Grand Unified Theory

[jsaldea12]

GRAND UNIFIED THEORY

 

(For some thirty years, Eminent Scientist, Dr. Albert Einstein had tried to unify the four fundamental forces of the universe, namely: gravity, electro-magnetism, Strong nuclear force, and weak nuclear force. Dr. Stephen Hawking and many other prominent scientists have followed, went further to conceive version, “Theory of Everything”. But, so far, all attempts to unify the four fundamental forces have been unsuccessful.. The treatise below appears strongly, finally, to have the four forces unified into one... Please read particularly the second paragraph of revised article). This article has been posted in physforum, category – physics general.. since month of May, 2009. See sample posting of revision below. . jsaldea12)

 

 

Two common threads run through and link all matter in the universe. One is the immutable opposite law, which states “like repulse, unlike attract”, such as positive-negative, north pole -south pole, proton-electron, quark up-down, male-female, right-wrong, matter-anti-matter, electron- positron, name it, and always, there are two opposite sides. All matters, from largest to smallest, are wired to the opposite law, re- galaxies, stars, planets, atoms, proton, neutron, electron, quarks. Thus, by dissecting atom, the basic building block, the natures and behaviors of matter is revealed. Atom has nucleus, re- proton& neutron, and electron, and said nucleus is further dissected to consist of smaller fundamental particle, called quarks. Proton is positive and electron is negative, a concept in conformity with the law of opposite. Neutron, bedfellow of proton, on the other hand, decays to proton or to electron, called positron. Electron, on the other hand, mutate to positron., to neutron.. Even protons steal electron to make up lack of neutron in nucleus.. What do all these changing partners mean, these switching decays/mutations?.. But what is more revealing is that there are dwellers huddled inside the hollow nucleus, re-the smaller fundamental particles, called quarks, as unearthed by particle accelerators.. Quarks have three families, re- up-down, top-bottom, and charm-strange, (perhaps to hide their identity), the family features are actually positive (up, top, charm) and negative (down, bottom, strange), the positive and negative properties of the governing opposite law. In short, even in the very fundamental quarks, there is positive-negative property, not just positive-neutron nucleus as thought before. That shows just how incisively intrinsic is the opposite law that runs through in all atoms, and thereby, in all the make-ups of structures in the universe. It is the opposite law, re-unlike-attract property, that made up the attraction, re-positive to negative formations of primordial massing dusts, the alignment, binding, the eventual molding of galaxies, stars, planets, and all other suspended bodies in outer space.. (This may explain why there is dire lack of anti-matter in the universe now, because from the beginning, the unlike-attract property won over the like-repulse property)… It is stated that energy is never lost nor destroyed, it just changes form: whether in low temperature like the present conducive to life or in high temperature (100GeV up), as in Big Bang which altered the symmetries of particles (example: ice to water to gaseous), the opposite law is not lost or destroyed. The natures and behaviors of the opposite law is characterized as follows: cut and cut a bar magnet to slimmer and slimmer sizes and always, in each cut, there is positive and negative. .Bring and align the cut bars back together and always the reconstructed bar magnet is divided into versatile two equal: positive and negative. The opposite law has unwritten compulsion to divide into two equal opposite sides. The changing partners, the switching mutations/decays of neutrons, electrons, and protons mean the positive and negative in outer and inner shells seek equality and stability, just like water seeks its own level, with the equilibrium mass of nucleus separate from the equilibrium mass of electrons.. The opposite law is like one coin, with intrinsically two opposite sides, It appears further the direction or tilt determine whether it is positive or negative: directed/tilted toward one side, it becomes positive, directed the opposite side, it becomes negative. Thus, whether it is proton, neutron, quarks, electron, etc., each has intrinsic equal positive and negative properties. Positive and negative can even be reversed (earth).. Why is there this opposite law that works tirelessly and never sleeps? Don’t ask this author, but if you see two lovers of opposite sex who cannot help kissing each other, then know, without knowing why....

