ydoaPs Posted August 16, 2004 Posted August 16, 2004 so, you want no backup? say someone is infected with a disease, but shows no symptoms. the food gets sick and dies. what do you do now? surplus food would spoil. MREs last almost forever.
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted August 16, 2004 Author Posted August 16, 2004 Surplus food can be put in deep freeze, or dehydrated so it would last forever. MREs last only something like 4 years. And with someone getting sick with no symptoms, I really doubt that human diseases can be transmitted to plants.
ydoaPs Posted August 16, 2004 Posted August 16, 2004 what about the meat? anyway, bacteria might affect the plants. it depends on what it is. on a different subject, the entire crew would need g-suits. i would suggest hydrolic g-suits instead of pneumatic. i have seen video of a two pilots in g-suits at nine gs each having different types of suits. the one with the hydrolic suit was fine and the one in the pneumatic was about to pass out.
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted August 16, 2004 Author Posted August 16, 2004 G-suits? What the heck for? If they wanted to accelerate at 1g, you'd need a 4000 kilometer wide collection scoop for the engine, anyways! 1g is great. Like what we'd feel on earth. No g-suits.
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted August 16, 2004 Author Posted August 16, 2004 At 1g acceleration, you'd hit c in around a year. Not counting relativity. It simply would not be practical to have enough power to do high-g manuevers, since the collection area for hydrogen would have to be humongous. 1g takes a 4000 km wide area! And that's with a theoretical FUSION engine, anyways. (this from The Starflight Handbook). Turning is easy. You just can't turn very hard. But for exploration missions you don't need to anyways.
ydoaPs Posted August 16, 2004 Posted August 16, 2004 what about away missions? like going to an asteroid or something? edit:it would take much longer than one year to accelerate anywhare c at 1g. besides that, acceleration to c is impossible
ydoaPs Posted September 13, 2004 Posted September 13, 2004 possible hull material :http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?t=5854 ?
jsatan Posted September 13, 2004 Posted September 13, 2004 The best thing for this engine wise would be to use a cip engine with an electric generator for the motor of some sort, check it out. I wouldn’t worry about heat problems apart from cooking yourself in the ship, space is a hard place to keep cool. A cip engine is this, (it works as the weight move in and to of equilibrium). http://www.forceborne.com/ He’s made a boat that runs with this and its going to be in a move sometime this year, I’ve been talking to him regarding his designs, his videos on there are very old the new engines he has are much nice designed by boeing,
MolecularMan14 Posted September 17, 2004 Posted September 17, 2004 Cook Internal Propulsion http://www.americanantigravity.com/cook.html
Sayonara Posted September 17, 2004 Posted September 17, 2004 How is a CIP going to propel a spacecraft?
jsatan Posted September 17, 2004 Posted September 17, 2004 The pictures you find on the next are 4+ years old of the design, hes made a great engine. but still would be slow, lol.
john5746 Posted September 17, 2004 Posted September 17, 2004 I would suggest seat belts and less knobs. Sorry, just had to say that!
Sayonara Posted September 17, 2004 Posted September 17, 2004 Yeah it will be a bit slow, o well. I don't see that it would do anything, seeing as it seems to work by slinging weights around.
Pangloss Posted September 18, 2004 Posted September 18, 2004 Just as an amusing side-note to this discussion, according to this web page... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter ... anti-matter can presently be produced at a cost of roughly $25 billion per gram. Of course, in theory you only need a few grams of the stuff to reach the amount of energy expended on a typical late Apollo moon mission, so perhaps that's not so bad! (hehe)
RICHARDBATTY Posted September 18, 2004 Posted September 18, 2004 That cip thing looks a bit like something I was going to have a go at building but I didn't realy look to see if there was a design on there. I was thinking of a circular track with a weight on it. The weight goes round the track and the track rotates once per revolution of the weight. It would shake a lot and there is a lot of lost energy but some net thrust. It would provide more thrust than ion prop and could be driven by electric motors. Some of the lost energy can be recovered. The thing I would worry about is the constant bombardment by stelar matter. Have you seen/heard about astronauts seeing flashes of light whilst in space.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now