Fantasy about stars exploding in clear jelly

[david23]

Quantum Gravity just a theory

 

A star explodes in a ball of clear jelly we call space, the star explodes it creates a black hole.

The black hole is shaped like a yard of ale glass, the opening would be the event horizon

the tube being the singularity, and the ball end containing the new galaxy created by the star.

 

The star that created the black hole also created the new galaxy light years away from the even horizon.

like a waterfall the black hole is very similar, the water falls very fast however the water travels some distance to the sea which is greater than the waterfall.

 

That new galaxy had a star explode to create another galaxy and so on to infinity, thats why all galaxies

have black holes. as the apple pip grows into a tree then into orchards, as do black holes and galaxies.

The black hole sucks in part of the star that created it and space/gravity, mass,energy, and surrounding gases, light, and comes out light years away from the event horizon in the form of a new galaxy.

 

The size of the galaxy would depend on the size of the star exploding and matter sucked in, and its

acquired distance in light years. as the black holes in galaxies create more galaxies and more black holes to infinity the ball of clear jelly we call space, expands into infinity. so space will keep on

expanding to infinity, and black holes keep creating more space to maintain the expansion, remember

the apple pip. like an ever growing ball full of galaxies and black holes nature growing its ball from

ever growing singularities.

 

From E=mc2 we gain so much from so little.

Space/gravity through a black hole from being very large to the quantum level is achieved .

 

Time is only a man made concept, there is only distance and space, to distort space would alter gravity

Travel at the speed of light would alter space, due to the distance traveled there would be repercussions

due to traveling in altered space.

 

Gravity ie space being the same, being sucked into a black hole creating more space would pass through into a new galaxy created by the black hole.

going into a black hole would alter space/gravity.

 

inside of a black hole through its singularity would be space and a new born galaxy

to travel back out of a black hole you would need to be pure energy dead, thats why you would see

light on the way out,

pure energy can distort space and be in two different places at once like light

as the split light experiment shows.

 

Black holes would remain open as part of natures lungs allowing space to expand.

how the first black hole was created by a star,

that answer you would have to ask the apple pip as all its apples are inside it.....

 

At the center of the infinity symbol place a symbol for a black hole

 

 

David Stuart Jones

23/9/1951

[Martin]

This is, in my respectful opinion, beautifully presented. The language is evocative. Nice use of familiar images and everyday language.

 

What you have here is a fantasy that borders on poetry.

 

I think this should be encouraged and appreciated, if it is well presented, but should also be distinguished from science.

 

Science is empirical. Every idea should be testable by experiment or by observation. This was proposed by Francis Bacon. He was a contemporary of Shakespeare. We've had this tradition of Empiricism for 400 years now, sometimes referred to as the Baconian tradition. It's under attack. Some people want to give up on testability and go back to an earlier type of pre-Baconian "science" that was more along the lines of explanatory fantasy---a kind of philosophical myth-making without an experimental way to show if it's wrong.

 

About all we can do here is maintain a clear distinction.

So I moved this out of Physics and into Speculations forum.

 

=================

 

There is at least one "tree of universes" concept which purports to be testable. You can read about it in the book by Lee Smolin called "The Life of the Cosmos".

 

What I mean by "tree of universes" is the kind of model where black holes sprout off to make new universes and those universes make more black holes, which in turn sprout further generations of universes. It is a kind of branching picture or "family tree" of existence. His version of the idea allows for small variations at each branch-point----each offspring universe can have slightly different values of the basic constants (the ratio of electric force to gravitational force can be slightly different, or the ratio of masses of basic particles can be slightly different)---the offspring tract of spacetime can be slightly different from the parent tract.

 

In broad outline, Smolin's idea is similar to yours. But he included some mathematical content and thought of a way to test it observationally.

 

The book has been out for about 10 years now. They might have it at your local public library. The idea has been discussed in other books since then. A chapter devoted to it here and there. Also articles about it in the professional physics journals. It has been attacked, and the attacks have been rebutted. The usual stuff that happens in science. Empirical tests have so far not invalidated the idea---it survives.

 

The important distinction, if I can repeat, is that Smolin's version of the idea comes equipped with some quantitative mathematics and several ways to test it (such as measuring the masses of neutron stars, which can be and is being done.) Without that testability feature, the idea would just be a myth, appealing to the imagination.