Why gravity is all attraction toward earth?

[jsaldea12]

WHY IS GRAVITY ALL ATTRACTION TOWARD EARTH?

 

(Ever since that momentous time Adam’s apple fell on the lap of napping Newton, “simpleton” gravity has become intriguing, more intriguing, that up to now, gravity is ranked one of the eleven greatest (if not the greatest) unanswered questions in physics, according to Dr. Michael Turner, Ph. D. and many other physicists. Yes, why does the apple falls downward toward the center of Earth and not up to outer space? The following almost four decades of sleuthing finally dissects, like surgical knife, and unlocks the true nature and behavior of gravity).

 

Two phenomena, working together as one, are responsible “why gravity is all attraction toward earth?”, namely: (a)The attraction gravity of Newton, and the “no-force” space-time gravity of Dr. Einstein The attraction gravity of Newton is the making of the unerring Opposite Law, re-like repulse, UNLIKE ATTRACT, and is manifested in all matters in the universe. All matters, from largest to smallest, have opposite properties, re-positive and negative; north pole and south pole; protons and electrons , male and female, name it, and there are always two opposites. The space-time gravity of Dr. Einstein is the skein or fabric of just the whole outer space, and such spacetime is simply making itself felt by effortlessly weighing, pressing all over such suspended ball, called, earth, and other suspended bodies in the universe.

It appears strongly that both the attraction gravity of Newton and spacetime gravity of Einstein work together, inseparably, as one, like two sides of a coin. There is not one slice of the spacetime wherein there is no attraction gravity, and neither is there one iota of attraction gravity, (re- particularly the extension gravitational field of earth), not completely enveloped by spacetime.

 

How was earth and gravity on earth created? It appears that from the beginning, re-the primordial emanation of dust, clouds of dust in outer space, the inherent Law of Opposite operated, re-the UNLIKE ATTRACT property wiggled, re-positive to negative, aligning, and bonding the emanated mass of dust which had inherent positive and negative property, such “unlike attract” property winning over the “like repulse” property. This is the attraction gravity of Newton.. The attraction, alignment and bonding were from all directions toward the center of the gathering mass, contracting, heating, and condensing, until a circular lump was shaped and solidified, called earth, formed some forgotten five billion years ago. Earth was shaped like a ball, just like other suspended bodies in outer space, because the tendency of suspended matter to solidify in outer space is circular. Because earth is ball-shaped, slightly spherical, the strongest attraction gravity of Newton, re- unlike-attract alignment, is a straight line from one surface through the center of earth to the opposite surface, thus any surface of earth has strongest attraction gravity of Newton all downward bound toward the center of earth. But before, during, and after such Law of Opposite operated, space was there already existing, the space-time of Dr. Einstein whose matrix was curved as it caught earth in the making.. The ever presence of space-time, the whole outer space, has skein/matrix which weighs involuntarily, all over suspended bodies, like earth.. The effect is like this: at bottom of ocean , 2-kilometer deep, lives unearthly-looking fishes, unaware of the pressure of the deep ocean; at the bottom of earth’s atmosphere is home to human beings who cannot feel the several kilometers altitude atmosphere; in like manner, over all suspended earth and other suspended bodies in space, is simply the whole wide outer space, the space-time of Dr. Einstein, hanging with nothing to hang, freely weighing all over earth, the direction of the effortless weight was all toward the center .of earth. Thus, the over-all combined effect of Newton attraction gravity and spacetime gravity of Dr. Einstein is what is experienced on surface of earth , called “gravity”, all such combined gravity pulling and pressing evenly, toward the interior center of earth .

 

Some notes about the similarity of behaviors between Newton gravity and magnetism. Newton’s gravity , the weakest of the four fundamental forces of nature, is trillion times weaker than a magnet, but attraction gravity and magnetism have fundamentally the same positive and negative property of the unerring Law of Opposite.. By observing a magnet, the behavior of attraction gravity of Newton is unveiled: Cut, for instance, a bar magnet into half and cut further into smaller cuts, and each cut bar has positive and negative. Throw the cut magnet bars together and each cut bar will SEEK the opposite, re-positive attracts, aligns the negative, negative to positive. Arrange the cut-bars, one after another, the positive to negative to positive to negative to form one aligned cut bars, and always one end of the arranged aligned cut-bars is positive and opposite end is negative, and the aligned cut-bars is divided at the middle equally into positive and negative! Such, too, are the versatile behaviors of attraction gravity, with same inherent built-in intersecting positive and negative property of matter, the making of the governing Opposite Law of the universe..

