Kerry Posted December 17, 2009 Posted December 17, 2009 http://www.labnews.co.uk/laboratory_article.php/5059/2/nano-scale-drug-delivery-for-chemotherapy-drugs Bioengineers used Escherichia coli which had been genetically altered to produce a specific artificial polypeptide known as a chimeric polypeptide. When attached to the chimeric polypeptide, the chemotherapy drug – in this case doxorubicin which is commonly used to treat cancers of the blood, breast ovaries and other organs – dissolves in water consistently and reliably in a size of 50 nanometers, which makes them ideal for cancer therapy. Once the drug has been delivered, the vehicle breaks down into harmless by-products, reducing toxicity to the recipient.
iNow Posted December 17, 2009 Posted December 17, 2009 (edited) Rubbish. Nano-scale pharmacology is nothing more than re-branded homeopathy. EDIT: Mea culpa. I was mistaken, and am glad this was nothing more than a false positive. My apologies to the OP. Edited December 17, 2009 by iNow
CharonY Posted December 17, 2009 Posted December 17, 2009 (edited) Huh? Nanoparticles or dispersion into nano-sized particles have been under investigation as vehicles of direct drug delivery for quite a while now. How does that connect to homeopathy? Edited December 17, 2009 by CharonY
iNow Posted December 17, 2009 Posted December 17, 2009 Hmmm... Okay... Perhaps not in this case, but as an FYI... Homeopathy proponents have taken to use of the term "nano-pharmacology." Perhaps I was a bit over vigilant and didn't read closely enough the OP.
CharonY Posted December 17, 2009 Posted December 17, 2009 Nope that is something entirely different. The OP was talking about nano-sized actual drugs. Also I am pretty sure that homeopaths would not use words like "polypeptide" or use nano as a measure of size.
Kerry Posted December 18, 2009 Author Posted December 18, 2009 Yes, basically the drugs are attached to nano-sized vehicles, in this case a polypeptide. Because it's so small (50nm) it can easily pass into the tumour and accumulate, which incidentally means you can shrink the tumour with fewer treatments. They've tested it on mice and it seems to work well: mice treated with doxorubicin alone had an average tumour size 25 times greater than those treated with the new formulation, and survived for 27 days, compared to 66 days for mice receiving the new treatment.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now