 

A common thread, a common bond runs through and unifies the four fundamental forces of the universe, namely, gravity, electro-magnetism, weak nuclear force and strong nuclear force. The law of conservation states that nothing is destroyed nor lost, things just change form, re-matter to energy, energy to matter: whether the temperature is low as conducive to life or temperature is high as (100GeV up) to breakup formation of atoms, the basic substance of the atoms is not lost nor destroyed, the four fundamental forces reappear, reassert their territories in each atom.. Atom is found out to be 99.999999999999% empty space! If atom were the size of 20 basketballs rolled into one, proportionately, the size of nucleus would be like a grain of sand inside, and if the nucleus were the size of 20 basketballs rolled into one, the size of a quark would be like a grain of sand. . That is how spacious is the atom, concept of atom as patterned after the solar system, only appears even more spacious. (what would happen to the established law of science if a more fundamental particle or simply pure energy is detected by a super-super accelerator, vibrating inside the hollow quarks?). The gravity of the nucleus is like the gravity experienced on surface of earth but is made strong, re-strong nuclear force, due to intense accumulation/ concentration of gravitational force in such extra-ordinary compact tiny area of the nucleus, thus, basically, strong nuclear force is one and the same substance with fundamental base gravity., It is like black hole, macro-strong nuclear force, in outer space, whose gravitational force is so concentrated in small area of compacted black hole but the strong concentrated gravitational force is the same gravity before the object became a black hole. In like manner, strong nuclear force is concentrated gravity in that extraordinary compact area of nucleus but it is the same gravity if it were not concentrated.. Here is a clinger: Proton does not decay, black hole, also, does not decay, implicating that both are uncannily the same.. Gravity and magnetism are fundamentally one: both are the making of the opposite law, with positive an negative property,. magnetism being natural concentrated gravity.. Such concentrated gravitational, magnetic nucleus exudes extension concentrated gravitational field which binds with the, could be, concentrated gravitational field of electrons in the spacious atom solar system. Electrons rotate and nucleus spin and concentrated electro-magnetism is generated/activated in the bonded micro-gravitational field, as well as electro-weak force is evoked in the nucleus, thus, fundamentally, electro-magnetism and electro-magnetic weak force are one and the same: both are the making of activated/evoked combination of gravity and magnetism, and inherent inactive electrical property. Thus, the four fundamental forces are symbiotically chained to one another inside the atom: gravity and strong nuclear force are one and same, and once activated/evoked, by motion, by rotation, creates, generates electro-magnetism, all four indispensably linked to one another inside the atom, all four unified as one, and altogether with the inseparable, the very fundamental particles themselves, the dwellers, as if pre-Set-up inside the atoms, re-protons, neutrons, electrons, quarks, ALL ARE UNIFIED AS ONE INSIDE THE ATOM... It is stated that the stated fundamental particles and fundamental forces were unified as one at time of Big Bang, and were separated then after. They may have been divorced temporarily by temperatures and through changing time, but all have never been separated permanently, all re-assert their existence, their pre-Set-up, in order, in unison, inside the atoms, in keeping with the law on conservation that nothing is lost nor destroyed.. Proton, for instance, does not decay, has life of a billion, trillion, trillion years!! that baffle many eminent physicists. It could be like its macro proton, black hole, whose strong nuclear force sucks escaping energy and light, perhaps,. there is a reason, a message why proton takes that long to decay... Though time changes, symmetries change, the elementary particles and fundamental forces return, retain their basic substance/form/energy and reassert their places, unified, inside all atoms, the building blocks of all structures in the universe.. In a nutshell, why do all stated fundamental particles and fundamental forces uncannily appear inside all atoms, as if pre-Arranged, pre-Designed, following and obeying an unmistakable, unfathomable Law?

 

 

Jose S. Aldea

Chairman – CSIS

*** Email Removed by Moderator ***

 

3rd Revised Philippine Copyrights 2009

By: jose s. aldea

 

With Philippine Copyrights 2009

 

posted 6.25.09

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Edited June 25, 2009 by mooeypoo

[timo]

HARMONIC GRAVITY VECTOR PHYSICS: THE SOLUTION TO ALL SEXUAL, FINANCIAL AND

SEXUAL PROBLEMS

 

 

ALL modern problems stem from the failure to recognise and live by time law.

Just as there are three dimensions, there are three entities in the Holy

Trinity. This is because of the LAW of ELECTRO-VOLUMETRIC EQUALITY. the cycle

of harmonic compensation is encoded in the decimal expansion of pi. Just as

there are five fingers on a human hand, there are five days in a working week.

