alton Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 Hello, Just went for movie last night. Well, i don't think its a good movie at all. Kinda bored, no doubt there are many cool action part but story wise is worse. Have you watch 2012 ??
AngryTurtle Posted January 6, 2010 Posted January 6, 2010 fake science*(disaster porn + bible reference) = decent use of 2 hours
Nikola Posted January 8, 2010 Posted January 8, 2010 Special effects were good and I liked Woody Harrelson's character, but other than that, it was like any other disaster movie.
Horza2002 Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 As a film it was ok; plenty of action scenes and the specila effects where good. But from a science point of view, I don't think I've seen a film that is so far from the truth in my life! Top marks to the main characters for out running a Yellowstone pyroclastic flow though...thats got to be a 100m dash world record
bascule Posted January 13, 2010 Posted January 13, 2010 No, I have not seen the movie, but I am a fan of the 2012 EOTW concept if only for the lulz
chitrangda Posted January 13, 2010 Posted January 13, 2010 I did see the movie, it was not as bad as you all saying. i kind off liked it.
nec209 Posted January 19, 2010 Posted January 19, 2010 As a film it was ok; plenty of action scenes and the specila effects where good. But from a science point of view, I don't think I've seen a film that is so far from the truth in my life! Top marks to the main characters for out running a Yellowstone pyroclastic flow though...thats got to be a 100m dash world record Yes but most people not scientist think that 2012 is it .Most 95 % of people on earth ( exceptions of higher number of agnostics and atheist in Europe and communist countries ) thing there is god and devil, good and evile .
insane_alien Posted January 23, 2010 Posted January 23, 2010 i recently watched it. bugger me that was terrible. worst movie i've ever watched. got pretty damn close to walking out of the cinema but then i remembered how crap the weather was and how cozy my seat was. anyway, why it was terrible. deus ex machina was used FAR too often. even for a film like this. everything goes right JUST in the nick of time for the protagonists. i accept that it has to be used to keep the audience on the edge of their seats and heck, i'll even enjoy it the first few times but repition makes it boring, there are other cinema tricks you could be doing, or even just regurgitating. at the end after the culmination of events one big wave and BAM everything is nice and calm again. bull f***ing s**t what happened with the yellowstone eruption, thats going to block out the sun for a while, i doubt the other supervolcanoes were quiet as well. and aftrica surviving the flood because it was raised by 3000ft? aye sure. that'll be why the crashed into everest at 28000ft eh? come on, give your audience SOME credit. and what about their crap choice of construction site for the ships? lets build it in a rocky valley where the wave will be concentrated. a nice flat space would have been better. and why build ships, they seemed to have a nice cosy mountain hideaway should have just built a deeper one. that movie wasn't worth the film it was printed on. explosions were kinda cool though. but movies need more than explosions.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now