Jump to content

Root problem.


Recommended Posts

Here's a possible explanation. Feel free to skip any step if you find it unnecessary and also free to ask if one of the steps is not clear to you: [math] m \sqrt{ kT/m } = \sqrt{m^2} \sqrt{ kT/m } = \sqrt{ m^2kT/m } = \sqrt{mkT} [/math].

Edit: I was assuming that m is a mass, k the Boltzman constant and T the temperature and that hence all of these three variables are positive. You might have to be careful if some of them can be negative, e.g. m=sqrt(m^2) does not hold when m<0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi can I just ask how and why [math]m[/math] can become [math]\sqrt{m^2}[/math] ?

 

 

I've just realised that [math]m[/math] is the same as [math]\sqrt{m^2}[/math]

 

So was it really necessary to simplify [math]m \sqrt{ kT/m }[/math] to [math]\sqrt{mkT}[/math] or could you just have left it as it was?

Edited by Gareth56
Penny dropped!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not absolutely needed and depending on the context either version could be preferable. But usually, the shorter an expression and the less frequent symbols appear, the better.

 

OLD POST, REDUNDANT:

Sure, I am just not sure how to explain it. Seems pretty obvious that the square root of a number squared gives the number. The square root is something like the anti-operation (the technical term is "inverse") of squaring a number. Would you agree that [math]\sqrt{x}^2 = x[/math]? In that case you can rearrange it as [math] \sqrt{m^2} = \sqrt{m\cdot m} = \sqrt m \sqrt m = \sqrt{m}^2 = m[/math]. Perhaps you should also just do some reading on what the square root is and how you rearrange expressions involving it.

 

Or a somewhat more intuitive explanation:

The square root of X tells me which value Y=sqrt(X) I'd have to square to get X. So which value do I have to square to get m-squared? m. Hence m = sqrt(m*m).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

m is almost certainly the symbol for mass, which will always be a positive number. In that case, the square root of the square is always positive as well - there is no ambiguity in taking the square root.

 

I think that [math]\sqrt{mkT}[/math] looks better than [math]m\sqrt{\frac{kT}{m}}[/math], but in the end it is just aesthetics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So was it really necessary to simplify [math]m \sqrt{ kT/m }[/math] to [math]\sqrt{mkT}[/math] or could you just have left it as it was?
When you're trying to find a value for this, two multiplications and a square root is preferable to two multiplications, a square root and a division. Partially because any operation is going to take up computation time and cause a loss of accuracy and also because division in particular is very sensitive to small inaccuracies.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The first equation was m^1 x (kT)^1/2/(m)^1/2, which is (kT)^1/2(m^1)/[m^1/2].

 

m^1 divided by m^1/2 is m^1/2, and (kT)^1/2 is multiplied by that in the above to equal (kT^1/2)(m^1/2), and since the square root of a a dimensionless quantity multiplied by the square root of another dimensionless quantity is the same as the square root of both of those things multiplied together, the previous equation is (kT x m)^1/2 which is of course the same as sqrt(mkT)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.