This is because of Nature's law of atomic duality. the LAW of

ELECTRO-VOLUMETRIC EQUALITY is encoded in the Bible.

 

They altered the Bible to hide the COSMIC SECRET of Nature's law of atomic

duality.

 

the COSMIC ELECTRO-NATURAL CONSTANT is 3. only from this value can one derive

the MISSING MASS OF THE UNIVERSE.

 

Achieve untold riches today! Just follow these 5 easy steps.

1. Reject the IMMORAL and SINFUL doctrine of relativity.

2. Turn away from the international money power.

3. Reject the Satanic doctrine of evolution.

4. Make resonation theory your guide.

5. Reject the evil and IMMORAL doctrine of relativity.

IT'S THAT EASY!

 

----

[J.C.MacSwell]

I'm holding out for something even simpler.

 

That is all.

[mooeypoo]

Thread has been moved the Pseudoscience / Speculations forum. This is a speculative theory that has not (yet?) been accepted by mainstream science, and as such, this forum is the place for it.

 

jsaldea12, please read the Speculation Policy - you have a few steps to complete before we can consider your theory as valid.

 

Also, the email address in this post was removed, also in accordance to our rules.

~moo

[jsaldea12]

Do you agree that the four fundamental forces, re-gravity, electro-magnetism, strong nuclear force, and weak nuclear force, are all in each atom, UNIFIED AS ONE?

[mooeypoo]

Do you agree that the four fundamental forces, re-gravity, electro-magnetism, strong nuclear force, and weak nuclear force, are all in each atom, UNIFIED AS ONE?

No, they're not unified, they're individual forces.

 

Plus.. what is "re-gravity"?

[jsaldea12]

All the four forces are unified and linked inseparably to one another inside the atom. As explained in the article, strong nuclear force is nothing but gravity. Like strong gravitation force of black hole which is concentrated, compact that prevents even light from escaping, but before it became black hole, it was ordinary gravity. see? In like manner, strong nuclear force inside the nucleus is nothing but gravity if it were not concentrated, compact. Gravity’s arms, re-the extended locked gravitational fields of spinning nucleus and hi-speed orbiting electrons, generate electro-magnetism and weak electric force. Thus, how all forces are linked, unified .inside each atom.

 

 

Jsaldea `12

 

6.29.09.

[insane_alien]

jsaldea, explain why the strong force does not follow an inverse square law with distance then?

 

it actually gets stronger with distance rather than weaker and eventually there is a boundary to its extent from gluon selfinterference. this is not how gravity works on any scale.

 

evidence or STFU.

 

and stop posting your crap on my user page.

[jsaldea12]

I never mention gravitational force does not follow inverse law. You are making double talk!! You said “It gets stronger with distance, rather than weaker” are you referring to gravitational force getting stronger with distance? In the same breath, you end up, “This is not how gravity works on any scale”. Now you correct yourself.

 

Do you agree or disagree that the strong nuclear force in nucleus of atom is the same strong gravitational force of black hole? Do you know that proton does not decay, uncannily, in like manner, black hole does not decay…black hole sucks even energy and light that try to escape. This could also be the reason why proton does not decay (life of proton is some billion, trillion, trillion years) because of compact strong gravitational attraction of the proton that its suck is stronger than the most powerful accelerator strive to make proton decay.

 

 

Jsaldea12

 

6.29.09.

[insane_alien]

I never mention gravitational force does not follow inverse law. You are making double talk!! You said “It gets stronger with distance, rather than weaker” are you referring to gravitational force getting stronger with distance? In the same breath, you end up, “This is not how gravity works on any scale”. Now you correct yourself.

 

i said the strong force get stonger with distance not gravity. read my previous post more carefully.

 

Do you agree or disagree that the strong nuclear force in nucleus of atom is the same strong gravitational force of black hole?

 

i disagree completely. gravity and the strongforce behave very very differently and have been observed to use different methods of action.

 

Do you know that proton does not decay, uncannily, in like manner, black hole does not decay…black hole sucks even energy and light that try to escape.

 

i don't know what protons not decaying has to do with this, but i'll run with it.

