Plasma computer.

[Peron]

Computer logic gates are on and off switches.

When it's on, the electric signal flows, when off no flow. Simple binary.

 

The Plasma computer works, by constructing a plasma arc. The arc bridges the two small electrodes, allowing the electric signal to flow.

 

The computer would be a cylinder, with billions of electrodes, the small cylinder would be filled will a gas, to allow arcing.

The arcs would be tiny, each would be nanometres across.

 

Plasma is a far better conductor than silica. Making the plasma computer, far faster than any computer on this planet.

Nikola Tesla, once made a inertia less plasma! The plasma was almost super fluid, it had no friction!

The computer would be super fast.

---

Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

The Particular bulb I talked about is describe in his book.

 

http://books.google.com/books?id=Y5bOI0YdWesC&dq=The+Inventions,+Researches+and+Writings+of+Nikola+Tesla&printsec=frontcover&source=bn&hl=en&ei=idINSrOaPKestAPk-MnnAg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4#PPP8,M1

 

When the brush assumes the form indicated in Fig. 16, it may be brought to a state of extreme sensitiveness to electrostatic and magnetic influence. The bulb hanging straight down from a wire, and all objects being remote from it, the approach of the observer at a few paces from the bulb will cause the brush to fly to the opposite side, and if he walks around the bulb it will always keep on the opposite side. It may begin to spin around the terminal long before it reaches that sensitive stage. When it begins to turn around principally, but also before, it is affected by a magnet and at a certain stage it is susceptible to magnetic influence to an astonishing degree. A small permanent magnet, with its poles at a distance of no more than two centimetres, will affect it visibly at a distance of two metres, slowing down or accelerating the rotation according to how it is held relatively to the brush. I think I have observed that at the stage when it is most sensitive to magnetic, it is not most sensitive to electrostatic, influence. My explanation is, that the electrostatic attraction between the brush and the glass of the bulb, which retards the rotation, grows much quicker than the magnetic influence when the intensity of the stream is increased.

 

When the bulb hangs with the globe L down, the rotation is always clockwise. In the southern hemisphere it would occur in the opposite direction and on the equator the brush should not turn at all. The rotation may be reversed by a magnet kept at some distance. The brush rotates best, seemingly, when it is at right angles to the lines of force of the earth. It very likely rotates, when at its maximum speed, in synchronism with the alternations, say 10,000 times a second. The rotation can be slowed down or accelerated by the approach or receding of the observer or any conducting body, but it cannot be reversed by putting the bulb in any position. When it is in the state of the highest sensitiveness and the potential or frequency be varied the sensitiveness is rapidly diminished. Changing either of these but little will generally stop the rotation. The sensitiveness is likewise affected by the variations of temperature. To attain great sensitiveness it is necessary to have the small sphere s in the centre of the globe L, as otherwise the electrostatic action of the glass of the globe will tend to stop the rotation. The sphere s should be small and of uniform thickness; any dissymmetry of course has the effect to diminish the sensitiveness.

 

The fact that the brush rotates in a definite direction in a permanent magnetic field seems to show that in alternating currents of very high frequency the positive and negative impulses are not equal, but that one always preponderates over the other.

 

Of course, this rotation in one direction may be due to the action of two elements of the same current upon each other, or to the action of the field produced by one of the elements upon the other, as in a series motor, without necessarily one impulse being stronger than the other. The fact that the brush turns, as far as I could observe, in any position, would speak for this view. In such case it would turn at any point of the earth's surface. But, on the other hand, it is then hard to explain why a permanent magnet should reverse the rotation, and one must assume the preponderance of impulses of one kind.

 

As to the causes of the formation of the brush or stream, I think it is due to the electrostatic action of the globe and the dissymmetry of the parts. If the small bulb s and the globe L were perfect concentric spheres, and the glass throughout of the same thickness and quality, I think the brush would not form, as the tendency to pass would be equal on all sides. That the formation of the stream is due to an irregularity is apparent from the fact that it has the tendency to remain in one position, and rotation occurs most generally only when it is brought out of this position by electrostatic or magnetic influence. When in an extremely sensitive state it rests in one position, most curious experiments may be performed with it. For instance, the experimenter may, try selecting a proper position, approach the hand at a certain considerable distance to the bulb, and he may cause the brush to pass off by merely stiffening the muscles of the arm. When it begins to rotate slowly, and the hands are held at a proper distance, it is impossible to make even the slightest motion without producing a visible effect upon the brush. A metal plate connected to the other terminal of the coil affects it at a great distance, slowing down the rotation often to one turn a second.

