ABV Posted September 13, 2009 Posted September 13, 2009 DO NOT CLOSE THIS TOPIC WITHOUT DISCUSSION! IF YOU THINK SCIENE IS RELIGION THAN I BETTER FIND ANOTHER FORUM AND I WILL BLAME THIS SITE FOREVER. http://knol.google.com/k/alex-belov/paradox-of-classical-mechanics-2/1xmqm1l0s4ys/9# The experiment_2 animations This is animation based on classical mechnics laws This is animation based on theory of standalone rotation with translation movement. The Natural Experiment 2. I made 3 successful experiments with 2 pencils. On all these experiments pencils with rotation movement have lower velocity than pencils without rotation. The theory is CORRECT. The simulator is WRONG. Build and materilas. 2 pencils and thin rubberband 3.5'' from Staples store. The rubberband repulce 2 objects(2 pencils). Two their parts have opposite velocities to each other. After initial action the rubberband has velocity zero. The rubberband mass much less then pencil mass. Here is some snapshots which shows experiment dynamic. Links to experiments movies (avi files) Experiment 2_1 Experiment 2_2 Experiment 2_3 Links to experiments pictures (zip files) Experiment 2_1 Experiment 2_2 Experiment 2_3 P.S. Before say something do natural experiment first and show results please.
Bignose Posted September 13, 2009 Posted September 13, 2009 I made 3 successful experiments with 2 pencils. I see the movies, but where are the measurements from the movies? Where are the predictions from your supposed new idea and then the experiment that objectively and quantitatively matches the idea? I.e. I want to see: experiment predicts x m/s velocity and y rad/s of rotation and my measurements from experiment are a m/s and b rad/s, which are z% of the prediction. Hopefully z is close to 100%. I see nothing like that. Without this, it is just word salad and pictures.
Recommended Posts