 

neutrons decay and they are held together by the stronf force, mesons decay and are also held together by the strong force, there are a bunch of other particles that decay which are held together by the strong force.

 

blackholes also decay via hawking radiation, this will likely be observed in detail when the LHC comes online.

 

This could also be the reason why proton does not decay (life of proton is some billion, trillion, trillion years) because of compact strong gravitational attraction of the proton that its suck is stronger than the most powerful accelerator strive to make proton decay.

 

gravity is actually pretty piss poor as forces go. very feeble indeed. the strong force is some 10^40 times stronger. it is also distance limited while gravity is not.

 

 

also, you say the proton doesn't decay and yet in the same breath contradict yourself by saying it has a finite lifetime, if they did not decay then why would they have a finite life?

[jsaldea12]

H! Genius, you are not insane. Just brilliant. In answer to your recent reply, please permit me to refer you to latest post in Physics, entitled, "Equilibrium of positive to negative of atom. I have to post it there because I feel it is real. My concept of positive and negative of atom differ with long-tradition generally accepted concept. That, whatever is that that is involved in nucleus of atom is simply positive and negative equilibrum. the making of unerring law of opposite, right inside the nucleus shell, and separate from the equilibrium of electrons's shell.

 

That recent post would interest the vast armory of your mind.

 

Regards.

 

 

jsaldea12

 

6.30.09

[mooeypoo]

I have to post it there because I feel it is real.

 

FEELING has nothing to do with it. You have supplied no math or any sort of *valid* evidence to your theories, hence it is NOT mainstream, and does NOT belong on the mainstream forum.

 

Do not post it there, it will be against the rules. It will be moved, and likely result in some moderation action.

 

Keep your discussion where it belongs: Right here.

 

I recommend you concentrate on providing some valid evidence to your CURRENT claims in your CURRENT threads that are, currently, quite lacking, before you go on to post yet another incoheret unsupported bunch of googligook wordsalad.

 

~moo

[jsaldea12]

The atom is patterned after our solar system.. with the sun as nucleus and planets as satellites. So are galaxies, the black hole as nucleus and stars as satellites. Such is the pattern of the creation (pre-Designed) of our universe. (what evidence is there to show than that?) So is in macro, so in micro, is the guiding rule: in micro-solar system of the atom, there is the nucleus and satellites, the electrons. In the nucleus of atom proton is found out that it does not decay. In like manner, in macro-solar system, the galaxies black holes do not also decay, uncannily similar to the non-decaying proton. These are observations of reputable scientists, thus, it is their competent words, I am just repeating. Now, if the gravitational force of black hole is so strong and concentrated that it even prevents energy and light from escaping, the same patterned is also happening in the micro-solar system of atom. As evidence by the incredible explosion of the nucleus, the nucleus, most specifically, the proton must be so concentrated, compact, that its gravitational force is so strong, just like black hole. Thus, if strong gravitational force of blackhole was formerly ordinary gravity until it is concentrated, in like manner, by pre-Designed, the proton is compact, concentrated gravity made strong. But if it were not compact, it was just simple gravity. What evidence, computations can I give? All these observations are made by reputable scientists, re-black hole not decaying and proton not decaying, like Dr. Michael Turner, Ph. D. I just assemble, assimilate them together. Hope you can see now. Regards.

 

 

Jsaldea12

 

67.1.09

[mooeypoo]

Again? Really?

 

Seriously, do you REALLY think that repeating crap will make the crap less crappy?

 

Stop repeating your statements, we've shown you that they're wrong. Repeating wrong statements will not make them right, it will just make you someone who repeatedly states wrong statements.

[jsaldea12]

I have to repeat and repeat because you cannot understand. How can that be? Please free your mind from old notion, open your mind. No disrespect.

 

 

jsaldea12

 

 

7.1.09

[mooeypoo]

We understand, you can't answer our questions, or acknowledge the fact that we show your statements to be false.

[insane_alien]

our minds are open, the theory we have found to be correct is a lot more wacky than yours and it works. it allows us to predict how atoms behave, yours does not.

 

and electrons do not orbit atominc nuclei anything like planets in the solar system.