 

 

When billions of tons of sea water on earth is being raised whenever the moon is overhead, this is the making of the attraction gravity of Newton, re-the gravitational fields of both moon and the earth locks, re-the positive-negative property of the moon, attracted, aligned and locked with the negative-positive property, respectively, of earth, (it also means that in that lock, there is electro-magnetism created that binds the two gravitational fields), but without the space-time gravity of Dr. Einstein, its unbreakable fabric, acting like super string, on which Newton’s attraction gravity tugs the earth and moon, there would have been no raising of sea water on earth, neither would the honeymoon between moon and earth last for long. When debates had prolonged whether the expansion of the universe can be halted and be pulled back to “big Crunch”, the concept is the attraction gravity of |Newton, the gravitational FORCE to hold and pull back the galaxies, but it is the unbreakable skein of space-time of Dr. Einstein that is being stretched and pulled. When light cannot escape in black hole because the infinitely contracted gravitational FORCE is so strong, the attraction gravity of Newton is referred, but it is the unbreakable spacetime of Einstein that catches and holds, like a bottomless hole-in-one trampoline, the super-heavyweight pint-size blackhole. Do the gravitational fields of earth and moon have electro-magnetic property? The attraction binding of gravitational fields of moon and earth implicates the existence of electro-magnetism, for only such electro-magnetic property can PULL and TUG the gravitational field earth and make ocean raised. In other words, the positive and negative property of moon binds the negative and positive property, respectively, of earth. It further implies that the universal gravitational fields created by the galaxies have electro-magnetic property too. What can invoke/generate electro-magnetism? Motion, the hi-speed orbit and rotation of earth and the super-super speed rotation (2 million miles per/hr., more or less) of galaxies generate electro-magnetism on the local and universal gravitational fields, which is intrinsic on the skein of space-time. Rotation makes generator create electro-magnetism. The presence of Van Allen Belt around earth, the millions of lightning that strike on earth almost daily, are evidences of the electro-magnetic property of rotating earth, a magnet, itself, with north and south poles. Further implication, electro-magnetic light has now a n electro-magnetic medium: electro-magnetic pure light waves, emanating from distant galaxy, travels, propagates on equally electro-magnetic universal and local gravitational fields, to contact electro-magnetic human eyes and brain, as preserved, intact, whole, with all colors, sounds and movements (just like receptions in radios and TVs).

..Here is further proof: why locked gravitational fields of earth and moon generate electro-magnetism, and why there exists locked gravitational fields between electron and nucleus of atom. As in macro so in micro: In micro-solar system of atom, electro-magnetism is generated by orbiting electrons around spinning nucleus, such electro-magnetism generated implies the existence of locked gravitational fields in the spacious micro-atom solar system which is 99.999999999999% space. In like manner, in macro-solar system, electro-magnetism, on gravitational level, is generated on the locked gravitational fields of earth orbiting around the spinning sun. Will electro-magnetic light from a distant star bend when passing by an equally electro- gravitational field of the sun? Yes. electro-magnetic light has mass, can be bent by electro-magnetic gravitational field of the sun, bent together with the spacetime curvature of Dr. Einstein. Here is the nail to the coffin: electromagnetic light is not only bent, but even can be sucked back by the same but strong electro-gravitational field of the black hole...

 

Why does a man falls down to Earth, like the famous “apple”, and not flies up to outer space? The immense joint gravity of Newton and Dr Einstein complement one another and work, as follows: The whole wide spacetime of Dr. Einstein freely crowding, flexing its weight on itself, involuntarily pushes its size all over earth while the gravity attraction of Newton pulls man (who has positive and negative, himself) downward, thus, both gravities work as one over earth and makes minuscular man all downward toward the center of earth. Thus, the familiar, off-repeated saying, “Gravity is all attraction toward Earth!”. Without both gravity of Newton and Dr. Einstein, no planet, nor star, nor galaxy would have solidified in the universe, neither would there have been existing living beings on Earth.

 

It appears the mystery that cloaks, for several centuries, simpleton gravity is finally torn and gravity, with all its glory, is at last laid naked....

 

 

Jose S. Aldea

Chairman - Capiz Scientists & Inventors Society – Philippines

e-mail: *** EMAIL REMOVED (AGAIN!) BY MODERATOR ***

 

Cc: Dr. Estrella F. Alabastro, Ph. D. – Hon. Secretary – DOST (efa@dos.gov.ph)

Dr. Graciano P. Yumul, Jr. - Hon. Undersecretary – DOST (gpyumul@dost.gov.ph)

Mr. Roy Donato – President, Capiz Scientists & Inventors Society (donato_roya@yahoo.com)

 

 

3rd. revised Philippine Copyright 2009

By: Jose S. Aldea

With Philippine Copyrights 2004, 2007, 2008

posted sfn 6. 26.09

Edited June 26, 2009 by mooeypoo

[mooeypoo]

You are testing our patience. Read the rules, or don't bother posting here.

