Norman Albers Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 [math][ik,m] = \tfrac{1}{2}(\frac{\partial g_{im}}{\partial x^k}+\frac{\partial g_{km}}{\partial x^i} - \frac{\partial g_{ik}}{\partial x^m})[/math], and [math]\{^m_{ik}\} = g^{mn}[ik,n][/math]. This took quite a while to learn to compose, yes!!! How satisfying to speak the same language. Party at the TOWER.
xoxpe Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 i like F=ma because it's simple... unlike the others.. btw, i am a newbie here, nice to meet u all in this forum
woelen Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 cos(pi/5) = ¼ + ¼*√5 I like this one most, because I derived it myself as highschool boy, long before I ever had heard of group theory, Galois theory etc. At school we only had to learn cos(pi), cos(pi/2), cos(pi/3), cos(pi/4) and cos(pi/6) as special values. It was very striking to me that cos(pi/5) also has a special value.
YT2095 Posted September 28, 2006 Posted September 28, 2006 I like: HIO4 + flat raised base = Periodic Table
BigMoosie Posted October 5, 2006 Posted October 5, 2006 Number of ways to pick k items from n choices. I like it because I solved it myself before I was studying probability, only to learn that Pascal beat me by several hundred years. [math]^nC_k = \frac{n!}{(n-k)!k!}[/math]
Sequence Posted November 5, 2006 Posted November 5, 2006 y=mx+b slope intercept form of an equation. Don't know why I like it.
Gilded Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 I like mostly because I haven't got the slightest what it's all about. It has something to do with Yukawa interaction between a scalar and a Majorana field.
Sayonara Posted November 7, 2006 Posted November 7, 2006 It has something to do with Yukawa interaction between a scalar and a Majorana field. Marijuana field more like
Guest Veritas Posted November 9, 2006 Posted November 9, 2006 I have to say my personal favourite is Newton's second law of motion: F=ma. Why? It's simple, sleak and the only one I can remember without thinking for a second. But of course, the three main kinematic relations: v=u+at s=ut+0.5at² v²=u²+2as and obviously their angular brothers which I don't know how to write the symbols for on the computer. Derek.
Eureko Posted December 1, 2007 Posted December 1, 2007 I voted for this (integ(uv) = uv - integ(v du))one cause in Spanish (I am Spaniard) we memorice it with a funny phrase: S(uv) = uv-S(v du). S(uv) = Un Viejo-Salido(Viola Dos Universitarias). And this means: A green old man raped two universitarian girls. Funny?
Fred56 Posted December 2, 2007 Posted December 2, 2007 I like Lagrange (and Laplace) transforms, they're pretty cool. Or this: [math]1... (H=\sum_i \Delta_i X_i)[/math] [math]2... H=\sum_i (\Delta_i X_i + h_i Z_i) +\sum_{ij} J_ij Z_i Z_j[/math] [math]3... H=\sum_i h_i Z_i +\sum_{ij} J_ij Z_i Z_j[/math] [math]4... E=\sum_i h_i s_i +\sum_{ij} J_ij s_i s_j[/math] ..which defines a quantum 'process', apparently (and the ordering is crucial). But I only have an idea what it all means (X and Z are the Pauli matrices, at least I know what a matrix is)...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now