String theory proposal

[GF]

Hi, on Oct 3rd/2009 I started posting my proposals. My first revealing of my ideas was on Garret Lisi's forum ( he proposes a Theory of Everything on the e8 gauge structure). Ironically he's a skeptic of string theory but he's brilliant and I can't wait for any replys but the thread is very old and kind of inactive. I have found Harvards forum and my thread is just sitting there dormant for a day now hehe. I am waiting to be registered at Cornell still. You will find amusing that some geek at a big school forum website that hosts Oxford and Cambridge student forums has deleted my thread (same material copied from what I posted at every other forum) because he considered it spam and just up and deleted it right away lol bloody wanker.

 

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/107

 

- thats Garret Lisi's forum and you can get upto speed with the latest buzz over his progress and my proposals are the last posts - you can't edit so I hadto repost once or twice just to clean up my entries.

 

 

Here's my proposals in full and all I'm hoping for is for people who understand the beauty of what I have done. String Theory is more philosophical than practical. Even Einsteins Theory of Relativity at times today is still walked over and considered obsolete so remember everythings relative (hehe) and my equation in my best description is a mathematical description of an entity incapable of exisitng in the 4th dimension ... in other words it can only exist in the theoretical (ether, thought , spirit, dream , existential etc. etc.) of the 5th dimension!

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

GOD/SUPERSYMMETRY/SUPERFLUID/ZEROPOINT/VACUUM EQUATION:

 

mean Mass = sum U(SampleSpace)/ DegreesOfFreedom

 

( ex. dodecahedron .... meanM=sumU/DOF

 

meanM=(1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13)/13

 

meanM=91/13

 

meanM=7 )

 

GF SPHERE/STRING THEOREM:

 

sumU/DOF=(DOF+1)/2

 

( ex. dodecahedron .... (1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13)/13=(13+1)/2

 

91/13=(14)/2

 

7=7 )

 

Works for ANY length of string or ANY size of sphere

 

*wink

 

(props to whoever defined "sample space" - that quality haunted me for years until I came across it at Wikipedia)

 

 

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------

 

 

Followup:

 

 

 

I may sound condesending or arrogant ... but unfortunately people capable of grasping these things are in the minority. Add in the fact that most physicists let ego rule their logic and you will understand that I face an uphill battle.

 

Quantum physics is an illusion. It exists in the 5th dimension called "ether" or "spirit" or "thought" or "the existential" etc. etc. I may even go as far as to say that the 5th dimension (quantum realm) can only be known in "cyberspace".

 

Its the "esoteric" realm ... like astrology, numerology, or tarot cards ... something ruled by patterns but it seeks to end "freewill" and it believes in "fate" (determinism if you prefer). Its what's literally known as "black magic". All illusion.

 

Science and true physics on the other hand are "white magic" and based on truth. Any serious philosopher knows the fundamentals to knowledge require the understanding of the "Heisenburg Uncertainty Principle" which basically states that "nothing can be measured perfectly because the measurement/measurer effects the outcome". Ever heard of a band called "The Perfect Circle"? True measurement or things like zero do not exist! ...did you know in medevial times that any discussion or belief in zero was cause for arrest or put to death?

 

 

Quantum physicists are trying to break the laws of reality and create "free energy/zero point energy" when any intelligent physicist or philosopher knows that the best we can philosophically ever do is 99.999~ effeciency!

 

 

Its all about the "god particle" called the Higgs Boson ... yet here's where I find extreme irony ... I'm an Agnostic ... I know that god is suprarational and "unknowable". You cannot prove god exits because god is inconceivable. I do believe in the "possibility" of god and I am extremely religious but I know an incarnate living god is IMPOSSIBLE.

 

Here's the irony ... I am astounded when I find a person (typically an athiest) who is absolutely certain a Higgs Boson can be proved to exist YET IN NO WAY COULD EVER CONSIDER THAT GOD CAN EXIST. The Higgs Boson and an incarnate god ARE OF THE SAME PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPT!

 

Now I am not saying quantum physics doesn't have its uses ... but what I am saying is that I can evaluate a persons intellect simply by knowing if they know the possibility of what can and cannot exist in such examples as supersymmetry, zero, a perfect vacuum, a perfect superfluid. All these things CANNOT EXIST IN REALITY AND ONLY EXIST IN OUR THEORYS/THOUGHTS/ON PAPER/IN THE 5TH DIMENSION!

 

 

We live between the 4th dimension(time) and the 5th(quintessence/ether/dreams/thought/spirit etc. etc.)

 

 

My "god' equation is a very pompous title ... its more literally the description of the perfect supersymmetrical dimension, superfluid, or zeropoint vacuum.

 

I consider my "GF String/Sphere Theorem" the "Pythagorean Theorem" of the 21st century. Its based on any length string or any size sphere!

 

Try and think of an equation that adds as perfectly as mine does AND YET STILL APPLYS TO BOTH STRINGS AND SPHERES!

 

 

I face an uphill battle against quantum magicians and simpletons too uneducated to grasp the beauty of my theoretical equations.

