 1982; A petrological study of the rock specimens from excavations at Stonehenge, 1979-1980, in M.W. Pitts, 1982, 104-24, where the Heelstone carvings fragment chips from its sculpture were determined. In short, the piles of sarsen chips and sarsen sand at the sarsen Heelstone, "do strongly suggest that a stone was either dressed or broken up in the vicinity" (STONEHENGE, Cleal, Walker, Montague, 1995, page 290), in front of the Heelstone Lion head, Calf head, Man face (clockwise), and Eagle wings (centering) carvings: http://www.freewebs.com/garrydenke Bibliography: REPORT ON THE EXCAVATIONS AT STONEHENGE DURING THE SEASON OF 1923 William Hawley Antiq. J., 5 1925 21-50 Hele Stone, sarsen chips, and sarsen sand STONEHENGE R.J.C. Atkinson PENGUIN BOOKS in association with Hamish Hamilton 1956 ISBN 0140136460 INDEX 221 Carvings, prehistoric, 43-7, 91-3, 139-40, 178-9, 208-9 Heel Stone, 29-30,68-9, 70, 76, 105, 173, 203 STONEHENGE in its landscape; Twentieth-century excavations Rosamund M J Cleal, K E Walker, and R Montague with major contributions by Michael J Allen, Alex Bayliss, C Bronk Ramsey, Linda Coleman, Julie Gardiner, P A Harding, Rupert Housley, Andrew J Lawson, Gerry McCormac, Jacqueline I McKinley, Andrew Payne, Robert G Scaife, Dale Serjeantson, and Geoff Wainwright ENGLISH HERITAGE 1995 ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT 10 ISBN 1850746052 INDEX 603, 608 carvings, prehistoric 30-3, Plate 7.2 Heelstone (Stone 96), 25, 26, 166, 269, 270, 271, 272 PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY . 92 Science and Stonehenge Edited by BARRY CUNLIFFE & COLIN RENFREW Published for THE BRITISH ACADEMY by OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1997 ISBN 0197261744 INDEX 351, 355 carvings, prehistoric 5, 29, 35, 150, 338 Heelstone (Stone 96) 15, 16, 28, 155 HENGEWORLD Mike Pitts C CENTURY . LONDON 2000 ISBN 0712679545 INDEX 402, 403 Stonehenge carvings 8, 26, 265-6, 296-7, 27, 266 Heelstone 8, 96, 135, 139, 145-50, 154, 229, 266, 275, 7, 138, 146, 230
admiral_ju00 Posted June 27, 2004 Posted June 27, 2004 Stonehenge has never had my curiosity or at least not yet. So I'm with Dave here. What is all of this about or for(the purpose of you bringing this in)? It sounds/looks on a border of being paranormal and pseudoscience, and if so, why do you keep on adding these details as they amount to confusion and nothing more.
Dave Posted June 27, 2004 Posted June 27, 2004 Well quite; there's a load of citation about a certain type of rock appearing at stonehenge, but little (if none) about what the consequences of this are.
Garry Denke Posted June 27, 2004 Author Posted June 27, 2004 Stonehenge has never had my curiosity or at least not yet. So I'm with Dave here. What is all of this about or for(the purpose of you bringing this in)? It sounds/looks on a border of being paranormal and pseudoscience, and if so, why do you keep on adding these details as they amount to confusion and nothing more. http://www.sciforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2971&stc=1 Specifically define "this" in detail please.
admiral_ju00 Posted June 27, 2004 Posted June 27, 2004 http://www.sciforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2971&stc=1 It's always a pleasure to deal with an Intelligent human being*sarcasm heavily applied here*. w00t w00t.
Garry Denke Posted June 30, 2004 Author Posted June 30, 2004 It's always a pleasure to deal with an Intelligent human being*sarcasm heavily applied here*. w00t w00t. Many Thanks! Garry Denke
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now