MandrakeRoot Posted July 13, 2004 Posted July 13, 2004 I have a nice problem for you guys, just a funny problem to stimulate the mind. For each non-negative integer [math]n[/math], let [math]a_n[/math] be the number of digits in the decimal expansion of [math]2^n[/math] that are at least 5. For example [math]a_{16} = 4,since 2^{16}=65536[/math] has four digits that are 5 or higher. What is the sum [math]\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{a_n}{2^n}[/math] ? I evaluated machinally the first 299 (see attachment) terms a of the sum. The sum converges to 0.086617 numerically, what is the exact value ? What is the growth rate of a_n ? Mandrake a.txt
bloodhound Posted July 16, 2004 Posted July 16, 2004 i would say the growth rate of a_n is about [math]log_{10}2[/math] i still havent studied how to calculate the sum.
Dave Posted July 16, 2004 Posted July 16, 2004 Been looking at the problem, but I can't seem to make any inroads into it atm. Have to give it some more thought.
bloodhound Posted July 16, 2004 Posted July 16, 2004 here a_n should be equal to [edit][math][\log_{10}(2^n)][/math][/edit] where [] is denotes the least integer which is greater than
Dave Posted July 18, 2004 Posted July 18, 2004 Got a proof? And good luck trying to find the infinite series, looks like a pig, specially with that damned [x] crap lying about.
bloodhound Posted July 18, 2004 Posted July 18, 2004 well, havent got a proof, its rather intiuitive. it works for integers greater than one. must be able to prove by induction somehow. about the series, the most i could do here is to check that the series does indeed converge. about the value, got no idea.
Dave Posted July 18, 2004 Posted July 18, 2004 Hmm. I'm just wondering whether an alternative formula for an exists.
bloodhound Posted July 18, 2004 Posted July 18, 2004 an alternative form for a_n would be [2^n/10] where [] means the same thing as before
bloodhound Posted July 18, 2004 Posted July 18, 2004 calculated a_n upto n = 33 , found out some stuff on behaviour of a_n (not proven) if n = 0,1,2,3 mod10 then for each grouping of a_n i.e n=0,1,2,3 : 10,11,12,13,... the a_n's are equal. the same happens for n=4,5,6 mod10 and n=7,8,9 mod10. so basically the grouping seems to have a sequence 4,3,3,4,3,3, for example the first few {a_n} 1,1,1,1, 2,2,2, 3,3,3, 4,4,4,4, 5,5,5, 6,6,6, 7,7,7,7, 8,8,8, 9,9,9, 10,10,10,10, gonna try if i can find the value of the series.
bloodhound Posted July 18, 2004 Posted July 18, 2004 oops seems that i have read the question wrong. i thought a_n was the the number of digits in 2^n. it seems that its number of digits in 2^n at least 5
MandrakeRoot Posted July 24, 2004 Author Posted July 24, 2004 I dont think it is very hard to show that the sum is convergent, since it is bounded by above (clearly a_n is less than the number of digits in 2^n, which seems to grow as O(n) ) and its partial sums are clearly increasing, hence convergent. Mandrake
haggy Posted July 24, 2004 Posted July 24, 2004 When I worked it out it converged to ~ 2/9. Merely calculated the sum of the first 2000 terms.
haggy Posted July 25, 2004 Posted July 25, 2004 Ja, I know that. Just thought it might give someone else a better idea seeing as MandrakRoot's estimate was 0.086617. Suppose I should have said "converge" instead of leaving out the apostophes. Here's the Mathematica code if anyone's interested. G[x_] := IntegerDigits[2^x] A[n_] := Length[select[G[n], #1 > 4 &]] N[sum[A[n]/(2^n), {n, 0, 2000}], 50] If anyone can see an error please tell me.
Dave Posted July 25, 2004 Posted July 25, 2004 The part I have the problem with is trying to find a specific formula for the digits of an, if indeed there is one. I've tried analysing the function but there doesn't seem to be a specific pattern. Any guidance would be appreciated
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now