 

 

I just want some support. Theres more than just math to this ... ITS ALL POLITICS AND QUANTUM PHYSICISTS SUCKING UP FUNDING MONEY FOR THEIR HUMMERS AND CHEESEBURGERS FOOLING UNEDUCATED BUSINESSMEN INTO THINKING THEY CAN DO "MAGIC" ...

 

 

Please spread the word about my equations. I am ready to straighten out all the bs goin on.

 

 

GF

[insane_alien]

I am ready to straighten out all the bs goin on.

 

i suggest you start with your post.

[ajb]

 

 

Its all about the "god particle" called the Higgs Boson ... yet here's where I find extreme irony ... I'm an Agnostic ... I know that god is suprarational and "unknowable". You cannot prove god exits because god is inconceivable. I do believe in the "possibility" of god and I am extremely religious but I know an incarnate living god is IMPOSSIBLE.

 

Here's the irony ... I am astounded when I find a person (typically an athiest) who is absolutely certain a Higgs Boson can be proved to exist YET IN NO WAY COULD EVER CONSIDER THAT GOD CAN EXIST. The Higgs Boson and an incarnate god ARE OF THE SAME PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPT!

 

 

I hope this is meant as some kind of joke?

 

I believe the name "God particle" comes from a book by Lederman. The problem is that the Higgs particle (or the Higgs-Kibble mechanism) has nothing to do with religion. It is quite possible the Higgs boson is not part of nature and some other mechanism is in play. Calling it the "God particle" may be a huge overplay.

 

 

Garret Lisi's [math]E_{8}[/math] gauge theory (built using Quillen superconnections) has received mixed reviews by the theoretical and mathematical physics community. I have not studied the paper myself, nor have I heard many people really discussing it.

Edited October 4, 2009 by ajb

[GF]

Yes we know that the Higgs boson is not literally god but you should realize that it is deemed so important that people "SYMBOLICALLY" compare it to god.

 

I only made that point because of the huge irony that people believe in a Higgs but not in any form of a spiritual god yet both similiarly cannot be definitively proven to exist (physically).

[insane_alien]

and no where in the scientific literature(peer review papers and such) is it called the god particle. just in popsci and journalism.

[ydoaPs]

i suggest you start with your post.

 

I second that motion.

[ajb]

Yes we know that the Higgs boson is not literally god but you should realize that it is deemed so important that people "SYMBOLICALLY" compare it to god.

 

I only made that point because of the huge irony that people believe in a Higgs but not in any form of a spiritual god yet both similiarly cannot be definitively proven to exist (physically).

 

 

I don't think it is so important in the grand scheme of things.

 

The Higgs-Kibble mechanism is simply "bolted onto" gauge theory to produce the standard model and is generally though of as "very ugly". It is also true that this part of the standard model is so far experimentally missing. It is quite possible a Higgs (or several of them) could be found an the LHC soon.

 

Even without the experimental evidence of the Higgs particle, the standard model seems remarkably accurate.

 

You should also be aware that other scenarios have been proposed to break electoweak symmetry. Probably the best candidate instead of a Higgs is technicolor.

 

Anyway, this is all very different to any "proof of god" etc. People don't just believe in the Higgs-Kibble mechanism, you can preform calculations and make phenomenological predictions. Some (but not all) particle theorists and phenomenologists think it is the most likely mechanism for electoweak symmetry breaking. Not just blind faith.

 

What you could be referring to is the possibility that the electroweak scale is higher than we think and thus the Higgs will not be discovered any time soon. Not finding a Higgs may not rule it out. You would have to talk to a phenomenologist to put numbers into this. This scale is also tied in with SUSY.

 

It is possible that nature uses some so far undiscovered trick.

Edited October 4, 2009 by ajb

[GF]

ajb, I love Dr. Who!!

 

Thanks for mentioning Technicolor and it does look promising. Funny how its the first wiki article of that type where there wasn't a big "Opponents views" section although it seems to be a newer branch of physics.

 

Garret Lisi doesn't believe Superpartners which are needed for SUSY will be discovered at the LHC (which I also believe). Stephen Hawking doesn't believe a Higgs Boson will be found at the LHC (which I also believe). Both Superpartners and the Higgs Boson are required in Tehnicolor ... so I guess we'll see what the LHC will reveal eventually.

 

Ironically, I'm working on my 3rd and final installment of more explanation of my equations and will also give my thoughts on what will happen with the LHC.

 

I appreciate your allowance of me to get my ideas on the internet here on your forum because its a good experience helping me to iron out my proposals.

 

 

I'm slowly piecing together my plan of action and coming up with ideas about who I need to find who are actually sharp enough to grasp what my equation says. My 3rd installment soon is going to be "way out there" but is going to be the deepest and most overwhelming material about pre-big bang physics ever written and is going to blow many peoples minds away I absolutely promise.

 

 

(ohh and I thought rrw4rusty might like this thread since his thread about absolute vacuum/infiinite mass is literally what my equation stands for)

Edited October 7, 2009 by GF