Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Isn't it [math]0^0[/math'], which means "how many 0s are there in 0" = 1.

 

That's 0/0, and in any case your reasoning is hideously flawed.

 

One 0 makes 0.

 

Two 0's (0*0 or 2*0) make 0.

 

Three 0's (0*0*0 or 3*0) make 0.

 

And so on to infinity.

 

Which one of those is 'right'?

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
They most definitely are not.

 

However' date=' 0^0 should be strictly speaking undefined, as the proof by notation that works for x^0 where x =! 0 doesn't hold if x = 0.[/quote']

why not?

 

0/0 is like 0^a/0^a=0^(a-a)=0^0

 

now why this is wrong?

 

 

wait a minute perhaps it's not the same because zero can be represented in infinite state of powers:

0^a/0^2a=0^(a-2a)

  • 1 month later...
Guest eyedea
Posted

0^0 is an "indeterminate", which is different than an undefined value. It means that it has been proven to be unexplainable. There are other indeterminates such as infinity^0, infinity/infinity, infinity/0, and some others.

Posted

hmm you're not right

1, In High School Math, 0^0 and 0/0 are both undefined.

2, But in University, I am not sure.

3, Even if 0^0 is undefined, you cannot say 0^0 'EQUALS' undefined. It's a serious mistake.

Posted
hmm you're not right

1' date=' In High School Math, 0^0 and 0/0 are both undefined.

2, But in University, I am not sure.

3, Even if 0^0 is undefined, you cannot say 0^0 [b']'EQUALS'[/b] undefined. It's a serious mistake.

1. True.

2. They still are undefined at the University level, and beyond.

3. True.

Posted
0^0 is the same as 0/0, that's why x^0, where x is not 0 is x/x=1

 

What you're arguing from is the fact that that x^n/x^m generally equals x^(n-m), but it dods not neccessarily follow that x^0 = 0/0. You should be very, very careful about equating any intdeterminate or undwefined values.

Posted
its like dividing anything by zero, it must be undifined...but mathmatically it comes out to 1...but thats probably just off of a theorem...Im sure there's a proof behind it.

 

Say what now?

Posted

is there a proof behind dividing something by 0...or a proof for having 0 to the 0??

 

My palm calculator probably just made it =1 because it was raised to the 0th power, and anything to the 0th is 1...even tho its undefined

Posted
0^0 is an "indeterminate", which is different than an undefined value. It means that it has been proven to be unexplainable. There are other indeterminates such as infinity^0, infinity/infinity, infinity/0, and some others

 

0^0 is just undefined.

 

You end up with indeterminate quantities when while taking a limit both numerator and denominator approach 0. But then too there is the easy way out of applying L'Hospital's rule and getting a value. Indeterminate merely implies that it may have different values in different situations.

Posted
So far, my book told me x^0=1 when x is not equal to 0.

 

Read the link in my first post on the subject.

Posted

0^0 is not 1.

0/0 does not equal one, because 0 can be contained in 0 in more times than just 1. It's perhaps all real values, kinda like if x=a^2; then x has two solutions, a and -a, but that doesn't mean a=-a. In order for modern mathematicians to get this problem out of their way instead of solving like the good ol' times, they went ahead and said, "It's undefined."

Posted
0^0 is not 1.
Correct.

 

0/0 does not equal one,
Correct.

 

because 0 can be contained in 0 in more times than just 1.
Nope. It's due to the fact that [math]a/b = c \iff a = b \cdot c[/math], where [math]c[/math] is unique for a given [math]a[/math] and [math]b[/math]. Note that if [math]b=0[/math] and [math]a[/math] is fixed, c can be any value, and therefore, it is not unique. Thus, division of any number by [math]0[/math] is undefined.

 

It's perhaps all real values,
Nope. Division of two real numbers is not a multiple valued operation. An example of a multiple valued operation is [math]\pm[/math]. An example is the quadratic formula (i.e. if [math]f(x)=ax^2+bx+c, x=\frac{-b\pm \sqrt {b^2-4ac}}{2a}[/math]).

 

In order for modern mathematicians to get this problem out of their way instead of solving like the good ol' times, they went ahead and said, "It's undefined."
Assigning a numerical value to these concepts that does not conflict with the definitions of division is currently, and may never be, possible. Thus, the "undefined" moniker.
Posted

0/0=R and all imaginary numbers.

if a/b=c, and a is 0, then c is 0 and can't be any other number but 0.

+or-, thanks for the reminder. For the sake of logical thought and processing, since there can be two values for a quadratic equation, and 3 for a cubic, and so on, for x/0, or rather 0/0 there are in infinite number of solutions.

 

0/0=? 1

0/0=1/1*0/0

0/0=0/0 correct

All real numbers and imaginary numbers follow the same pattern if 1 is replaced by x or any variable that you choose.

Posted
0/0=R and all imaginary numbers.

if a/b=c' date=' and a is 0, then c is 0 and can't be any other number but 0.

+or-, thanks for the reminder. For the sake of logical thought and processing, since there can be two values for a quadratic equation, and 3 for a cubic, and so on, for x/0, or rather 0/0 there are in infinite number of solutions.

 

0/0=? 1

0/0=1/1*0/0

0/0=0/0 correct

All real numbers and imaginary numbers follow the same pattern if 1 is replaced by x or any variable that you choose.[/quote']

 

isn't 0/0 undefined?

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.