flyboy Posted June 16, 2005 Posted June 16, 2005 ok forget what i said all the EMP would do is just fry the circuits and the thing would be a flying rock happy now?
calbiterol Posted June 17, 2005 Posted June 17, 2005 No. We just got done establishing that nukes are made with circuitry that will almost completely, if not completely, resist an EMP device - so, nothing would happen. Don't worry, scanning the page comes back to haunt everyone once or twice.
AtomicMX Posted June 22, 2005 Posted June 22, 2005 hmmmm what about disabling the cruise system? o modifying it.
mmalluck Posted June 22, 2005 Posted June 22, 2005 dirty nukes arent Nor are all the electronic devices in the area where a dirty-nuke could be used. Would it be worth nocking out most of the electronic devices in a larger metropolitian area, to disable a dirty-nuke? What if the emp is just as likely to set off an improvised dirty-bomb/nuke? Doesn't seem like a good idea to me.
flyboy Posted June 22, 2005 Posted June 22, 2005 its either that or hav the city incinerated by the nuke now which one would u like to happen?
mmalluck Posted June 22, 2005 Posted June 22, 2005 If I was acting as the government and looking at these possible options: 1. Doing nothing 2. Setting off an EMP 3. Sending in special agents I'd go with 3. If we set off an EMP at the very best most electronics are destoryed and at the worse the EMP sets off the nuke itself. If either of those happen, you're going to have a ton of people complaining one way or another. With unhappy people come protest and possibly riots. Not pretty. With 3 you may stop the nuke and if so you're the hero. Nothing is broken and people love the government. If you fail you can deny ever knowing anything about it in the first place and blame the terrorist. You rally the people to your cause and go to war. By the time anyone figures out the goverment knew anything in the first place, the point is moot. Seems like the best option for the government, but not nessarily the people.
calbiterol Posted June 22, 2005 Posted June 22, 2005 I'd go for number 4: sending in special agents, carrying an emergency backup EMP. If they can't find it, or do and can't do anything about it, then absolute worst case - you know it's going to go off, so doing nothing is pointless - they use the EMP. Always have an escape route, a backup plan. Or so I've been told. That's what I'd go with, at least.
flyboy Posted June 23, 2005 Posted June 23, 2005 we will all eventually die of nuclear war anyway better get it over with sooner or later
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now