[Mokele]

WHY IS GRAVITY ALL ATTRACTION TOWARD EARTH?

 

It's not. The fact that you even think that undermines any level of credibility you might have had.

[Daecon]

It's only a theory.

[mooeypoo]

No, no, no it's not.

[GutZ]

http://www.google.ca/search?q=jsaldea12

 

Don't even bother with him... He does this everywhere.

 

Should save you on warnings if you can see evidence of copy and pasting, everywhere....

 

It probably only work with unique names though.

Edited June 26, 2009 by GutZ

[Fuzzwood]

1 word: sun

 

[swansont]

Two phenomena, working together as one, are responsible “why gravity is all attraction toward earth?”, namely: (a)The attraction gravity of Newton, and the “no-force” space-time gravity of Dr. Einstein

 

It's not a combination of the two, since they attempt to describe the same thing. But the underlying idea you present is "the explanation of gravity is Newton and Einstein."

 

Wow. Thanks for the tip.

[jsaldea12]

When the moon raises millions of tons of salty sea water on earth, that is electro-magnetic attraction, binding of gravitational fields of moon and earth. Thus, ATTRACTION, re- Newton attraction gravity, is real.

 

 

 

Jsaldea12

 

6.27.09

[insane_alien]

it is nothing to do with elctromagnetic attraction. it is graviational. the two are not equivalent.

[swansont]

When the moon raises millions of tons of salty sea water on earth, that is electro-magnetic attraction, binding of gravitational fields of moon and earth. Thus, ATTRACTION, re- Newton attraction gravity, is real.

 

 

 

Jsaldea12

 

6.27.09

 

What is your fundamental thesis - that it's real? Thanks, we already know.

 

That it's electromagnetic? No, it's not. The tides affect all the water, and more, not just one of the charges of ionic material dissolved in it. The solid earth feels tides, too.

[stereologist]

A good example of tidal forces acting on solids is seen on the moon Io. The result is a heated moon and volcanic activity.

 

From http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/ast04oct99_1.htm

 

The intense volcanism on Io results from 100 meter high tides raised in its otherwise solid surface by nearby Jupiter and the other Galilean satellites.

[Daecon]

No, no, no it's not.

Poe's law? I should have added a smiley at the end.

[the tree]

When the moon raises millions of tons of salty sea water on earth, that is electro-magnetic attraction,

What made you think that? Water is very clearly not magnetic - you can test that with a cheap magnet and a bowl of water.

 

binding of gravitational fields of moon and earth.

Gravity and magnetism - not the same thing at all.

 

Thus, ATTRACTION, re- Newton attraction gravity, is real.

So your point is now, that gravity is a real thing? Is that not a little bit of a trivial statement?

[jsaldea12]

Salty water is conductor of electro-magnetism, that is why liquid salty ocean is raised more than solid matter. This proves that the locked gravitational field of earth and moon has electro-magnetic property. .generated by orbit of moon around earth and rotation of earth. Motion generates electro-magnetism, like in generator..

 

Gravity and magnetism fundamentally have something in common: both are the making of the opposite law which states, like repulse, unlike attracts.

 

Attraction gravity of Newton is real. What is that that raises millions of tons of sea water on earth…that is attraction, re-the positive and negative property of earth is attracted/bind with the negative and positive property, respectively, of moon. That raising is not the no-force spacetime gravity of Dr. Einstein, although such attraction gravity utilizes, rides on the spacetime gravity to bind and lock both gravitational fields.

 

Regards.

 

 

Jsaldea12

 

6.29.09

[insane_alien]

there is no significant electromagnetic field to cause the tides though. we're quite good at detecting those you know, and there just isn't one there.

 

it is gravity that cause the tides and it is a non-electromagnetic force.

 

face it, your wrong. while you may be able to convince the occasional layman, convincing people who actually know a fair bit about this stuff requires a whole heap of evidence and you know, proof.

[swansont]

Salty water is conductor of electro-magnetism, that is why liquid salty ocean is raised more than solid matter. This proves that the locked gravitational field of earth and moon has electro-magnetic property. .generated by orbit of moon around earth and rotation of earth. Motion generates electro-magnetism, like in generator..

