Freeman Posted July 23, 2004 Posted July 23, 2004 I have a question, I forget what the symbol is for this set problem: {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10} ??? {4,6,8,9,10}= {1,2,3,5,7} What is it???
bloodhound Posted July 23, 2004 Posted July 23, 2004 that set operation is \ and is defined as [A \ B:={x:x in A and x not in B}
Dave Posted July 23, 2004 Posted July 23, 2004 or, typeset in lovely latexy goodness: [math]A \;\backslash\; B = \{ x\: | \: x \in A, x\notin B \}[/math]
Freeman Posted July 23, 2004 Author Posted July 23, 2004 How would I write this in mathematica code??? The equation: [math] A\:\backslash\; B = \{x\: l \:x \in A, x\notin B \} [/math] Where A is the set of all whole postive integers, and B is the set of [math] ^c\{D \times E\}_{D,E=2}[/math]
e(ho0n3 Posted July 23, 2004 Posted July 23, 2004 The other symbol you can use is "-", e.g. A - B. I don't know which one is more standard though. Personally, I like "-" better.
e(ho0n3 Posted July 23, 2004 Posted July 23, 2004 Maybe this link will help: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Set.html
Freeman Posted July 23, 2004 Author Posted July 23, 2004 That is good, but it doesn't give codes for anything!!!
Dave Posted July 24, 2004 Posted July 24, 2004 [math'] ^c\{D \times E\}_{D,E=2}[/math] This makes absolutely no mathematical sense.
bloodhound Posted July 24, 2004 Posted July 24, 2004 im completely baffled as well. can u explain what u meant by that Freeman
bloodhound Posted July 24, 2004 Posted July 24, 2004 unless , its his new twisted way of writing the set {4}
Dave Posted July 24, 2004 Posted July 24, 2004 But why would you have that complement thing? That's just silly.
bloodhound Posted July 24, 2004 Posted July 24, 2004 maybe he has discovered some interesting property about [math]\mathbb{C}[/math]\{4} that noone knows about
Freeman Posted July 24, 2004 Author Posted July 24, 2004 No, what I mean is the limit to the set {LxM} is c, L is at least 2 and so is M. The set of every solution of this is the set I was trying to write...
Dave Posted July 25, 2004 Posted July 25, 2004 Okay, firstly something you should know in regards to set theory notation: Firstly, most sets are defined using uppercase letters. Secondly, the operation A x B where A and B are sets is defined as the cartesian product of a set, notably: [math]A \times B = \{ (a,b) \: | \: a \in A, b \in B \}[/math] The proper mathematical way of defining your set is as follows: [math]S = \{ (l, m) \: | \: l, m \in \mathbb{R}, l, m \geq 2\}[/math] Unless, of course, I've made a mistake.
bloodhound Posted July 25, 2004 Posted July 25, 2004 I am still confused by the meaning of ordered pair (a,b)
Dave Posted July 25, 2004 Posted July 25, 2004 http://www.math.com/school/glossary/defs/ordered_pair.html
Freeman Posted July 25, 2004 Author Posted July 25, 2004 Thanks Dave! Where is the mathematica code manual? How would I put this into mathematica??? Thanks a lot Dave!
Dave Posted July 25, 2004 Posted July 25, 2004 Huh? How would putting this set into mathematica help with anything in the slightest?
Dave Posted July 25, 2004 Posted July 25, 2004 I think if we knew what the problem was, then we'd be able to help a bit.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now