Genecks Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 About two years ago, I read an article about males having a slightly (fractional) chance of being born over females due to the physical processes of fertilization and the energy used to make the processes happen. In the end, males are born more than females. Does anyone have a link to the article or remember where to find it? I can't remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyrisch Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 I think it's due to the fact that the mass of a sperm containing a Y chromosome as compared to an X chromosome is slightly less, allowing them to move slightly faster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genecks Posted October 9, 2009 Author Share Posted October 9, 2009 I think it's due to the fact that the mass of a sperm containing a Y chromosome as compared to an X chromosome is slightly less, allowing them to move slightly faster. Yeah, but I'm looking for the article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDG Posted October 9, 2009 Share Posted October 9, 2009 I don't know if this is the article you are looking for, but here is a 1999 paper about gender selection using a "swim up" procedure. The procedure is based on the theory that Y sperm (because they are less massive) swim faster than X sperm. In this study, 86.7% of those seeking a girl were successful, and 89.2% of those seeking a boy were successful. M.A. Khatamee et al., "A controlled study for gender selection using swim-up separation" Gynecol Obstet Invest (1999) 48(1):7-13. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Skeptic Posted October 10, 2009 Share Posted October 10, 2009 On the other hand, males also have a higher mortality rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougalbod Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 While the average speed of 'male' vs 'female' sperm may be a factor it's far too simplistic to think that this by itself is the cause of an imbalance in the gender of offspring. If there are more male offspring than female then their is a selective advantage to producing offspring of the less common gender. As Mr Skeptic said, males (at least for humans and I guess for many other mammal species) have a higher mortality rate before reaching sexual maturity. This does seem like a better reason for the gender imbalance at birth. Does anybody know of a species where the imbalance is more significant? - I know social insects produce far more males than females but they have weird genetics - My guess is that for most species the a 50:50 balance (more or less ) is maintained. Dougal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDG Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 While the average speed of 'male' vs 'female' sperm may be a factor it's far too simplistic to think that this by itself is the cause of an imbalance in the gender of offspring. Except that the actual OP was directed toward that physical difference. Just saying that there must be some evolutionary reason for the difference does not explain the mechanism that implements the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Skeptic Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 I've also heard that in some species, more males are born if the mother is well-nourished, whereas more females when she is malnourished. A weak female will have less trouble finding a mate than a weak male, whereas a strong male might get several mates to reproduce with but the female's reproductive rate can't increase by much. I don't know whether the mechanism for this is pre or post fertilization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now