 

The oceans are raised more because they are more fluid than the solid earth. Fresh water is affected by tides, too. We just don't see it because of the scale — you need a large separation between points, and lakes just aren't big enough to have a noticeable effect.

 

If the interaction were magnetic, there would be no energy issue at all. We'd have generators in our homes and cars. Everything would run off of them. Fossil fuels would never have been developed. Build one and run it to tap into this energy, and then we'll believe you. It should be easy if you're right.

[D H]

Salty water is conductor of electro-magnetism, that is why liquid salty ocean is raised more than solid matter. This proves that the locked gravitational field of earth and moon has electro-magnetic property.

The conclusion does not follow from the premise and the premise itself is flawed.

 

To prove the premise and the conclusion correct you would have to show

• That the Moon has a significant electromagnetic field (it has an extremely weak electromagnetic field);
  
• That the electromagnetic fields of the Moon and the Sun are proportional to the mass of each (they are not);
  
• That this field interacts with the oceans, fresh water, and the earth itself in the manner observed (it doesn't); and
  
• That gravity alone cannot explain the ocean tides and Earth tides (it does).

[jsaldea12]

Salty water is good conductor of electro-magnetism than fresh water. We cannot feel how sea water is raised, but in gargantuan scale like the earth and the moon, both bodies feel it! the raising of tide…though gravity is trillion times weaker than magnetism.

 

Thus, though the moon gravitational field is weak, it is strong enough to raise ocean on earth..

 

Gravity (attraction gravity?) alone cannot explain the ocean tide? What other phenomenon can raise ocean on earth, which we know only happens when the moon is overhead. It cannot be the spacetime of Dr. Einstein. Now it is concrete and clear what is this ATTRACTION is all about. It is the action of the law of opposite which states UNLIKE ATTRACT. A lengthy explanation is embodied in the article, and reasons why gravity of Newton is all attraction toward earth.

 

 

Jsaldea12

 

 

6.30.09.

 

..

[mooeypoo]

Salty water is good conductor of electro-magnetism than fresh water.

No, water is a very poor conductor. It's the *salt* ions that conduct electricity, which is why salty water conduct better than fresh water.

 

We cannot feel how sea water is raised, but in gargantuan scale like the earth and the moon, both bodies feel it! the raising of tide…though gravity is trillion times weaker than magnetism.

Of course we can feel it, we see the tides. If you mean the human body can't feel it, you can't really feel electromagnetism either unless it's huge - same with gravity. You feel gravity towards Earth, because you're close enough to its surface for it to be larger than other forces of gravity from other planets/celestial objects.

 

 

Thus, though the moon gravitational field is weak, it is strong enough to raise ocean on earth..

 

Gravity (attraction gravity?) alone cannot explain the ocean tide? What other phenomenon can raise ocean on earth, which we know only happens when the moon is overhead. It cannot be the spacetime of Dr. Einstein. Now it is concrete and clear what is this ATTRACTION is all about. It is the action of the law of opposite which states UNLIKE ATTRACT. A lengthy explanation is embodied in the article, and reasons why gravity of Newton is all attraction toward earth.

Gravity is attractive force. There's no such thing as "Attraction Gravity", it's a repetition.

 

Not only *can* these be explained by Einstein's theories, they *are* explained with Einstein's theories, and are supported by math that *predicts* occurrences.

 

If you have a better idea about how things work, you really should start supplying actual math to support it; your claims are comparative ("stronger"/"weaker"/etc) and thus will be proven with math quite clearly.

 

I'm waiting for the math and its predictive capabilities. Can you show your math to be better than the current mathematical concept that supports and predicts the CURRENT theory?

 

If so, show it.

[D H]

Salty water is good conductor of electro-magnetism than fresh water. We cannot feel how sea water is raised, but in gargantuan scale like the earth and the moon, both bodies feel it! the raising of tide…though gravity is trillion times weaker than magnetism.

 

Thus, though the moon gravitational field is weak, it is strong enough to raise ocean on earth..

Just because you say something does not make it true.

 

You need to show with math that the Moon's incredibly weak and more-or-less random magnetic field can raise tides as you claim. You have to show how the Sun's magnetic field, even though it is much stronger and better organized than the Moon's magnetic fields, only raises half the tides that the Moon does.

 

 

Gravity (attraction gravity?) alone cannot explain the ocean tide? What other phenomenon can raise ocean on earth, which we know only happens when the moon is overhead. It cannot be the spacetime of Dr. Einstein.

