elas Posted September 16, 2009 Posted September 16, 2009 (edited) Chuck Norris (Lepton) Where does anti matter go? I read somewhere that for every particle of matter ''created'' there is an antimatter equvalent. So what happened to the antimatter? Last edited by Chuck Norris; September 3rd, 2009 at 5:29 AM. swansont (Shaken, not stirred) Physics Expert Moderator That's one of the big unanswered questions of cosmology and particle physics. Antimatter can change into matter in some rare circumstances, called CP (charge+parity) violation, but the observed events (in Kaons and B mesons) do not happen often enough to account for the disparity. Pasted from <http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=43674> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Accountants, Stock controllers and Police officers know that a negative quantity refers to an entity, property or quantity that is missing; the missing item itself, when found; has a positive presence. All three (accountant, stock controller and police officer) realise that negative entities cannot exist in the real world; negative quantities are a mathematical statement that can only be explained with the discovery of the missing (positive) reality. The cause of the missing anti-matter is explained using the gravitational interaction. The role of gravitational force in particle structure is explained in the equation mr=g/2 (note that this equation originates from the mathematics used to construct a balanced field graph) (see: http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=40962) The balanced field model can also explain atomic element structure see: http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=38674 The first requirement in the construction of a stable particle is that the internal forces are balanced in both direction and quantity. Figs. A and B show G force and anti-G force for bodies without a central mass. (The gravity field being a partial vacuum field where vacuum is opposed by the elasticity of matter). The second requirement is that the particles are structurally sound; the anti-particle has its maximum vacuum force at the centre of its radius and is therefore structurally unsound. The particle has its maximum vacuum force at the centre of its diameter and is therefore structurally sound. The elementary particle in its anti-particle charged state has a limited life time due to its unsound structure; that unsound structure, causes the vacuum field of positively charged states of the elementary particle to collapse converting the positive charged elementary particle into its '0' charge state (i.e. matter without a three dimensional vacuum field; the vacuum field is present in the form of a dimensionless '0' point). Experimenters do not observe the separate force and anti-force shown in figs. A and B, they (the experimenters) observe the interaction of force and anti-force as shown in figs. C and D, where the sum of the force values are equal in force and opposite in direction (see table); this 1:1 ratio is found in all charged states of the elementary particle and is given a nominal charge value of 1. Anti-matter as defined in the Standard model is not found in nature because it does not exist in the negative form proposed by the Standard model interpretation. The difference between actual values (figs. A and B) and observed values (figs. C and D) gives rise to the missing matter known as dark matter. The left hand scale is in ev. The bottom scale is the radius in arbitrary values (to shorten download time). The right hand scale is the sum of the forces measured at regular intervals along the radius as shown in the red box at the end of the table; e has a nominal value of -1; p has a nominal value of +1. The 'mass' value (510998.9ev) is common to all four graphs. (It is possible in MS Excel, to create the graphs using actual values but, I find the result cannot be transferred to Adobe Illustrator or copied to a web page hence the use of some arbitrary values). Edited September 16, 2009 by elas
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now