Sayonara Posted June 23, 2004 Posted June 23, 2004 Does anyone know about the conditions and mechanisms that would be involved in the formation and duration of a nuclear winter, of the kind caused by a massive impact? I am not interested in supposition, I am interested in things like: - Relationship between impact force and period taken for dust to fill the atmosphere, - Relationship between impact force and mass of dust/debris lifted, - The mass of dust required to block out all light from the sun, - Any information related to dissipation of the dust, - Information on surface and atmospheric conditions, E.G. how fast does the surface temperature of the planet drop, does convection in the upper atmosphere cause turbulence and electrical storms, how far does UV penetrate, etc.
senexa Posted June 23, 2004 Posted June 23, 2004 I don't know how much this will help you, but it is fun to play with: The Nuclear Weapon Effects Calculator http://www.nuclearwinter.com/ It is a wonderful stress reliever for those bad brain days.
Sayonara Posted June 23, 2004 Author Posted June 23, 2004 The requested URL /nukeotron/ was not found on this server. lol Thanks anyway
admiral_ju00 Posted June 24, 2004 Posted June 24, 2004 You'll be suprised by how little does the overall temp has to inc or dec in order to wreck havok on the ecology as we know it. I dunno if you were ever introduced to the Snowball Earth Theory, but it's quite intriguing. Here's a linky: http://ecosystems.wcp.muohio.edu/studentresearch/climatechange02/snowball/articles/Background.htm Also, according to this, Nuclear Winter theory was 1st presented in the Journal Science in 1983 by Carl Sagan. So if you have the access to Science Online, then you should get that paper. http://nyny.essortment.com/whatisnuclear_rioc.htm Other than that, I couldn't find anything on the web that's comming from a pure scientific paper/perspective. So I'd hit the journal for details.
Sayonara Posted June 24, 2004 Author Posted June 24, 2004 Science Online doesn't go back past Oct 1995. I know the paper title and the volume it was in, it's just (a) not there and (b) not actually that useful to someone asking the sort of questions that I asked. RTFFP
Skye Posted June 24, 2004 Posted June 24, 2004 http://keith.aa.washington.edu/papers/asteroidsIII.pdf
Sayonara Posted June 24, 2004 Author Posted June 24, 2004 I did find this: http://personals.galaxyinternet.net/tunga/TA.pdf While I disagree with his many of his assumptions and interpretations, some of the information he is basing it on is very useful.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now