 

I am firmly convinced that such a brush, when we learn how to produce it properly, will prove a valuable aid in the investigation' of the nature of the forces acting in an electrostatic or magnetic field. If there is any motion which is measurable going on in the space, such a brush ought to reveal it. It is, so to speak, a beam of light, frictionless, devoid of inertia.

 

He was a genius. In the true scents. http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-02-03.htm#TRANSFORMER

---

Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

Hmm no one finds this fascinating. Oh well.

[John Cuthber]

"It is, so to speak, a beam of light, frictionless, devoid of inertia. "

The "so to speak" bit is important there, it means "not really".

Anyway, electrons are lighter than ions so, for a given voltage and size, electrons are quicker.

[Bignose]

Also, I'm just going to step up and say it: I think no one finds it fascinating because of the person posting it. Peron, you've shown in your other threads that you have very little interest in actually defending or discussing in any detail whatsoever any of posts you make -- your refusal to answer direct questions is what got your other threads locked -- so I think that so one is very interested in staring another discussion just to have to not actually answer any questions again.

 

That's just my personal opinion of why no one is responding to this thread or that other new one you started.

[UC]

Computer logic gates are on and off switches.

When it's on, the electric signal flows, when off no flow. Simple binary.

 

The Plasma computer works, by constructing a plasma arc. The arc bridges the two small electrodes, allowing the electric signal to flow.

 

The computer would be a cylinder, with billions of electrodes, the small cylinder would be filled will a gas, to allow arcing.

The arcs would be tiny, each would be nanometres across.

 

Plasma is a far better conductor than silica. Making the plasma computer, far faster than any computer on this planet.

 

You are completely missing the point of the silicon. First, let me ask you this: Even if the arc lets current flow, how do you control whether or not it flows? In computers, vast numbers of signals need to be coordinated or timed exactly in relation to one another. How would you manage all of this with this plasma comb?

 

As for the silicon, if conductivity were the goal, tiny silver wires would be used in the most expensive electronics instead, but they are not. Silicon, a semiconductor, has some odd properties and it is these properties that allow transistors to be built. Essentially, a small trigger voltage at the "base" allows current to flow through the transistor from the "collector" to the "emitter." A logic gate is more than just on or off. It's on under a special set or sets of conditions for it's 2 or more inputs and off for every other condition. Take a NAND gate, from which you can build any other gate you want with enough of them. The basic NAND has two inputs. When both are high, the output is low. In any other set of conditions (high, low; low, high; low, low) the output is high.

 

As you can see here, a NAND gate consists of two transistors and a resistor: http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~mssz/CompOrg/Figure1.16-NANDcircuit.gif

 

If you build a chip on a wafer of silicon, you can create millions of transistors, resistors, diodes, capacitors, etc. right on the surface and at extremely small scale (and enormously low cost).

---

Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

I would also like to point out that electricity doesn't move any slower though silicon than through copper or silver, but it does encounter a good deal more resistance.

[Peron]

You are completely missing the point of the silicon. First, let me ask you this: Even if the arc lets current flow, how do you control whether or not it flows? In computers, vast numbers of signals need to be coordinated or timed exactly in relation to one another. How would you manage all of this with this plasma comb?

 

I was thinking diamond circuit breakers.

 

 

As for the silicon, if conductivity were the goal, tiny silver wires would be used in the most expensive electronics instead, but they are not. Silicon, a semiconductor, has some odd properties and it is these properties that allow transistors to be built. Essentially, a small trigger voltage at the "base" allows current to flow through the transistor from the "collector" to the "emitter." A logic gate is more than just on or off. It's on under a special set or sets of conditions for it's 2 or more inputs and off for every other condition. Take a NAND gate, from which you can build any other gate you want with enough of them. The basic NAND has two inputs. When both are high, the output is low. In any other set of conditions (high, low; low, high; low, low) the output is high.

 

As you can see here, a NAND gate consists of two transistors and a resistor: http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~mssz/CompOrg/Figure1.16-NANDcircuit.gif

 

If you build a chip on a wafer of silicon, you can create millions of transistors, resistors, diodes, capacitors, etc. right on the surface and at extremely small scale (and enormously low cost).

---

Merged post follows:

Consecutive posts merged

I would also like to point out that electricity doesn't move any slower though silicon than through copper or silver, but it does encounter a good deal more resistance.

 

Hmm, so a plasma computer wouldn't work then?

 

What about a linear plasma computer, which uses the space between two carbon nano tubes to send electrons.