Martin Posted July 21, 2004 Share Posted July 21, 2004 Somebody at the Dublin conference made a transcript of the much-anticipated talk Stephen Hawking gave today on his proposal to resolve the black hole information paradox. They got the transcript to Sean Carroll a cosmologist/blogger at University of Chicago, who posted it here: http://pancake.uchicago.edu/%7Ecarroll/hawkingdublin.txt As you can see from the final paragraphs of the transcript, Hawking conceded his bet with John Preskill in style----the stakes being an encyclopedia, Hawking offered Preskill an Encyclopedia of Cricket. However Cricket is an obcure English pastime unknown to people in Preskill's part of the world---where they do more surfing and such. Preskill had, however, heard of baseball (which bears a superficial resemblance to Cricket) so Hawking in a grand gesture had the Encyclopedia of Baseball flown across the Atlantic so that he could present it as he conceded the bet. there are some interesting things to discuss about the paradox, and it helps to read what hawking actually said, instead relying on a journalistic interpretation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mossoi Posted July 22, 2004 Share Posted July 22, 2004 However Cricket is an obcure English Do me a favour. It's an international sport played by more countries than baseball with its own world cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Posted July 26, 2004 Author Share Posted July 26, 2004 John Baez was at the Dublin GR17 conference and gave one of the plenary talks, the day before Hawking's. Baez has a good physics website hosting the Usenet Physics FAQ and his own "this week's finds in mathematical physics" column Baez posted his report on the Dublin event today http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week207.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuhrerkeebs Posted August 15, 2004 Share Posted August 15, 2004 HAHAHAHAHA...I'm sorry...but all the data NASA collects on this kind of stuff gives indirect evidence of black holes. Check it out if you don't believe me. And black holes definitely don't go against the laws of relativity, in fact, Relativity predicts black holes...it's all implied in the most well known aspect of GR--so well known, in fact, that people with no real knowledge of GR besides the fact that gravity is caused by "curved space know about it--the Schwarzchild solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now