Once again, just because you say something does not make it true.

 

You need to show with math that the work of Euler, Laplace, Kelvin, Darwin, AEH Love, and others that explain tides solely through Newtonian gravity is somehow wrong. The Newtonian results explain very well why the solar tides are about half the height of lunar tides and give extremely accurate predictions of both the solar and lunar tides.

 

You need to show with math that general relativity somehow contradicts the these Newtonian results. If general relativity did imply that gravity is not responsible for the tides that result would have falsified general relativity.

 

 

Until you do all of the above that you are spouting nonsense.

[jsaldea12]

I was referring to ATTRACTION kind of gravity, in keeping with the unerring existing law of opposite. This is the gravity of Newton.

 

You mentioned that (the raising of sea water on earth is explained by Einstein theories. Please disclose how?.

 

Even the predict (light will bend on passing through sun can be also explained by attraction gravity. Even extra perihelion of Mercury may be explained by attraction gravity of Newton. But both the attraction gravity of Newton and spacetime gravity of Eintein are involved, both are like two sides in one coin)

 

 

Jsaldea12

 

6.30.09

[mooeypoo]

I was referring to ATTRACTION kind of gravity, in keeping with the unerring existing law of opposite. This is the gravity of Newton.

But there is no "anti gravity". There IS NO opposite for gravity, gravity is an ATTRACTING force. There's no such thing as a repelling gravity.

 

By "Laws of Opposite" Do you mean Newton's Second Law? That's not laws of opposite, it defines the reaction of objects to forces exerted on them.. that does not make gravity 'dual' or 'opposite'. Gravity is attracting. By definition.....

 

You mentioned that (the raising of sea water on earth is explained by Einstein theories. Please disclose how?.

http://www.iit.edu/~johnsonp/smart00/lesson4.htm

http://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=289

 

The above are the small tidbits on the physics of tides. We know how tides work.

 

Even the predict (light will bend on passing through sun can be also explained by attraction gravity. Even extra perihelion of Mercury may be explained by attraction gravity of Newton. But both the attraction gravity of Newton and spacetime gravity of Eintein are involved, both are like two sides in one coin)

Not quite, they have different effects.. but you are right about both being affected by gravity.

 

I don't quite get your claim, then. So.. everything is affected by gravity?

 

 

Einstein's relativity does not completely negate Newton's laws, you know.. there *are* other things out there other than gravity.

[jsaldea12]

Hi! Of course we cannot feel the tide, if we cannot see it. Neither can we feel electro-magnetism generated by the motion of gravitational field of earth and the moon, both with inherent electro-magnetic property. Such generated electro-magnetism generated at gravitational extra-ordinarily weak, weak vibration level. But the huge size of gargantuan bodies such as the moon and earth feel it…because their combined electro-magnetism at their size, all rolled into one, like rolled bundle of strings, has such force, raise tide.

 

 

The truth is, Newton and up to now, NO ONE CAN EXPLAIN WHAT IS THAT ATTRACTION. EXCEPT IT IS ATTRACTION. It is actually the action of law of opposite: UNLIKE ATTRACT., this is what I further refer as attraction gravity of Newton, to distinguish from the spacetime gravity of Einstein.

 

 

The raising of the tide on earth can be explained by Dr. Einstein theories? PLEASE DISCLOSE HOW?

 

 

Even the “predicts” of Einstein (re-light bends when passing nearby sun, and may be extra periphelion of Mercury can be explained, jointly by attraction gravity of Newton and Einstein gravity..

 

Evidence is very clear: the raising of the tide on earth happens only when the moon is overhead. .or when the sun, jointly is overhead. But when the sun alone raises tide on earth, it is half raised. Why because the sun is 93 million miles away while the moon is 240,000 miles. As I said, evidence is clear: because of the nearness of the moon, its gravitational pull is stronger. (Is that Einstein spacetime gravity?) A picture is worth a thousand words, an evidence is worth a thousand calculations that ultimately based its computation on actual evidence..

 

But I hope you could disclose how spacetime gravity of Einstein can raise tide on earth.

 

Jsaldea12

 

6.30.09

 

 

.

[swansont]

 

But I hope you could disclose how spacetime gravity of Einstein can raise tide on earth.

 

 

General relativity reduces to Newtonian gravity. It explains the tides exactly the same way that Newtonian gravity does, that there is a gradient in the force which varies with distance.

 

You need to present scientific support for your assertions, and you have been given several suggestions on how to go about doing this. "Proof by repeated assertion" was not one of them. If your discussion does not start containing some scientific content, it will be closed.