Genecks Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 It it like this? 1. Eukaryote 2. Protist 3. Protozoa I cannot figure it out. I haven't ever really been able to figure it out. I've read the wiki article, but didn't grasp much. Maybe someone can drill this into my head?
Skye Posted January 12, 2010 Posted January 12, 2010 Yeah, that's right. The only snag is that protozoa and protista are gradually being phased out as classification terms. They don't fit the requirement to be monophyletic that's required by modern classification schemes. They are still used a lot to describe groups of organisms though.
Moontanman Posted January 13, 2010 Posted January 13, 2010 (edited) Opps, I misunderstood the question Edited January 13, 2010 by Moontanman content
dttom Posted January 13, 2010 Posted January 13, 2010 It should be: 1) Eubacteria 2) Arhaea 3) Eukaryotes Protists disperse into eukaryotes.
Genecks Posted January 13, 2010 Author Posted January 13, 2010 It should be:1) Eubacteria 2) Arhaea 3) Eukaryotes Protists disperse into eukaryotes. 1) Eubacteria 2) Arhaea 3) Eukaryotes 3.1) Protists 3.1.1) Protozoa Like so? I don't want to draw a tree...
CharonY Posted January 13, 2010 Posted January 13, 2010 Actually it is archaea and bacteria (eubacteria has been ditched as a term). The question is actually kind of invalid as the three domains of life classification according to Woese does not include protists (ditched as a taxon) or protozoa. Protists existed in the five kingdom system according to Whittaker consisting of animalia, planta, fungi, protista and monera. Again, it is not really used anymore.
dttom Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 1) Eubacteria2) Arhaea 3) Eukaryotes 3.1) Protists 3.1.1) Protozoa Like so? I don't want to draw a tree... I should say under the three-domain system, the term 'protist' is no longer a true phylogenetic clade, it intersperses into the group 'eukaryotes', some like choanoflagellates have closer relationship to human than even fungi, while some have more distant relationship.
Genecks Posted January 14, 2010 Author Posted January 14, 2010 Ok... so... Domain: Eukarya Kingdom: Protista But then again, some people don't want to put various protozoa in Protista, so they are considered excavata? Thus, they then have no kingdom? Why not use a kingdom? What's up with that? Leishmania donovani Scientific classification Domain: Eukaryota (unranked): Excavata Phylum: Euglenozoa Class: Kinetoplastida Order: Trypanosomatida Genus: Leishmania So, is the term "protozoa" out of date? And the term "protists" is out of date? So, do we still use the kingdom system under the domain system?
CharonY Posted January 14, 2010 Posted January 14, 2010 There are different systems and also depending on the context both are still used to loosely describe something. However in the cladistic system both are not used.
CharonY Posted January 15, 2010 Posted January 15, 2010 Nope. Archaea and bacteria are both prokaryotes.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now