HOT FUSION (FissileDragon'sTailTicklers) vs COLD FUSION (Karen Silkwood Deja Vu?)

[K. B. Robertson]

Please enter in Google:

 

'Gene Mallove: Science Censorship is Invisible Evil'.

 

(Dear JaKari: All I know now and all I knew yesterday is that I (thought) I entered my statements and questions about cold fusion in:

 

"FORUM: Suggestions/Comments Forum."

 

Don't know if this one will get through either.

Not blaming anyone, but I really don't understand

basic things that computer seasoned internet people take

for granted. Doing the best I can.

 

I wish to initiate a discussion among contributors who know more than I of this crucially important subject, and/or those who may find and contribute other relevant informations from various locations on the net.

Contributions are respectfully requested and invitationally welcomed.

 

Sincerely,

Kent Benjamin Robertson

(Aka 'Equus', etceteras.)

 

*********************************

 

(*Close of the information about Gene Mallove and his work in cold fusion follows: main body of text was excluded from this post in order not to be prohibitively extensive;

whereas. the 'readability' of the material accessed via GOOGLE entry:

'Gene Mallove Science Censorship is Invisible Evil',

may be determined by anyone who cares to ponder what he <Mr. Mallove>

was working on, and, if it 'wasn't important' and/or

was 'untenable', 'intractable', etceteras:

why was he shot to death - allegedly over a 'property dispute' (apparently 'unrelated to his work')...

.....................................

 

*With the untimely passing of Gene Mallove, we have truly lost one of the real pioneers and one of the great alternative energy researchers of all time. We shall not see his likes again for many a year.

 

With deepest regret,

 

Tom Bearden

http://www.cheniere.org

 

Posted at April 30, 2004 12:31 PM

 

********************************************

 

Comments

 

I enjoyed your website. And if you and your viewers would like to read about scientific misconduct in planetary science please visit the scientific misconduct section of our website. http://www.bccmeteorites.com

 

Thanks

 

Posted by: Ray DeRusse on May 28, 2004 10:06 PM

--------------------------------------

 

My friend told me about your web site and I really enjoyed it. Very nicely done. Very interesting!

 

Posted by: David on June 9, 2004 03:33 AM

 

thank you, i just wanted to give a greeting and tell you i like your blog very much.

-----------------------------------------------

 

best online casinos tips

 

 

Posted by: best online casinos tips on July 25, 2004 11:15 PM

 

 

 

Post a comment

 

************************************

 

The following suggestions, statements, questions and speculations are authored and submitted by K. B. Robertson - hopefully inspiring others to equal or far surpass:

 

Subject: ISSUEDTHERMAL PARAMETERS & FUSION POWER:

A brief Solilioquy. In Search Of Answers:

 

An important issue (about the ominously approaching, imminently perjorative*'energy problem' and what might be most effectively and securely done about it).

 

My panelists are wondering if the so far insurmountable obstacles to the potential solution in the 'fusion' department, aren't deliberately being sat upon by the petroleum, nuclear fission, lumber and insurance industries.

 

Please let me know your thoughts on this and do forward it to whomever you know that may have more time for it and/or have the answer and/or explanation,

 

RSVP

- Naggie (K.B. - Crazy Horse - Robertson, aka, etceteras.)

 

******************************************

EXCERPT OF 28 June 04 MESSAGE FOLLOWS:

* Most readers of and contributors to posts like this have a basic if not intricate understanding of the destructive process of fission and it's accompanying hazards (the unstorable radioactive toxins accumulating at the 'back end of the cycle', in a 'normally' operating nuclear power plant, for example).

 

Likewise, most persons surfing through a forum such as this are more or less familiar with the potential solution to the problems of (destructive) fission generated power, in the potential solution of (constructive) fusion generated power:

A reaction in which atomic nuclei combine to form more massive nuculei; leaving some excess mass that is converted into energy.

 

Fusion being a constructive process, unlike the destructive 'back end of the cycle' - radioactive residuals - of nuclear fission/fissile-material fueled (sometimes colloquially misnomered 'hot fusion') nuclear power plants...

 

 

The drawback of 'hot fusion' being that it produces temperatures too high to be contained and controlled... There are other obstacles - with accompanying alternative solutions, but containing heat for fusion - instead of fission - is a key problem, whereas 'cold fusion' leans away from problems of extreme heat and 'unachievable containment'; while at the same time, 'cold fusion' is considered unachievable

 

There have been several highly publicized 'breakthroughs' that have resulted in misunderstandings and failures - ended in serious contretemps for several scientists (two in particular, as described in the information called up in the GOOGLE entry: 'Gene Mollave Science Censorship is Invisible Evil ').'

 

Yet, perhaps the 'uncontainable heat' is containable...

 

About five years ago it was international, mainstream featured news, that an insular paint called 'Starlite' had been successfully formulated and tested, and that one coat of it, for example, applied to any flammable material - say a common wooden grocery box, or a two by four - prevented a blowtorch, applied for hours, inches away from that wooden test object - with only one coat of Starlite paint between the forced-air torch and the wood, from even so much as scorching, let alone creating ignition temperature, upon the test object.

The same treatment was applied to a raw egg, resulting in not the slightest bit of cooking.

The public announcement, description demonstration and ensuing controversy emerged about five years ago; went on for about a year, whereas - to my knowledge - the entire issue, with its controversy, more or less faded (flamed) out (as it were)...

 

It has occurred to myself and probably many others that such an insular material may revolutionize - by constructively displacing - many major - enviromentally perilous - industries, beginning with the most wealthy and powerful - the ('world strangle-holding') petroleum 'cartel'; including all the contingencies of causing formerly flammable structures, habitats, warehouses, etc, to be minimally threatened by impending fire hazards, for example, putting a lot of, petroleum, nuclear power, insurance - and lumber and construction - companies and corporations out of (multi-billion dollar annual profiting), posterity-threatening business...

 

Perhaps most importantly, allowing - say, several feet or yards of thickness in the form of Starlite paint material, to serve as a containment vessel for Deuterium (H3O? 'Heavy Water'): quite possibly allowing the previously and reputedly unachievable containment of fusion reactors - with the unprecedented (formerly 'unachievable') advantage of displacing many presently dominant (air polluting and environment destroying) energy & power industries: fusion being a constructive process - producing no (unstorable) toxic radioactive substances, as do fission based nuclear power plants.

 

If any reader of this described problem with it's accompanying, proposed solution (including what became of - or the recipe for, Starlite paint - which seems to have mysteriously disappeared) knows more about it, please enter it in this forum discussion.

 

*********************************************

 

Evidently obscure is the (possibly 'covered up') question about Starlite paint as a possible; notably uncontroversied solution to the power/energy/fission vs fusion problem(s). Whatever individual or group effort may provide the singular or plural answers to the submitted question should certainly be duely accredited for partial or complete resolution, regarding this urgent, imminently pejorative, globally imperative issue.

 

Dear Reader may consider including a relevant directional sign to

http://einstein.periphery.cc/

(the MENU Home Page file, about Einstein's works) ?

Thank you,

- KBR