[Klaynos]

To be taken seriously in science, if you are claiming something to be true what you need is mathematical predictions that either:

 

Match the experimental evidence as well as current theories but the assumptions made are more fundemental

 

or

 

Has the same level of assumptions but matches the experimental data better.

 

None of your ideas make mathematical predictions and therefore do not match ANY experimental data as good as current theories.

[Bignose]

I have to repeat and repeat because you cannot understand. How can that be? Please free your mind from old notion, open your mind. No disrespect.

 

 

jsaldea12

 

 

7.1.09

 

Why is your repeat and repeat better than the other members' repeat and repeat?!? Why don't you take your own advice here and open your mind and actually critically evaluate evidence as to which idea is better?

[jsaldea12]

What I have been telling you are facts, the atom, the nucleus, the electrons, etc. and that why they are unified inside in all atoms. Yet, you refuse to know. Regards.

 

 

jsaldea12

 

7.1.09

[insane_alien]

you have been refusing to provide evidence.

[Sisyphus]

What I have been telling you are facts, the atom, the nucleus, the electrons, etc. and that why they are unified inside in all atoms. Yet, you refuse to know. Regards.

 

 

jsaldea12

 

7.1.09

 

When people disagree about facts, repeating yourself over and over is not helpful. You have to provide evidence, and use logical arguments. You say everyone is "refusing to know," but you are saying one thing (without evidence), and everyone else is saying something else (with evidence). You seem to think what you're saying is obviously true, and doesn't need explaining. It isn't. In fact, to most of us, it seems obviously not true. If we're all "refusing to know," then explain why we are and you aren't. (And "because what I'm saying is true" is not a valid answer.)

[bombus]

I don't expect anyone to provide proof of anything in speculations and psuedoscience - it is the only place in the forum where one can float 'crazy' ideas, HOWEVER, I think the issue here is that a GRAND UNIFIED THEORY needs to define how all the fundamental forces can be explained in terms of a single field. Just saying all are unified in the atom does not help because, Yes, of course they are unified in the atom and everywhere else in the universe, but HOW is the question. If you can answer that (preferably in mathematics) then you will be genius.

 

Apologies if I have misunderstood you.

[insane_alien]

the whole point o f speculation is to come up with an idea and explore the implications of that idea and do preliminary testing(internal consistency, rough scrutinization against preexisting data etc.)

 

if its good we get a hypothesis and further exploration and testing can begin, if not it is discarded.

[Bignose]

What I have been telling you are facts, the atom, the nucleus, the electrons, etc. and that why they are unified inside in all atoms. Yet, you refuse to know. Regards.

 

I can play this game, too:

 

All you have been told are facts, yet you refuse to know. Regards.

 

 

-----------

 

Dang... if only there was a way to solve this impasse.... Hmmmm, what if... no... no wait ..... wait.... wait... what if each side brought some pieces of evidence to the table and we all decided which tasted better... no, wait, not tasted better, how about which evidence smelled better. Yep. Smelled. ... ... No, wait, I have an even better idea! Maybe let's use the evidence to decide which hypothesis is fit better. Yes, that's it. Let's all bring all the available evidence together and see which model it fits better.

 

-----------

 

If that doesn't fire up the ol' neurons, here's another example. What you are doing right now is analogous to giving testimony in a courtroom. You are trying to convince a jury that what you believe you saw is the truth. A good witness answers every question asked by the lawyers as accurately as possible. You are answering every question with "Mr. Smith did it."

 

Lawyer: "What was the weather like that day?"

You: "Mr. Smith did it."

Lawyer: "How far away were you when you first saw Mr. Smith?"

You: "Mr. Smith did it."

Lawyer: "Had you ever met Mr. Smith before that day?"

You: "Mr. Smith did it."

Lawyer: "What clothes was the assailant wearing that day?"

You: "Mr. Smith did it."

Lawyer: "What time was it?"

You: "Mr. Smith did it."

Lawyer: "What street were you on?"

You: "Mr. Smith did it."

 

Do you see how such a witness would probably be completely dismissed by jurors? A good witness answers the questions asked, and doesn't just repeat over and over and over. That's all we're asking of you, to answer all the various questions. Repeating over and over and over and over is worthless and completely unconvincing. Convince us by being a good witness.