Shadow Posted November 12, 2009 Posted November 12, 2009 http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20091111/wl_time/08599193737000
DJBruce Posted November 12, 2009 Posted November 12, 2009 Who ever wrote that paper lost all credibility when the suggested the bird was from the future. I also find it somewhat weird that they keep referencing God in their explanation. Instead of math and other scholarly papers.
Shadow Posted November 12, 2009 Author Posted November 12, 2009 I'm shocked something like this even made it to Yahoo!.
doG Posted November 12, 2009 Posted November 12, 2009 I'm shocked something like this even made it to Yahoo!. Or SFN for that matter
Mokele Posted November 12, 2009 Posted November 12, 2009 Now, if the LHC went offline because a Phorusrhacos materialized in the lab and ate 3 post-docs, maybe they'd have a good argument. However, in that case, I would firmly vote for turning it on full-blast, because I want a pet Allosaurus. 1
ydoaPs Posted November 12, 2009 Posted November 12, 2009 However, in that case, I would firmly vote for turning it on full-blast, because I want a pet Allosaurus. While I agree with the sentiment, I'd prefer a magical Leoplurodon. 1
Recommended Posts