superchump Posted July 18, 2004 Posted July 18, 2004 Extra...this image is taken inside a crater....a CRA-TER. I don't see why aliens would lay a foundation on the slope of the inside of a crater with the exact same angle as the crater! Btw...here is the fault color image that shows it's just a larger slab of the bedrock surrounded by smaller slabs of bedrock. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/opportunity/20040716a/16-JF-02-crop-B170R1.jpg
superchump Posted July 18, 2004 Posted July 18, 2004 Extra...I suppose that aliens made Giant's Causeway too. Because if it looks artifical it just HAS to be....right?
ExtraSense Posted July 18, 2004 Author Posted July 18, 2004 If you do not make a 3D separation layer, what do you do?And show us the ORIGINAL stereo pictures. Here are the links to this particular stereo pair, for the left and right eye. http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportunity/forward_hazcam/2004-07-15/1F143188422EFF3241P1221L0M1.JPG http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportunity/forward_hazcam/2004-07-15/1F143188422EFF3241P1221R0M1.JPG e s
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted July 18, 2004 Posted July 18, 2004 I see. But it still doesn't look like a foundation to me. Lots of it looks like seperate pieces. To save people the trouble of buying 3d glasses, can't you put the pics side by side on your website and have people cross their eyes?
ExtraSense Posted July 18, 2004 Author Posted July 18, 2004 I see.But it still doesn't look like a foundation to me. Lots of it looks like seperate pieces.To save people the trouble of buying 3d glasses, can't you put the pics side by side on your website and have people cross their eyes? Is not it rediculous? $800 mil was just right to get rovers to Mars, but $3 is to much for you to spend to look at the results? e s
superchump Posted July 18, 2004 Posted July 18, 2004 Of course extra ignored everything I said in the last two posts. A crackpot always ignores common sense and logic when presented to them. Extra...face it. You have no firepower in this fight. First your seeing sting rays, now your seeing foundations. What's next? Petrified roast beef sandwiches?
Sayonara Posted July 18, 2004 Posted July 18, 2004 Is not it rediculous? $800 mil was just right to get rovers to Mars, but $3 is to much for you to spend to look at the results? If you have the stereograph images next to each other the right way around, and place a piece of card so that it is between them like a dividing wall, so the left and right eye can only see their respective image, you should get a passable stereoscopic effect.
Sayonara Posted July 18, 2004 Posted July 18, 2004 The method that simulates your vision system without straining it is probably going to be preferable for most people.
mooeypoo Posted July 31, 2004 Posted July 31, 2004 WOW. I've been outa here for a while 'cause of work, and now for the past hour I've been reading posts and catching up. It's just so nice to see things stayed the way they were.... I welcome myself back with a huge all-heartedly laugh. You're hilarious, ES. You always were, and appearantly you always will be ~moo
ExtraSense Posted August 17, 2004 Author Posted August 17, 2004 This Mars Mission will be known as Mission of Fools. Martians are laughing their bellies off. I say, science has went bunkers. Unbelievable! ES
Sayonara Posted August 17, 2004 Posted August 17, 2004 It took you a whole month to come up with that?
ExtraSense Posted August 17, 2004 Author Posted August 17, 2004 It took you a whole month to come up with that? What can I say, if you guys can not spare $3 for 3D glasses? Public matches science, I guess. If anybody were watching my site, he would knew that I have weeded out suspicious interpretations, so now it is 100% correct. 3D works! ES
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted August 17, 2004 Posted August 17, 2004 Heeeeeeee's baaaaaaaack! Come on, just seperate them and put each seperate view side by side, so you don't need to waste 3 bucks on some stupid thing. Maybe you're scared of us realizing that the 3D pics don't make a difference.
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted August 17, 2004 Posted August 17, 2004 Oh, yes, extrasense: Can you come on to chat sometime? I'd enjoy it.
ExtraSense Posted August 17, 2004 Author Posted August 17, 2004 Heeeeeeee's baaaaaaaack! Come on, just seperate them and put each seperate view side by side, so you don't need to waste 3 bucks on some stupid thing. $3 is less than a pack of sigarettes, I can not believe how cheap you are. I have spend more than $1500 on this research. ES
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted August 17, 2004 Posted August 17, 2004 Oh really? How's that? How do you spend that much on it? I'd like it if you were on chat, too. Click chatroom at the top of the page.
superchump Posted August 18, 2004 Posted August 18, 2004 I have spend more than $1500 on this research. Well that makes you the biggest idiot on this board then. It takes me 3 minutes on free software to make my own anaglyphs of the martian surface. Here's an example I just made with Oppy's navcam from sol 201.
ExtraSense Posted August 18, 2004 Author Posted August 18, 2004 Well that makes you .... Work on manners first... By the way, your anaglyph is no good either ES
Sayonara Posted August 18, 2004 Posted August 18, 2004 Work on manners first... By the way, your anaglyph is no good either I wish you were on Mars right now.
superchump Posted August 18, 2004 Posted August 18, 2004 Work on manners first... By the way' date=' your anaglyph is no good either ES[/quote'] How is it any worse than the crap you spew. It's in 3d just like yours isn't it? Why don't you go spend another $1500 and find out you're still delusional. Btw I didn't adjust the layer's position so that is straight left/right navcam data just like anyone else would do; even you.
superchump Posted August 18, 2004 Posted August 18, 2004 I wish you were on Mars right now. You forgot to add "with a spacesuit". Or will his Martian friends help him?
Recommended Posts