AtomicMX Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 Did the holocaust really happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgerlica Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 Well, it seems the nazis' were quite fond of recording their activities. Kind of hard to ignore the evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glider Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 Yep. I'd say there's more than enough evidence. I have met people (patients usually) with those camp numbers tattooed on their arms too. That many people don't conspire to tattoo themselves just to support a false case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atinymonkey Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 Did the holocaust really happen? It's more interesting to ask who thinks it did not happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted June 15, 2004 Share Posted June 15, 2004 I'd agree. Conspiracy theories ahoy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtomicMX Posted June 16, 2004 Author Share Posted June 16, 2004 Well i'm talking that of burning more than 6 millions of jews.... i mean... sounds kinda impossible... i do not doubt there were concentration camps.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budullewraagh Posted June 16, 2004 Share Posted June 16, 2004 6 million jews and 6-7 million catholics, gypsies, homosexuals, handiacapped. records were kept; the germans always have been precise in their actions. actually, one of the main reasons for the efficiency of the holocaust is ibm. they sold machines to the nazis that made death camps much more efficient. sad but true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted June 16, 2004 Share Posted June 16, 2004 Well i'm talking that of burning more than 6 millions of jews.... i mean... sounds kinda impossible... i do not doubt there were concentration camps.... Not burning, gassing. Gassing is much more efficient. You can get hundreds at a time. Many weren't cremated by the time the allies captured the camps. The Germans had to dig mass graves and burn them all instead of properly cremating to keep up. And remember, this started before WWII, in the 30's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted June 16, 2004 Share Posted June 16, 2004 I don't think they had any plans to cremate the remains "properly" tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[Tycho?] Posted June 25, 2004 Share Posted June 25, 2004 Not burning' date=' gassing. Gassing is much more efficient. You can get hundreds at a time. Many weren't cremated by the time the allies captured the camps. The Germans had to dig mass graves and burn them all instead of properly cremating to keep up. And remember, this started before WWII, in the 30's.[/quote'] In the 30s is was very minor though. Mostly just precursor stuff, preventing jews from holding certain jobs, requireing them to have certain identification, same with other minorities. Shipping them to camps started a bit in the late 30s but only really got going once the war was actually on. edit: and yes, as has been stated, the Germans were very meticulous about their records and photo/video documentation. It seems unlikely that it would be some sort of hoax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admiral_ju00 Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 Uhm. Wow. This one has me stomped. I thought that all the movies, pictures, people(survivors), the mass graves, the concentration camps(and it's equipment: ie: ovens, gas chambers, etc), etc was enough to satisfy anybody. Or are you saying that it was just a Conspiracy? A very elaborate and well though of, at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admiral_ju00 Posted June 26, 2004 Share Posted June 26, 2004 ......Not burning.................And remember' date=' this started before WWII, in the 30's......[/quote'] Uhm no. They were Burning & Shooting, but like you said, it was very inefficient and cumbersome, so they devised the gas chambers. It's interesting to note one of the earliest ways of their gassing uhm prototype. They would cram as many as they can into a truck and the exhaust pipes where going into the truck's (really don't know what it's called). They would then drive the truck for a while and the people inside would die because of carbon monoxide fumes. This WAS happening in the from the Late 30's to mid 40's. Before the Reich decided to implement the Final Solution, people, were told to get out of the Fatherland. Meaning those that could afford the passage could leave. Or at least try to. Some countries refused these Jewish refugees, including USA. I know of at least 1 occurrence where a ship full of Jews trying to escape the Nazi Germany was turned back at Ellis Island. The other thing is, WHY would they Cremate the very people that they were Killing? IBM details: http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/ibm.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted July 3, 2004 Share Posted July 3, 2004 Lets not get carried away here. It wasn't IBM which murdered anyone and the Nazis were quite capable of arranging mass murder without outside intervention. Big company bashing maybe fun but it isn't good history. With such a serious subject the truth is more important than someone trying to make some money with a book by doing some muckraking. Be a bit more critical of the sources, if someone writes a book they are probably a bit bias in favour of it, any independant corroboration? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted July 3, 2004 Share Posted July 3, 2004 Also, no mass murders were taking place before WW2, repression but not mass murder. The holocaust started in 1942 after the Wansee conference where the plan was finalised. The monoxide trucks were briefly in use in 1942 before being replaced by more efficent forms of murder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atinymonkey Posted July 4, 2004 Share Posted July 4, 2004 They had a eugenics programme in place from 1932, which people tend to assume was the start of murders. It wasn't, it was a sterilisation programme and not a cleansing programme but I guess that’s what is being referenced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budullewraagh Posted July 5, 2004 Share Posted July 5, 2004 Also, no mass murders were taking place before WW2, repression but not mass murder. so incredibly false. think armenian genocide. think aztec genocide. think of the chinese! seriously. tens of millions of chinese have been killed at the hands of japanese imperials over the years. note: this started hundreds of years ago. the japanese were so sore about noryang point. sheesh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atinymonkey Posted July 5, 2004 Share Posted July 5, 2004 *cough* no mass murders prior to WWII in Germany by the national socialist party. Better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted July 5, 2004 Share Posted July 5, 2004 I suspect he meant in pre-war Germany. Damn - pipped at the post by a tiny monkey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted July 5, 2004 Share Posted July 5, 2004 Yes, we're talking about Germany here, not the Aztecs or Armenians. That is the topic of the thread so i assumed it didnt need restating. sheesh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kbzon59 Posted July 7, 2004 Share Posted July 7, 2004 Atomic is talking about the revisionist, who say that it is impossible taht teh nazis woluld kill 6 million jews, based on the "fact" that killing 6 million people, would make jews dissapear. Also, they say that if 6 million had been killed, Europe would currently be deserted. the revisioniost say that the 6 million "lie" was invented by the Sionist society opr some shit like taht. They say that since it wasnt 6 million, we should not worry, and becasue of that lie, governmetes should crumble Oh, and they say that probably, it was obnly 3 million, so it was unimportant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atinymonkey Posted July 7, 2004 Share Posted July 7, 2004 I think he's referring to Captain America's work in averting the atrocities, which led to him being trapped in Antarctica. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admiral_ju00 Posted July 8, 2004 Share Posted July 8, 2004 tens of millions of chinese have been killed at the hands of japanese imperials over the years. note: this started hundreds of years ago. the japanese were so sore about noryang point. sheesh Japanese have always considered themselves as the master race (of Asians), hence their need to conquer and control all of Asia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budullewraagh Posted July 8, 2004 Share Posted July 8, 2004 mmm, and the chinese considered themselves to be the "middle kingdom". of course, their isolation policy doomed them when the opium war came about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ydoaPs Posted August 21, 2004 Share Posted August 21, 2004 what idiots say it didn't happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtomicMX Posted August 23, 2004 Author Share Posted August 23, 2004 well, i am perfeclty sure that the nazis gas killed people, but plenty countries has, what i mean is that is not possible to kill people that does not exist (6 millions of jews), further more to have PLENTY lots of jews who magically scaped etc etc etc... so... we are talking about more than 6 millions of jews in those times in that area..... give me a break. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now