dttom Posted November 29, 2009 Posted November 29, 2009 In this case there are more beta form (~64%) than alpha form (~36%), yet through anomeric effect the alpha form should be preferred with its anomeric hydroxyl group in axial conformation. So is this a counterargument or there are some other reasons?
Horza2002 Posted November 29, 2009 Posted November 29, 2009 Your right, when considering the electronic effect of the anomeric effect should have the hydroxyl group in the axial position. But you also have to consider the steric effects. If you look up chair conformations it should explain that groups are more stable in the equatorial poistion. With the hydroxyl group in the axila position, it essentially bangs into the group that are on the 3 and 5 carbons and so disfavours the axial position. The observed ratio of isomers results from the compraimse between these two effects
dttom Posted November 30, 2009 Author Posted November 30, 2009 I see, that means the ratio represents a coupling of the effects.
Horza2002 Posted November 30, 2009 Posted November 30, 2009 yer thats right. Its just the two affects competeing against each other and that ratio is the result
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now