The universe

[Peron]

The space between two objects in a vacuum, looks empty, it seems empty. Yet it cant be empty, because the objects would not exist.

Our atmosphere for instance seems empty yet it is not. Space looks empty but it cannot be empty.

Call it whatever you want, space-time, aether, etc. Something is their, and we know its their.

Since we can detect all sorts of fluctuations in space.

 

Now, we know that the space between two objects is 3D. That means whatever vacuum/space, is made of is 3D. It has volume, and it can transfer energy. Space is far more complex than we think.

 

So this is my explanation to what the universe is.

 

Here it is in its simple form. Imagine a ball of water, the water is what the space is made out of, and small specks of dust is the matter floating in the water.

Water can be a liquid and a solid. So, what I am saying is that matter is made of this space.

 

For instance if I take a round piece of bread and smash it on the ground.

People will conclude that the small pieces are what makes the bread this is true, but they will never say that the small pieces where made out of the dough.

 

So, this is the basis of my idea. I'm saying whatever space is, it is made out of something, and that something can turn into matter.

Big Bang solved.

[mooeypoo]

Moved to Pseudoscience and Speculations.

 

 

Peron, we've discussed the "matter of the universe" and the "particles that make the universe" in countless threads before. A hundred years ago the term used to describe this "matter" was "Ether".

 

Ether was proven to be irrelevant (undetectable, and with absolutely no effect on anything, which makes it indistinguishable from a conclusion that it's nonexistent).

 

Unless you have a way to provide new evidence as to your idea that space is "made of something", then your statement is moot. I'll call your "Something" vacuum and declare it has no effect on its surrounding, which unlike your idea, is actually supported by the evidence.

Mystery solved.

 

I think you should go over the rules and the Pseudoscience and Speculation policy thread again.

 

~moo

 

After further review, this is clear this thread is an attempt to reopen a previously closed thread about the same theory.

 

This thread is closed, with an encouragement to the poster to read the rules of the forum once again.

Edited May 18, 2009 by mooeypoo